What's always missing in the "gun debate"

[nat4900]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

 

[Oddball]

Right on cue, the nebulous term "common sense" gets invoked....As though you moonbats have any of it at all, let alone a corner on the market.

 

[BluesLegend]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

 

[CowboyTed]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

 

[Jitss617]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

A plane ticket for you to move out.. we are a Republic you’ll never take our guns

 

[BluesLegend]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

No.

 

[Thinker101]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

Sure, just take a look at just about anything liberal Dems have been involved with...dumbass.

 

[BluesLegend]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

Sure, just take a look at just about anything liberal Dems have been involved with...dumbass.

There's not a bigger group of control freaks on the planet. Worse the prissy stuck up bitches think they know best and they should rule the masses.

 

[Oddball]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

Our old pal Azog didn't get that memo.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

The problem with the ‘gun debate’ is that it lacks resolution.

And it’s the responsibility of the Supreme Court to provide that resolution – a responsibility the Court has failed to fulfill.

In Miller the Court made a distinction between weapons ‘in common use’ and weapons which were ‘dangerous and unusual’ – the former whose possession were entitled to Constitutional protections, and the latter outside of the scope of Second Amendment protections.

‘Should gun control again reach the Supreme Court, the legal question may very well be whether assault weapons like the AR-15, which are now some of the most popular in the United States, are guns in common use under Miller or dangerous and unusual weapons under Heller.”

United States v. Miller: Which Side of the Gun Debate Does It Support?

It’s understood that the Supreme Court doesn’t consider the issue ripe for review, particularly given the lower courts consistently upholding AWBs as being Constitutional.

But the political urgency of the ‘gun debate’ demands that the justices set aside accepted judicial criteria and hear one of the many challenges to assault weapon bans so that lawmakers and citizens can know whether an AR 15 is a weapon in common use or dangerous and unusual and subject to lawful prohibition.

Absent such a decision by the High Court, the pointless idiocy that is the ‘gun debate’ will continue.

 

[CowboyTed]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

A plane ticket for you to move out.. we are a Republic you’ll never take our guns

What has a Republic got to do with it... Germany, Ireland & France are all Republics without insane gun laws...

Could you show us what being a Republic has to do with gun laws..

 

[Weatherman2020]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

If it’s such common sense Democrats had a super majority and failed to pass it.

Why aren’t you Leftards talking about all the felons you release early from prison who go and shoot people soon after release?

 

[Thinker101]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

The problem with the ‘gun debate’ is that it lacks resolution.

And it’s the responsibility of the Supreme Court to provide that resolution – a responsibility the Court has failed to fulfill.

In Miller the Court made a distinction between weapons ‘in common use’ and weapons which were ‘dangerous and unusual’ – the former whose possession were entitled to Constitutional protections, and the latter outside of the scope of Second Amendment protections.

‘Should gun control again reach the Supreme Court, the legal question may very well be whether assault weapons like the AR-15, which are now some of the most popular in the United States, are guns in common use under Miller or dangerous and unusual weapons under Heller.”

United States v. Miller: Which Side of the Gun Debate Does It Support?

It’s understood that the Supreme Court doesn’t consider the issue ripe for review, particularly given the lower courts consistently upholding AWBs as being Constitutional.

But the political urgency of the ‘gun debate’ demands that the justices set aside accepted judicial criteria and hear one of the many challenges to assault weapon bans so that lawmakers and citizens can know whether an AR 15 is a weapon in common use or dangerous and unusual and subject to lawful prohibition.

Absent such a decision by the High Court, the pointless idiocy that is the ‘gun debate’ will continue.

Yep, most stupid-ass ideas lack resolution.

 

[hjmick]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

You want common sense, yet you refer to those who advocate for the 2nd Amendment as "gun nuts."

Why don't you come back when you're serious...

 

[BluesLegend]

The problem with the ‘gun debate’ is that it lacks resolution.

LOL the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution there's your resolution. If you disagree with the 2nd amendment and feel it needs to be abolished or changed then follow the process to amend the Constitution. Go right ahead and try mustering the votes and support of the American people. You won't because you know you can't, so you scheme and engage in unconstitutional restrictions. There I utterly destroyed you.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

Sure, just take a look at just about anything liberal Dems have been involved with...dumbass.

And as this post illustrates, that pointless idiocy comes from the right.

 

[Oddball]

And as this post illustrates, that pointless idiocy comes from the right.

You're as leftist as it gets, and your pointless idiocy infests the forum on a daily basis.

 

[CowboyTed]

What's always missing in the gun debate is common sense.

On one extreme side of the issue, you have gun-nuts who keep on "thinking" that virtually ANY gun legislation to curb the mass shootings is tantamount to giving up their weapons to fight off the U.S. government armed forces......Yep, insanity personified.

On the other extreme side of the issue, you now have someone like Beto demanding that citizens turn in their assault rifles (AR-15 and other war military style war rifles) or face the stigma of becoming an outlaw.

What is missing in the above debate is an understanding of even recent history.

In the mid 1930's, we DID ban the sale of machine guns and short-barreled rifles, etc. mostly based on the rationale that such weapons were NOT for the hunter and sportsman....The use of such weaponry was regarded as nefarious....and the law makers were then correct.

Ask yourself WHY we don't readily sell RPG rifles?......After all, if the mental rationale of most gun owners is to be allowed to buy military weapons to ward off the federal government assault on their liberty, an RPG rifle or machine gun would certainly be handy, don't you think???

If it’s such common sense Democrats had a super majority and failed to pass it.

Why aren’t you Leftards talking about all the felons you release early from prison who go and shoot people soon after release?

Debunking the Myth: Obama's Two-Year Supermajority | HuffPost

 

[BluesLegend]

Its been proven that if we give gun control advocates an inch they take a mile. So piss off gun control advocates you lying scum.

So it has been proven...

Can we see your proof?

Sure, just take a look at just about anything liberal Dems have been involved with...dumbass.

And as this post illustrates, that pointless idiocy comes from the right.

You people have nothing to bitch and complain about. Amend the US Constitution, hell abolish the 2nd amendment if that's your goal. Why don't you gutless bunch of punks DO IT?

 

[BluesLegend]

Multiple mass shootings and the Dem party hasn't even attempted to amend the constitution to change/abolish the 2nd amendment, why? They have spent millions on anti gun propaganda, why not amend the constitution? This is typical liberal BS they can't muster the votes so they attempt to rig.