Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
I wanna ask this question and try to keep partisan politics out of it.
What would Hitler have done about ISIS? Lets use alternative history. Lets say Hitler stopped his push with the French appeasement. ..and WW2 stopped. And Hitler stayed in power over his new empire....and ISIS struck them. Lets say it was 1950.
What would Hitler have done?
My point is...maybe we are just not evil enough to deal with Islamic radicalism. Obama. Bush. Reagan. ALL of us...we are all civilized Americans.
That old saying that sometimes a monster can only be destroyed by another monster...is it true? Afterall...Hitler was ultimately defeated because he picked a fight with another monster- Russia and Stalin.
Does our modern world have a monster that is the equal of ISIS? In a twisted way...I think this theory is why the Middle East needed some evil dictators. Radical Islam will flourish until another monster defeats it.
The West was and is just too nice to do what may be required.
What would Hitler have done about ISIS? Blamed the Jews.

There's always been evil in the world, and there always will be. But you don't fight evil with more evil. Good has always triumphed and it always will because the overwhelming majority of people are good, not evil. At some point then people will rise up and handle problems.
But you don't propose fixing these little flare ups by invading, nuking, or some other childish answer. It's a strictly local problem. When the locals have had enough they'll fix it. But it's not a problem the west can ever fix because in trying to fix this sort of thing all we do is ensure a next generation of evil people who'll come for us.
"You have a problem in ISIS and other terror groups middle east. You're on your own this time. Wanna live, fix it yourselves. If we in the West try we'll only encouarge more of the same. Muslims need to fix Muslim problems."