What the Right Wing Disinformation Machine Got Wrong About Brown U Shooting: Everything

That is not true.

He was walking around armed in a place he had no business being in. Only idiots and troublemakers are that dumb.
In a riot that destroyed thousands of businesses? Causing billions in damages? He was protecting his friends business, a couple thousands of your dumbasses should've got the same.
 
Yes, he did. He didn't live there, he didn't even own a gun. He acquired a gun and went there looking for someone to shoot.
Was he convicted? No, so move along. I see you haven't said anything about this.
FB_IMG_1764526169357.webp
 
View attachment 1196292
There is a quote, you support an incestuous pedophile.
Okay, that's not the quote you presented. Where's the quote you put up.

As for that diary, it's kind of useless as evidence, because it's been through too many hands.

Here's a hint, if you have to ask, "Was I molested?" you probably weren't. If you were molested, you'd know it.
 


Here's a hint, if you have to ask, "Was I molested?" you probably weren't. If you were molested, you'd know it.
Repugnant response. A young girl would certainly struggle with whether her father's molestation was normal or had she done something wrong. To do this to your daughter there is a huge amount of psychological grooming by the father.
 
Repugnant response. A young girl would certainly struggle with whether her father's molestation was normal or had she done something wrong. To do this to your daughter there is a huge amount of psychological grooming by the father.

Except there's no evidence he did anything.

Look, if Ashley published a tell-all book about her dad, I'd have to rethink that.

But what your 'evidence" consists of is a supposed diary written in drug rehab that was stolen by a couple of low-lifes who tried to sell it. How do you make it more sellable? Add some salacious stuff!

Even Project Veritas wanted nothing to do with this. That should tell you a lot.
 
Except there's no evidence he did anything.

Look, if Ashley published a tell-all book about her dad, I'd have to rethink that.

But what your 'evidence" consists of is a supposed diary written in drug rehab that was stolen by a couple of low-lifes who tried to sell it. How do you make it more sellable? Add some salacious stuff!

Even Project Veritas wanted nothing to do with this. That should tell you a lot.
Wonder why she was in a drug rehab..........where those in recovery work through the trauma and record/journal it it her diary.

Why are Biden progeny so susceptible to addiction....what happened in that family?
 
Okay, that's not the quote you presented. Where's the quote you put up.

As for that diary, it's kind of useless as evidence, because it's been through too many hands.

Here's a hint, if you have to ask, "Was I molested?" you probably weren't. If you were molested, you'd know it.
People went to jail over it. Quit defending an incestuous pedophile. Next your going to be defending Clinton over his sex with children. Because of what the Epstein files are showing.
 
People went to jail over bullshit. Going to be amusing watching you defend Clinton over the Epstein files.
I don't care what happens to clinton. If he's a pedo he belongs under the jail with tRump and the others.
 
Wonder why she was in a drug rehab..........where those in recovery work through the trauma and record/journal it it her diary.

Why are Biden progeny so susceptible to addiction....what happened in that family?

It could just be- wait for it - some people are more genetically inclined towards substance abuse.

I think losing their mother in a horrible car accident might have had something to do with it.
 
Yes, he did. He didn't live there, he didn't even own a gun. He acquired a gun and went there looking for someone to shoot.

So Rittenhouse is a murderer despite a jury saying otherwise, but Trump is guilty of something because a jury said he is.

Funny stuff.
 
15th post
People went to jail over it. Quit defending an incestuous pedophile. Next your going to be defending Clinton over his sex with children. Because of what the Epstein files are showing.

People went to jail because they committed theft and fraud.

Again, no evidence that would hold up in a court of law.

On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence of Trump doing some nasty shit with Epstein.
 
So Rittenhouse is a murderer despite a jury saying otherwise, but Trump is guilty of something because a jury said he is.

Funny stuff.
Yes, your pocket sized murderer is guilty, not because the jury said so or not but because we all have seen the evidence.

And yes, tRump is guilty. Again not because of what the jury said but because we have all seen the evidence.
 
So Rittenhouse is a murderer despite a jury saying otherwise, but Trump is guilty of something because a jury said he is.

Funny stuff.

The Jury didn't get to hear all the evidence, thanks to Judge Senile.

They didn't get to hear the tape of him wishing he had his gun so he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS.

They didn't get to see the pictures of him with the Nazi Proud Boys.

They didn't get to see the video of him beating up a 14 year old girl.

Now, the fact of the incident isn't in dispute. He killed two men and wounded a third.

The issue was his INTENT. Was he a guy forced to defend himself, or was he a bad apple who was looking to murder people.
 
Back
Top Bottom