What the hell happened Truthers?

where would you do this screaming ...in the free speech zone ?....certainly not ground zero first responders are not even welcome there..the Jefferson memorial ?...no

RT's Adam Kokesh brutally arrested for dancing at Jefferson Memorial - YouTube

Damn....you are a big pussy

You think your government killed 3000 Americans and you are afraid to protest because you are afraid of the man?

You just spent ten years cutting and pasting truther you tubes describing the worst atrocity in US history and you are afraid to leave the house?

What a phony

I have been arrested for protest before and could be again.I have publicly distributed informational cds...I have concerns...but I am fearless
AmericanIdolSimonCowell.jpg
 
I have been arrested for protest before and could be again.I have publicly distributed informational cds...I have concerns...but I am fearless

Where were you today iots?

Where were the thousands of truther converts who are outraged about a government that murders it's own citizens? You have had ten years to gain any evidence to support truther theories and all you have is today's pathetic showing of your noble cause

I question the willingness of your group to put down the keyboard and actually make a difference

Today was your final exam.........you have FAILED miserably

why are you under the delusion you set the decide what is success... resistance is victory and the battle is fought on many fronts...btw what evidence do you have that proves the column 79 theory ? or do you even know what it is ?
AmericanIdolSimonCowell.jpg
 
And even after 10 years they don't understand. No one has to prove the findings of the official investigations. If you disagree with them it is up to you to prove otherwise....... It still hasn't been done.......
it seems that their specious speculation should be enough .."evidence we don't need no stinkin' evidence"!
 
any group that has to call themselves "patriots" are not..patriotism is ubiquitous.
any group that finds it necessary to proclaim that their criticism is "RESPONSIBLE"MUST HAVE HUGE PROBLEM with credibility..or they would not need to announce that it was.
You mean sorta like when all the pushers of the OCT BS wear little American flag lapel pins?
You can't seem to answer their positions, so you resort to questioning their "Patriotism"? Fucking loser..
Any one who loves their country and questions such an event as 9-11 is exercising their rights, something people like you would like to have taken away.

3 buildings with 2 planes, with descent times and straight down 'collapses" blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, who just happened to by pass NORAD, and magically have one of their passports sail out of the "massive inferno" when the OCT story claims super high temps, and all you can come up with is personal attacks and questioning the truth movements "patriotism"?
 
why are you under the delusion you set the decide what is success... resistance is victory and the battle is fought on many fronts...btw what evidence do you have that proves the column 79 theory ? or do you even know what it is ?

Ten years iots ........ten years to gather evidence, convince others of the validity of your position, gather converts and show the world that your movement needs to be taken seriously

You didnt even try today my friend...you seemed to know beforehand that your movement is irrelevant.

you dont even know what the nist theory is... nipplehead
Oedipus syndrome strikes!
 
any group that has to call themselves "patriots" are not..patriotism is ubiquitous.
any group that finds it necessary to proclaim that their criticism is "RESPONSIBLE"MUST HAVE HUGE PROBLEM with credibility..or they would not need to announce that it was.
You mean sorta like when all the pushers of the OCT BS wear little American flag lapel pins?
You can't seem to answer their positions, so you resort to questioning their "Patriotism"? Fucking loser..
Any one who loves their country and questions such an event as 9-11 is exercising their rights, something people like you would like to have taken away.

3 buildings with 2 planes, with descent times and straight down 'collapses" blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, who just happened to by pass NORAD, and magically have one of their passports sail out of the "massive inferno" when the OCT story claims super high temps, and all you can come up with is personal attacks and questioning the truth movements "patriotism"?
060914NewDesecrater-X.gif
 
And even after 10 years they don't understand. No one has to prove the findings of the official investigations. If you disagree with them it is up to you to prove otherwise....... It still hasn't been done.......

BS, It has been proven and shown that the OCT and NIST is flawed, inaccurate and fucked up.They have NOT proven their own "conspiracy" theory and this has been pointed out many times. You must demand the same burden pf proof to the OCT and NIST, but you do not do so. In fact the other theories actually have MORE credence, then the fable of 19 Arabs hijackers with box cutters.

The tests NIST did were not accurate, the fuel loading was not right, the fire proofing test was BS and unfounded, and the collapses caused by localized aircraft impact and the resulting fires, leading to straight down global destruction has been shown to be a farce.
Where is your proof that WTC 7 collapsed the way NIST said it did?
Why do they hide their computer simulation data/program?

Proof? NIST has NOT shown any proof, but there is much proof that shows they're wrong. The true nature of the ‘collapse’ of the World Trade Center towers is revealed in the presence of molten steel underneath the sites. We are not talking about steel heated to the point of weakening, we are talking about steel being turned into a liquid. Steel melts at approximately 2,700 degrees F.
Even under optimum conditions and given all the time in the world, it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to melt steel, as jet fuel burns at approximately or 550 degrees F.

Firefighters and first responders have witnessed molten steel at the sites. NIST engineer John Gross desperately tried to deny the presence of molten steel when told of witness testimonies together with NASA thermal imaging photography that demonstrates the intense heat present at GZ weeks after the event.
Is this what you call proof....denial?

Countless eyewitnesses have testified to explosions in the WTC buildings even before the impact of the planes, and nowhere near the impact points of the planes, including the basement levels.
So in your fantasy world, ignoring this is proof that NIST and the OCT is correct?

It is obvious that the three towers were demolished with something other than fire and gravity alone.
No rational adult can disagree with this in light of the evidence. Al Qaeda could not possibly have rigged the towers for a controlled demolition.
Not only would this require technology and expertise that is far beyond their capability, but it would require access to the high security buildings beforehand, something which could only be attained with official complicity.

Your brain seems to bypass the nature, manner, and speeds of the collapses, and rely on an entity that has lied to you in the past many times, and who has not even proven that what they theorized could actually be possible.

3 buildings destroyed by 2 planes, bypassing NORAD, ignoring the laws of physics, and blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, what a crock of shit you believe, and you have the nerve to call for proof against this lunacy? After it has been posted and linked for you countless times, throughout the years here and elsewhere.

You are a nutcase, in extreme denial of reality and of real facts presented. Maybe it is all just too hard for you to process, maybe it is just laziness, or you're really afraid it will make sense, whatever the reasons, you sound foolish when continually asking for proof that NIST and the OCT is flawed or untrue, all the while sticking up for what they say DESPITE no solid proof of what they told you.

The 9-11 attacks were a LIHOP, or a MIHOP scenario, and ignoring and dismissing the proof that has been uncovered and shown is the highest form of ignorance that you continuously display.
 
And even after 10 years they don't understand. No one has to prove the findings of the official investigations. If you disagree with them it is up to you to prove otherwise....... It still hasn't been done.......

BS, It has been proven and shown that the OCT and NIST is flawed, inaccurate and fucked up.They have NOT proven their own "conspiracy" theory and this has been pointed out many times. You must demand the same burden pf proof to the OCT and NIST, but you do not do so. In fact the other theories actually have MORE credence, then the fable of 19 Arabs hijackers with box cutters.

The tests NIST did were not accurate, the fuel loading was not right, the fire proofing test was BS and unfounded, and the collapses caused by localized aircraft impact and the resulting fires, leading to straight down global destruction has been shown to be a farce.
Where is your proof that WTC 7 collapsed the way NIST said it did?
Why do they hide their computer simulation data/program?

Proof? NIST has NOT shown any proof, but there is much proof that shows they're wrong. The true nature of the ‘collapse’ of the World Trade Center towers is revealed in the presence of molten steel underneath the sites. We are not talking about steel heated to the point of weakening, we are talking about steel being turned into a liquid. Steel melts at approximately 2,700 degrees F.
Even under optimum conditions and given all the time in the world, it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to melt steel, as jet fuel burns at approximately or 550 degrees F.

Firefighters and first responders have witnessed molten steel at the sites. NIST engineer John Gross desperately tried to deny the presence of molten steel when told of witness testimonies together with NASA thermal imaging photography that demonstrates the intense heat present at GZ weeks after the event.
Is this what you call proof....denial?

Countless eyewitnesses have testified to explosions in the WTC buildings even before the impact of the planes, and nowhere near the impact points of the planes, including the basement levels.
So in your fantasy world, ignoring this is proof that NIST and the OCT is correct?

It is obvious that the three towers were demolished with something other than fire and gravity alone.
No rational adult can disagree with this in light of the evidence. Al Qaeda could not possibly have rigged the towers for a controlled demolition.
Not only would this require technology and expertise that is far beyond their capability, but it would require access to the high security buildings beforehand, something which could only be attained with official complicity.

Your brain seems to bypass the nature, manner, and speeds of the collapses, and rely on an entity that has lied to you in the past many times, and who has not even proven that what they theorized could actually be possible.

3 buildings destroyed by 2 planes, bypassing NORAD, ignoring the laws of physics, and blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, what a crock of shit you believe, and you have the nerve to call for proof against this lunacy? After it has been posted and linked for you countless times, throughout the years here and elsewhere.

You are a nutcase, in extreme denial of reality and of real facts presented. Maybe it is all just too hard for you to process, maybe it is just laziness, or you're really afraid it will make sense, whatever the reasons, you sound foolish when continually asking for proof that NIST and the OCT is flawed or untrue, all the while sticking up for what they say DESPITE no solid proof of what they told you.

The 9-11 attacks were a LIHOP, or a MIHOP scenario, and ignoring and dismissing the proof that has been uncovered and shown is the highest form of ignorance that you continuously display.
steamingpileofpoo.jpg
 
God Damn eots

It's midnight on 9-11 and all you can do is post feeble YouTube videos?


Can your response to 9-11 be any more pathetic?

absolutely...it could be as pathetic as yours...as pathetic as it gets

Well looks like you and your internet buddies muddled throug another 9-11. Looking back. your movement didn't get any camera time, no stories about the truther movement and claims, no protests....no nothing

Do you need any more evidence that you no longer exist outside of interweb chat rooms?

But hey.....keep posting those truther links. You do keep us entertained

I guess you fail to understand that the 9-11 truth movement is being ignored, ridiculed and minimized by the MSM. It certainly does exist
and has gained ground, all over the world, but you would have to understand that the MSM is complicit with keeping this under wraps as much as possible.
If you still believe that 19 Arabs with box cutters and poor flying skills, by passed NORAD, achieved a 75% target success rate, and managed to destroy 3 massive buildings with jet fuel, and gravity alone, then it's no wonder you wouldn't understand the MSMs reasons for ignoring the credible people who have proven the fable that you believe is BS, and unscientifically improbable.

But you keep on believing in the fantasy you were told, it's in the same realm as Santa Claus and his flying reindeer. :lol:
 
And even after 10 years they don't understand. No one has to prove the findings of the official investigations. If you disagree with them it is up to you to prove otherwise....... It still hasn't been done.......

BS, It has been proven and shown that the OCT and NIST is flawed, inaccurate and fucked up.They have NOT proven their own "conspiracy" theory and this has been pointed out many times. You must demand the same burden pf proof to the OCT and NIST, but you do not do so. In fact the other theories actually have MORE credence, then the fable of 19 Arabs hijackers with box cutters.

The tests NIST did were not accurate, the fuel loading was not right, the fire proofing test was BS and unfounded, and the collapses caused by localized aircraft impact and the resulting fires, leading to straight down global destruction has been shown to be a farce.
Where is your proof that WTC 7 collapsed the way NIST said it did?
Why do they hide their computer simulation data/program?

Proof? NIST has NOT shown any proof, but there is much proof that shows they're wrong. The true nature of the ‘collapse’ of the World Trade Center towers is revealed in the presence of molten steel underneath the sites. We are not talking about steel heated to the point of weakening, we are talking about steel being turned into a liquid. Steel melts at approximately 2,700 degrees F.
Even under optimum conditions and given all the time in the world, it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to melt steel, as jet fuel burns at approximately or 550 degrees F.

Firefighters and first responders have witnessed molten steel at the sites. NIST engineer John Gross desperately tried to deny the presence of molten steel when told of witness testimonies together with NASA thermal imaging photography that demonstrates the intense heat present at GZ weeks after the event.
Is this what you call proof....denial?

Countless eyewitnesses have testified to explosions in the WTC buildings even before the impact of the planes, and nowhere near the impact points of the planes, including the basement levels.
So in your fantasy world, ignoring this is proof that NIST and the OCT is correct?

It is obvious that the three towers were demolished with something other than fire and gravity alone.
No rational adult can disagree with this in light of the evidence. Al Qaeda could not possibly have rigged the towers for a controlled demolition.
Not only would this require technology and expertise that is far beyond their capability, but it would require access to the high security buildings beforehand, something which could only be attained with official complicity.

Your brain seems to bypass the nature, manner, and speeds of the collapses, and rely on an entity that has lied to you in the past many times, and who has not even proven that what they theorized could actually be possible.

3 buildings destroyed by 2 planes, bypassing NORAD, ignoring the laws of physics, and blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, what a crock of shit you believe, and you have the nerve to call for proof against this lunacy? After it has been posted and linked for you countless times, throughout the years here and elsewhere.

You are a nutcase, in extreme denial of reality and of real facts presented. Maybe it is all just too hard for you to process, maybe it is just laziness, or you're really afraid it will make sense, whatever the reasons, you sound foolish when continually asking for proof that NIST and the OCT is flawed or untrue, all the while sticking up for what they say DESPITE no solid proof of what they told you.

The 9-11 attacks were a LIHOP, or a MIHOP scenario, and ignoring and dismissing the proof that has been uncovered and shown is the highest form of ignorance that you continuously display.
steamingpileofpoo.jpg

Typical response indicating your level of intelligence to rebuttal the claims made. Actually your image best describes the NIST and the OCT.
 
BS, It has been proven and shown that the OCT and NIST is flawed, inaccurate and fucked up.They have NOT proven their own "conspiracy" theory and this has been pointed out many times. You must demand the same burden pf proof to the OCT and NIST, but you do not do so. In fact the other theories actually have MORE credence, then the fable of 19 Arabs hijackers with box cutters.

The tests NIST did were not accurate, the fuel loading was not right, the fire proofing test was BS and unfounded, and the collapses caused by localized aircraft impact and the resulting fires, leading to straight down global destruction has been shown to be a farce.
Where is your proof that WTC 7 collapsed the way NIST said it did?
Why do they hide their computer simulation data/program?

Proof? NIST has NOT shown any proof, but there is much proof that shows they're wrong. The true nature of the ‘collapse’ of the World Trade Center towers is revealed in the presence of molten steel underneath the sites. We are not talking about steel heated to the point of weakening, we are talking about steel being turned into a liquid. Steel melts at approximately 2,700 degrees F.
Even under optimum conditions and given all the time in the world, it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to melt steel, as jet fuel burns at approximately or 550 degrees F.

Firefighters and first responders have witnessed molten steel at the sites. NIST engineer John Gross desperately tried to deny the presence of molten steel when told of witness testimonies together with NASA thermal imaging photography that demonstrates the intense heat present at GZ weeks after the event.
Is this what you call proof....denial?

Countless eyewitnesses have testified to explosions in the WTC buildings even before the impact of the planes, and nowhere near the impact points of the planes, including the basement levels.
So in your fantasy world, ignoring this is proof that NIST and the OCT is correct?

It is obvious that the three towers were demolished with something other than fire and gravity alone.
No rational adult can disagree with this in light of the evidence. Al Qaeda could not possibly have rigged the towers for a controlled demolition.
Not only would this require technology and expertise that is far beyond their capability, but it would require access to the high security buildings beforehand, something which could only be attained with official complicity.

Your brain seems to bypass the nature, manner, and speeds of the collapses, and rely on an entity that has lied to you in the past many times, and who has not even proven that what they theorized could actually be possible.

3 buildings destroyed by 2 planes, bypassing NORAD, ignoring the laws of physics, and blamed on 19 Arabs with box cutters, what a crock of shit you believe, and you have the nerve to call for proof against this lunacy? After it has been posted and linked for you countless times, throughout the years here and elsewhere.

You are a nutcase, in extreme denial of reality and of real facts presented. Maybe it is all just too hard for you to process, maybe it is just laziness, or you're really afraid it will make sense, whatever the reasons, you sound foolish when continually asking for proof that NIST and the OCT is flawed or untrue, all the while sticking up for what they say DESPITE no solid proof of what they told you.

The 9-11 attacks were a LIHOP, or a MIHOP scenario, and ignoring and dismissing the proof that has been uncovered and shown is the highest form of ignorance that you continuously display.
steamingpileofpoo.jpg

Typical response indicating your level of intelligence to rebuttal the claims made. Actually your image best describes the NIST and the OCT.
actually the photo precisely describes your unending dogma spewing ,if you had even a reasonable amount of intelligence you would have understood that ,(as in a picture paints a thousand words)

as to the content of your missives ,they are just a rehash of debunked garbage that is made up of lies ,rumors fairy tales,pseudo science,ignorance, superstition,and plain ol ordinary stupidity..BTW how much do you charge for your"informational" books and videos?
 
absolutely...it could be as pathetic as yours...as pathetic as it gets

Well looks like you and your internet buddies muddled throug another 9-11. Looking back. your movement didn't get any camera time, no stories about the truther movement and claims, no protests....no nothing

Do you need any more evidence that you no longer exist outside of interweb chat rooms?

But hey.....keep posting those truther links. You do keep us entertained

I guess you fail to understand that the 9-11 truth movement is being ignored, ridiculed and minimized by the MSM. It certainly does exist
and has gained ground, all over the world, but you would have to understand that the MSM is complicit with keeping this under wraps as much as possible.
If you still believe that 19 Arabs with box cutters and poor flying skills, by passed NORAD, achieved a 75% target success rate, and managed to destroy 3 massive buildings with jet fuel, and gravity alone, then it's no wonder you wouldn't understand the MSMs reasons for ignoring the credible people who have proven the fable that you believe is BS, and unscientifically improbable.

But you keep on believing in the fantasy you were told, it's in the same realm as Santa Claus and his flying reindeer. :lol:
Hey dumbass!.....since you're such a gullible idiot, i've got prime oceanfront property for sale in Palm Springs, complete with a white sandy beach, and a mega yacht anchored jst offshore.......Wanna buy it all?.....I'll give ya' a great deal!......Let me know!
 
any group that has to call themselves "patriots" are not..patriotism is ubiquitous.
any group that finds it necessary to proclaim that their criticism is "RESPONSIBLE"MUST HAVE HUGE PROBLEM with credibility..or they would not need to announce that it was.

says who ?
says I !!!!!!

IF memory serves, they gave themselves that name to distance the group from what they considered the more extreme wing of the truth movement..or in other words the even less responsible patriots.
 
absolutely...it could be as pathetic as yours...as pathetic as it gets

Well looks like you and your internet buddies muddled throug another 9-11. Looking back. your movement didn't get any camera time, no stories about the truther movement and claims, no protests....no nothing

Do you need any more evidence that you no longer exist outside of interweb chat rooms?

But hey.....keep posting those truther links. You do keep us entertained

I guess you fail to understand that the 9-11 truth movement is being ignored, ridiculed and minimized by the MSM. It certainly does exist
and has gained ground, all over the world, but you would have to understand that the MSM is complicit with keeping this under wraps as much as possible.
If you still believe that 19 Arabs with box cutters and poor flying skills, by passed NORAD, achieved a 75% target success rate, and managed to destroy 3 massive buildings with jet fuel, and gravity alone, then it's no wonder you wouldn't understand the MSMs reasons for ignoring the credible people who have proven the fable that you believe is BS, and unscientifically improbable.

But you keep on believing in the fantasy you were told, it's in the same realm as Santa Claus and his flying reindeer. :lol:

Where were you yesterday??

It is hard for the media to ignore tens of thousands of people storming the streets because the US Government intentionally pushed a button and blew up the towers killing 3000 Americans

Thats what you believe right? So where were you yesterday?
 
Well looks like you and your internet buddies muddled throug another 9-11. Looking back. your movement didn't get any camera time, no stories about the truther movement and claims, no protests....no nothing

Do you need any more evidence that you no longer exist outside of interweb chat rooms?

But hey.....keep posting those truther links. You do keep us entertained

I guess you fail to understand that the 9-11 truth movement is being ignored, ridiculed and minimized by the MSM. It certainly does exist
and has gained ground, all over the world, but you would have to understand that the MSM is complicit with keeping this under wraps as much as possible.
If you still believe that 19 Arabs with box cutters and poor flying skills, by passed NORAD, achieved a 75% target success rate, and managed to destroy 3 massive buildings with jet fuel, and gravity alone, then it's no wonder you wouldn't understand the MSMs reasons for ignoring the credible people who have proven the fable that you believe is BS, and unscientifically improbable.

But you keep on believing in the fantasy you were told, it's in the same realm as Santa Claus and his flying reindeer. :lol:

Where were you yesterday??

It is hard for the media to ignore tens of thousands of people storming the streets because the US Government intentionally pushed a button and blew up the towers killing 3000 Americans

Thats what you believe right? So where were you yesterday?
I was laying in bed last night listening to Phil Hendrie on the radio. He took a break, so I moved the dial over and sure enough, on Coast to Coast AM, the twoofers were cackling like caged hens. One dude was trying so hard to make his loony case that he just about hyperventilated from talking so fast. The host had to cut him short out of fear he would die on the air......Talk about a comedic freak show.:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top