P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,825
- 4,933
- 1,815
The Palestinians in BDS have no political affiliation. Basically they do not like any of the political parties.
What Will Improve the Palestinian Economy?
- Thread starter Shusha
- Start date
That's ridiculous. The BDS Cult was invented by an Arab-Moslem and islamism is clearly a politico-religious organization. You might actually want to acquaint yourself with the goals of BDS. There is clearly a political component aside from the expected component of rabid anti-semitism.
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,825
- 4,933
- 1,815
Could you elaborate?
What are you befuddled about?
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,825
- 4,933
- 1,815
Nothing. I just don't know what is rattling about in your head.
Other than what I already elaborated for you, you're still befuddled.
aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,689
- 280
Take the message to the streets not the political authority or filter of the extreme press. Take it to social media, radio, town markets, anyplace that palestinians and Israel mix be it work, crossing, near hospitals, around Jerusalem, schools, even to arab israelis that mix with palestinians on a regular basis.
Out to Jordan, Egypt, Saudi. Printed messages/fliers through aid groups.
PA and Israel are building a pipeline together so the message can get back through them.
When they speak to the "PA", the people only hear what the PA wants them to hear, same with gaza. Elsewhere in the world, palestinians and jews actually pray together. They socialize, they argue and are friends. Without the political filter they could be in the middle east as well.
aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,689
- 280
Not the tyrannical PA[Fatah] to begin with, it would be far more interesting to see what they actually want.
RoccoR
Gold Member
P F Tinmore, Daniyel, et al,
The issue of Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman is really more of an internal and domestic matter. But American should not be apprehensive; recognizing that an advocate of a strong central government on matters of economics, trade and commerce is NOT the same thing as a "fascist;" as opponents paint him. Heaven knows that here in the US, the Patriot Act and the Federal Reserve Act are just two examples of very strong centralized powers.
While fascism does support dictatorial powers, Minister Lieberman seems to be concentrating more on a strong defense authority, which is less politicized. That is much different from implementation of strong dictatorial control across the entire spectrum of government. The mutual beneficial points deal with the nationalism that cultivates an environment that is focused on the defense of the nation's sovereignty, the protection of the citizenry from foreign military coercion, and the preservation of the culture and history; free from the consequences of Palestinian Jihad, Radicalized Islamic Movements, Muslim Extremism, and the external interference by global political orders that do not operate in Israel's best interest.
Yes, well the definition of a "Palestinian" rests with the strict interpretation of the "citizenship." But there are inherent problems in going directly to the people; first among these problems is the impact of fanatically Muslims and there attempt to save us all, even if we do not adhere to their [Golden Age of Islam (7th to 13th centuries)] Shira Law; which itself is torn between two strands and locked in a deadly confrontation between Sunni and Shi'ite. Both sects believe that they each subscribe to the proper interpretation (understood as the unalterable divine law).
The very odd thing is that Islam is more authoritarian than anything the Defense Minister suggests. Now this is were it get interesting! According to one of the more influential groups of Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP), "Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem (an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law, typically donating to the Muslim religious or charitable purposes with no intention of reclaiming the assets)." And these influential HoAP also profess that: "This Waqf remains as long as earth and heaven remain. Any procedure in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, where Palestine is concerned, is null and void."
In this sense, before you can answer the question of whether or not Citizenship must be decided Sharia Law. And in that context, does Sharia Law even allow the considerations of the Basic Law or even International Law.
Who is a Palestinian --- it is unknown. What is known is that the Human Rights Council is completely taken over by Islamist and the Council may not mention Islam and may even say the word "Sharia." (Testimony in the video...)
Most Respectfully,
R
The issue of Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman is really more of an internal and domestic matter. But American should not be apprehensive; recognizing that an advocate of a strong central government on matters of economics, trade and commerce is NOT the same thing as a "fascist;" as opponents paint him. Heaven knows that here in the US, the Patriot Act and the Federal Reserve Act are just two examples of very strong centralized powers.
While fascism does support dictatorial powers, Minister Lieberman seems to be concentrating more on a strong defense authority, which is less politicized. That is much different from implementation of strong dictatorial control across the entire spectrum of government. The mutual beneficial points deal with the nationalism that cultivates an environment that is focused on the defense of the nation's sovereignty, the protection of the citizenry from foreign military coercion, and the preservation of the culture and history; free from the consequences of Palestinian Jihad, Radicalized Islamic Movements, Muslim Extremism, and the external interference by global political orders that do not operate in Israel's best interest.
(COMMENT)
Yes, well the definition of a "Palestinian" rests with the strict interpretation of the "citizenship." But there are inherent problems in going directly to the people; first among these problems is the impact of fanatically Muslims and there attempt to save us all, even if we do not adhere to their [Golden Age of Islam (7th to 13th centuries)] Shira Law; which itself is torn between two strands and locked in a deadly confrontation between Sunni and Shi'ite. Both sects believe that they each subscribe to the proper interpretation (understood as the unalterable divine law).
The very odd thing is that Islam is more authoritarian than anything the Defense Minister suggests. Now this is were it get interesting! According to one of the more influential groups of Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP), "Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem (an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law, typically donating to the Muslim religious or charitable purposes with no intention of reclaiming the assets)." And these influential HoAP also profess that: "This Waqf remains as long as earth and heaven remain. Any procedure in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, where Palestine is concerned, is null and void."
In this sense, before you can answer the question of whether or not Citizenship must be decided Sharia Law. And in that context, does Sharia Law even allow the considerations of the Basic Law or even International Law.
Who is a Palestinian --- it is unknown. What is known is that the Human Rights Council is completely taken over by Islamist and the Council may not mention Islam and may even say the word "Sharia." (Testimony in the video...)
Most Respectfully,
R
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,825
- 4,933
- 1,815
Can you link to a Sharia law book? Sharia law seems to be determined by the local leaders and almost always (Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan are on the extreme end.) applied to family issues like marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance.
Palestine has Sharia courts but their use is strictly voluntary. Nobody can be hauled into Sharia courts. Their jurisdiction is strictly family issues not criminal issues. BTW, I think there are three women who sit as judges in Palestine's Sharia courts. 2 Palestinian women now Islamic court judges
In moderate societies, these laws are mutable depending on the good of the local populations, like Palestine. One example has to do with inheritance in Gaza. In the past if a man died the estate would bypass the wife and go directly to the oldest son. Hamas changed that and put the wife first in line. We will now see women owning homes, businesses, farms, etc. unlike in the past.
Like this do you mean ?
Internet History Sourcebooks Project
BBC - Religions - Islam: Sharia
And not forgetting the koran and hadiths
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
I am a "Trumpster" and I plead GUILTY... I wanted a "bull in a China shop."- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 17
-
-
Does Erika Kirk support pedophiles? This woman thinks so- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 29
