BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Hey. He gave you a choice.Fuck off.
Lol.
The proper response is coincidentally the one you gave him.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey. He gave you a choice.Fuck off.
The lawyer specifically said the theory he was arguing would require impeachment and then a finding of guilty from the senate. If you believe differently, explain what you think he was saying, and why you think that.Wrong. The lawyer answered a question about the proposition that the President would have to be impeached and convicted first. Although a very literal reading of the impeachment clause does seem to imply this, I doubt the court will agree. And I don’t know that the lawyer’s answer was correct.
That’s quite different than the immunity part of their argument.
Only a moron would read it that way. Hi moron.Oh, dear. Has Bulldog humiliated you again?
The kind that wears girdles, spray paints his face, and spends 1.5 hours a day on his rat's nest hairdo - at 78 years old.Indeed. What kind of child throws things when they are angered. Pathetic.
I haven't read any of the thread. That why I asked. I was just going by history.Only a moron would read it that way. Hi moron.
I believe I just said that. I believe that a literal reading of the impeachment provision does suggest as much. I also said I thought the lawyer answered incorrectly. And I also said that I doubted the SCOTUS would agree with that argument.The lawyer specifically said the theory he was arguing would require impeachment and then a finding of guilty from the senate. If you believe differently, explain what you think he was saying, and why you think that.
It's not over yet. He still needs to call me a few names, claim he made his point, and then run like the little bitch he is.Oh, dear. Has Bulldog humiliated you again?
No. You’re a moron.I haven't read any of the thread. That why I asked. I was just going by history.
No. You’re a moron.
Yes. He’s a flaming moron.![]()
Why would he grab Democrats? Some of those "women" may not have P#ssies to grab...He'd be too busy, shutting down businesses while opening up the same type business in their place, and of course, grabbing P#ssies from random women, as they like that sort of thing from the rich and powerful, especially presidents, as no laws would apply to presidents, so the sky is the limit!![]()
I don’t know if Syndi identifies as a male or female. It hardly matters. It’s a degenerate moron in either case.Word is it's a she...or maybe a he/she
I've got a great ass.Word is it's a she...or maybe a he/she
3...2...1...I've got a great ass.
Look, it was a trump lawyer, what can I say? I have told you how stupid Republican Trump lawyers, invariably are. Habba almost got thrown in jail, last week. So, the guy's answer to the judge was, shall we say in artful. I sure the judges are fair minded and give crib points, understand the legal people he hires and nobody will remember, and it will blow over before the election, as who listens to all those mainstream news outlets anyway?Don't GAF about the media hack opinion, of the absurd hypothetical that a hack judge tossed out here, just to get exactly this reaction from gullible boobs like you.
I'd like to say that you're smarter than this, but you're obviously not.
I've got a great ass.
You need to look below your shoulders...I've got a great ass.