The shoe fits? Really! First of all...I'm an agnostic so you can throw out the whole "religious fanaticism" thing right from the get go! What have I ever done that would even REMOTELY label me as a "fascist"? I've got two college degrees...in History and Business Administration and I've spent most of my career running large nightclubs all around the US. I have zero problem with gay marriage. I have no problem with women having the choice to have a child or not.
I, too have a BA in History, with a minor in political science, am a certified paralegal, and have a law degree. I spent 35 years writing about workplace safety regs, media law, and labor law.
What I DO have a problem with...is people like you who lecture me on how I'm trying to force religion down your throat when all I'm doing is agreeing with our Founding Fathers who gave people the right to choose and observe the religion of their choice without government persecution! Why is it that an agnostic like myself has more religious tolerance than a "supposed" tolerant liberal like yourself?
Everybody wants the same: the right to choose their own religion without government "persecution." Don't you consider that laws past by openly ideological legislators designed to hamper the rights of women to make decisions regarding birth control and abortion and designed to hamper the rights of LGBT folks constitute interference with their choices of what, if any, religion to follow? Everyone has the right to come to their own theological/philosophical conclusions, but no one has the right to force them on others.
For example, in South Dakota people seeking abortions are subject to the following regulations
require by state law to
- give voluntary, written informed consent to doctors;
- Attend an initial consultation session with the performing doctor;
- Receive detailed information about the procedure, its potential risks, and alternatives to abortion;
- Attend a consultation at a state-registered pregnancy help center; and
- Wait seventy-two hours between the initial consultation and the procedure.
Source:
South Dakota Abortion Laws - FindLaw
The third requirement leaves open the questions of what the "detailed information" the client is to receive consists of, whether it is dictated by the government, and why it is necessary for state law to require this when this holds true by operation of any reliable medical practice for all medical procedures. Why is the requirement of having a consultation with an NGO before having an abortion necessary, but not any other procedure, particularly when the only "counseling" centers that are registered by the state government are run by ideologically-driven groups, and the "counseling" consists only of trying to indoctrinate these compulsory "clients"? Why the 72-hour waiting period?
Other examples: attempts by a (now-former) chief justice of a state supreme court to set up monuments to his chosen religion on public property and to reject the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that prohibiting people from marrying persons of the same sex, which obviously is driven by ideology, is unconstitutional, when he was supposed to function as a judicial officer. Same thing with the Kentucky clerk.
The people I mentioned were not limiting themselves and their beliefs to the individual circumstances of their own lives, they were/are attempting to make crucial decisions
for other people based on their own beliefs. So much for "tolerance."
The truth, Lysistrata...is that the far left has far less tolerance for other views than the right does at the moment! When the Tea Party took to the streets to protest against big government they didn't beat the opposition! Nor did they trash whatever city it was that they were protesting in! Since the left lost the last election they've taken to the streets wearing black masks and carrying clubs. So tell me who the REAL fascists are
The "truth" is, that it is only a small number of radicals who have "taken to the streets wearing black masks and carrying clubs." They are of the same hoodlum type as those who came to Charlottesville with shields, clubs, helmets, and guns, trying to cause trouble. The "truth" also is that the persons whom I described above as interfering with the rights of Americans such as women and gays are engaging in a pretty despicable form of fascism themselves and using religion as a cover for their aggressive behavior.