What the **** is wrong with the Left?

[NYcarbineer]

Government, as a means.

Think about that, if you learn how to think.

Government is the means by which we establish a set of laws, and the means by which we enforce them.

'enforce'...by force...get it??

According to you most law enforcement gets it wrong. Do you really believe that most people who, for example, get a traffic ticket, were innocent? 'More than likely' to be innocent?

Government is not how we establish laws.

Traffic laws are not acts of government?

Prove that.

 

[LilOlLady]

What is really wrong with the Left is the Right?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Once again, you have failed to read what you're pretending you know something about, and,

you're attempting to establish as fact that which has not been established as fact.

If I am wrong you should have no problem proving it.

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the accuser. I suppose that's another aspect of government you believe is wrong,

that forcing the prosecution to prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

 

[KnobbyWalsh]

I came here intending to rant about an idiot that thinks it is perfectly justifiable to treat one person differently than another just because she disagrees with them on political philosophy, and I stumbled across something that is so stupid it defies common decency.

A college student now faces expulsion because school administrators say that she is 'intimidating' her alleged rapist by publicly discussing the sexual assault.
The victim, a female sophomore at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, went through the school-sanctioned order of filing a complaint against her fellow student and ex-boyfriend raped her.
Rather than remain anonymous about her sexual assault, she has publicly released her name- Landen Gambill- spoken in many news interviews, and even talked about her own experiences in front of a variety of media representatives at a public rally pushing for the school to increase their support for victims.

Landen Gambill may be expelled from school because she 'INTIMIDATED her rapist' by speaking out about the assault | Mail Online

I dare any asshole to ever tell me again about the right wing war on woman.

**** every ******* one of you.

What the **** is wrong with the left? Probably the same motherfucking fucked up thing that is wrong with the fucked up right, right?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Government is the means by which we establish a set of laws, and the means by which we enforce them.

'enforce'...by force...get it??

According to you most law enforcement gets it wrong. Do you really believe that most people who, for example, get a traffic ticket, were innocent? 'More than likely' to be innocent?

Government is not how we establish laws.

Traffic laws are not acts of government?

Prove that.

Did I say that? I said, and I quote, "Government is not how we establish laws."

I suggest you parse that sentence, find out what all the words actually mean, and then come back and admit that I got something right.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Government is not how we establish laws.

Traffic laws are not acts of government?

Prove that.

Did I say that? I said, and I quote, "Government is not how we establish laws."

I suggest you parse that sentence, find out what all the words actually mean, and then come back and admit that I got something right.

Since we both know we have laws, and since we both know that our system of laws had to be established by something,

tell us what establishes those laws if government doesn't.

Traffic laws were not established by government? Then where did they come from, how did they come into being, how are they administered and enforced? if not by government.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I came here intending to rant about an idiot that thinks it is perfectly justifiable to treat one person differently than another just because she disagrees with them on political philosophy, and I stumbled across something that is so stupid it defies common decency.

A college student now faces expulsion because school administrators say that she is 'intimidating' her alleged rapist by publicly discussing the sexual assault.
The victim, a female sophomore at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, went through the school-sanctioned order of filing a complaint against her fellow student and ex-boyfriend raped her.
Rather than remain anonymous about her sexual assault, she has publicly released her name- Landen Gambill- spoken in many news interviews, and even talked about her own experiences in front of a variety of media representatives at a public rally pushing for the school to increase their support for victims.

Landen Gambill may be expelled from school because she 'INTIMIDATED her rapist' by speaking out about the assault | Mail Online

I dare any asshole to ever tell me again about the right wing war on woman.

**** every ******* one of you.

Yeah.....you're.....

....FULL-O'-SHIT....

.....alright.

Stupid Fuckin' Teabaggers​

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Traffic laws are not acts of government?

Prove that.

Did I say that? I said, and I quote, "Government is not how we establish laws."

I suggest you parse that sentence, find out what all the words actually mean, and then come back and admit that I got something right.

Since we both know we have laws, and since we both know that our system of laws had to be established by something,

tell us what establishes those laws if government doesn't.

Traffic laws were not established by government? Then where did they come from, how did they come into being, how are they administered and enforced? if not by government.

I see basic English eludes you even after I describe the process.

 

[Pogo]

If I am wrong you should have no problem proving it.

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the accuser. I suppose that's another aspect of government you believe is wrong,

that forcing the prosecution to prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

Thank God for that, but in this thread you are the accuser, in a case you have yet to even articulate, let alone substantiate.

I'm dumbfounded that you're even keeping such a specious embarrassment alive. It would be like somebody posting "what the **** is wrong with the right??? Some guy just cut me off in traffic!!! **** every ******* one of you!!"

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did I say that? I said, and I quote, "Government is not how we establish laws."

I suggest you parse that sentence, find out what all the words actually mean, and then come back and admit that I got something right.

Since we both know we have laws, and since we both know that our system of laws had to be established by something,

tell us what establishes those laws if government doesn't.

Traffic laws were not established by government? Then where did they come from, how did they come into being, how are they administered and enforced? if not by government.

I see basic English eludes you even after I describe the process.

You didn't describe anything. Government makes the laws. Government enforces the laws.

You don't want any government, therefore, to get back to the topic of the thread, in your world, a raped woman would have no government to go to for justice.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If I am wrong you should have no problem proving it.

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the accuser. I suppose that's another aspect of government you believe is wrong,

that forcing the prosecution to prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

You are wrong to say that this woman is telling the truth in her claim of being raped. You have no idea whether or not she is telling the truth.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the accuser. I suppose that's another aspect of government you believe is wrong,

that forcing the prosecution to prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

Thank God for that, but in this thread you are the accuser, in a case you have yet to even articulate, let alone substantiate.

I'm dumbfounded that you're even keeping such a specious embarrassment alive. It would be like somebody posting "what the **** is wrong with the right??? Some guy just cut me off in traffic!!! **** every ******* one of you!!"

Let me clarify my position for you, If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Since we both know we have laws, and since we both know that our system of laws had to be established by something,

tell us what establishes those laws if government doesn't.

Traffic laws were not established by government? Then where did they come from, how did they come into being, how are they administered and enforced? if not by government.

I see basic English eludes you even after I describe the process.

You didn't describe anything. Government makes the laws. Government enforces the laws.

You don't want any government, therefore, to get back to the topic of the thread, in your world, a raped woman would have no government to go to for justice.

Let me see if this makes sense to you, government is not how we establish the law, the law is how we establish government.

In other words, you have the process backwards, and I pointed it out to you. Instead of actually thinking you chose to repeat yourself ad nauseum, and remained wrong.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the accuser. I suppose that's another aspect of government you believe is wrong,

that forcing the prosecution to prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

You are wrong to say that this woman is telling the truth in her claim of being raped. You have no idea whether or not she is telling the truth.

I don't recall saying that, want to point out when I did so?

 

[Pogo]

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

Thank God for that, but in this thread you are the accuser, in a case you have yet to even articulate, let alone substantiate.

I'm dumbfounded that you're even keeping such a specious embarrassment alive. It would be like somebody posting "what the **** is wrong with the right??? Some guy just cut me off in traffic!!! **** every ******* one of you!!"

Let me clarify my position for you, If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove.

Let me clarify your position for you:
Topic title: What the **** is wrong with the Left?
OP evidence of "Left": Nonexistent
OP evidence of "Right": Nonexistent
OP evidence of "Center" Nonexistent
OP evidence of any political content at all: Nonexistent

For further study, see "burden of proof". See also "proving the negative".

What the **** is wrong with the Center? I just bought an ice cream cone and there's no jimmies on it!! **** every ******* one of you!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

You are wrong to say that this woman is telling the truth in her claim of being raped. You have no idea whether or not she is telling the truth.

I don't recall saying that, want to point out when I did so?

"the honor code says "All students must refrain from lying, cheating, and stealing as well as from engaging in conduct that significantly impairs the welfare or educational opportunities of others in the university community. This includes refraining from all forms of academic dishonesty, including plagiarism. Your full participation and observance of the Honor Code is expected at all times."

Nothing in there about not talking about something that happened if it is true."

You don't know it's true.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Newsflash, I am not the government.

Like I said, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove.

Thank God for that, but in this thread you are the accuser, in a case you have yet to even articulate, let alone substantiate.

I'm dumbfounded that you're even keeping such a specious embarrassment alive. It would be like somebody posting "what the **** is wrong with the right??? Some guy just cut me off in traffic!!! **** every ******* one of you!!"

Let me clarify my position for you, If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove.

A claim unproven need not be disproven.

You made a claim for which you provided no proof. Your claim can be dismissed as baseless.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I see basic English eludes you even after I describe the process.

You didn't describe anything. Government makes the laws. Government enforces the laws.

You don't want any government, therefore, to get back to the topic of the thread, in your world, a raped woman would have no government to go to for justice.

Let me see if this makes sense to you, government is not how we establish the law, the law is how we establish government.

In other words, you have the process backwards, and I pointed it out to you. Instead of actually thinking you chose to repeat yourself ad nauseum, and remained wrong.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice was established by Congress. Congress is government. The UCMJ is a set of laws.

Government established that code, and thus established that set of laws.

You may be enjoying some sort of bizarre chicken or egg game here, but you are only doing so to divert from the fact that your original point was busted.

 

[Dante]

I came here intending to rant about an idiot that thinks it is perfectly justifiable to treat one person differently than another just because she disagrees with them on political philosophy, and I stumbled across something that is so stupid it defies common decency.

A college student now faces expulsion because school administrators say that she is 'intimidating' her alleged rapist by publicly discussing the sexual assault.
The victim, a female sophomore at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, went through the school-sanctioned order of filing a complaint against her fellow student and ex-boyfriend raped her.
Rather than remain anonymous about her sexual assault, she has publicly released her name- Landen Gambill- spoken in many news interviews, and even talked about her own experiences in front of a variety of media representatives at a public rally pushing for the school to increase their support for victims.

Landen Gambill may be expelled from school because she 'INTIMIDATED her rapist' by speaking out about the assault | Mail Online

I dare any asshole to ever tell me again about the right wing war on woman.

**** every ******* one of you.

what the **** are you rambling on about? A college student?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Thank God for that, but in this thread you are the accuser, in a case you have yet to even articulate, let alone substantiate.

I'm dumbfounded that you're even keeping such a specious embarrassment alive. It would be like somebody posting "what the **** is wrong with the right??? Some guy just cut me off in traffic!!! **** every ******* one of you!!"

Let me clarify my position for you, If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove. If I am wrong, it should be easy to prove.

Let me clarify your position for you:
Topic title: What the **** is wrong with the Left?
OP evidence of "Left": Nonexistent
OP evidence of "Right": Nonexistent
OP evidence of "Center" Nonexistent
OP evidence of any political content at all: Nonexistent

For further study, see "burden of proof". See also "proving the negative".

What the **** is wrong with the Center? I just bought an ice cream cone and there's no jimmies on it!! **** every ******* one of you!!

You keep missing the point, I don't care it you don't like my post, if I am wrong it should be easy to prove. Either provide evidence I am wrong, or keep whining.