What The Hell Does A Normal American Need An Army Assault Weapon For.....Target Practice?

[OKTexas]

It's also double action, one trigger pull one round fired, next round advances automatically, isn't that what regressives call an automatic weapon?

Yeah you just thought it was automatic and now you are a gun expert. Funny.

It operates just like a semi-auto, just doesn't have the capacity. You idiots call semi-autos automatics all the time.

I don't.

Well maybe your time would be better spent trying to educate your fellow regressives. They might even believe your BS stats.

Which ones are BS?

Well I take the time to give you one. Didn't you say 1.5 million DGU's were a fictitious number? Was it?

Now run along child, my leg is getting tired from kicking you ass. I'm done with you fictitious little thread.

 

[Brain357]

Yeah you just thought it was automatic and now you are a gun expert. Funny.

It operates just like a semi-auto, just doesn't have the capacity. You idiots call semi-autos automatics all the time.

I don't.

Well maybe your time would be better spent trying to educate your fellow regressives. They might even believe your BS stats.

Which ones are BS?

Well I take the time to give you one. Didn't you say 1.5 million DGU's were a fictitious number? Was it?

Now run along child, my leg is getting tired from kicking you ass. I'm done with you fictitious little thread.

It is still fictitious moron. The CDC did not estimate dgu.

 

[OKTexas]

One pull of the trigger one round fired. No different than the terrorists gun.

The terrorist would have been greatly slowed with a revolver. You really don't know guns.

Really, I know guys that can speed load a revolver faster than I can change a magazine. The advantage of the pistol vs the revolver, is you don't have to reload as often, but a revolver can be reloaded quickly.

Yes. Speed loaders are harder to carry and it takes far more practice. Most the mass shooters buy the guns just before the shooting. And you are a moron if you think a revolver would have killed and injured just as many.

Given 3 hours, you're fucking nuts.

Are you a moron? He didn't have 3 hours. He shot most in minutes. Then police had him in the bathroom with hostages. The hostage situation took hours.

Wrong, the police didn't even enter the building for three hours, they were worried he might have a bomb.

 

[OKTexas]

It operates just like a semi-auto, just doesn't have the capacity. You idiots call semi-autos automatics all the time.

I don't.

Well maybe your time would be better spent trying to educate your fellow regressives. They might even believe your BS stats.

Which ones are BS?

Well I take the time to give you one. Didn't you say 1.5 million DGU's were a fictitious number? Was it?

Now run along child, my leg is getting tired from kicking you ass. I'm done with you fictitious little thread.

It is still fictitious moron. The CDC did not estimate dgu.

BYE troll.

 

[320 Years of History]

Examples.

Don't need any because I am not trying to tell other people how much ammo they need you are

My CHL instructor said if a cop asked why you shot the guy 5 times. Your answer should be, because 4 wasn't enough and 6 would have been too many. Cops are trained to shoot until the suspect goes down, CHLs are taught to fire until there is no longer a threat. Neutralizing the threat is what it's all about.

And there is no determined set amount of rounds fired before the threat is neutralized like BrainDead seems to think

And 0 examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense. Sure are lots of mass killers using them though.

Tell that to folks defending a business against riots.

Non-lethal tools for defending a business against rioters:

​

Of course, the security devices pictured above are not going to 100% effective against supremely determined rioters who aim to invade a business; however, if there are that many of them who are committed to assaulting the shop owner or employee, a gun, or many guns, isn't going to stop them either. The rioters that took over the U.S. Embassy in Iran showed us that much is so.

A far more reliable and far less deadly means for dissuading people from rioting is not to do things and implement policies that are bound to piss off a sh*tload of people. Collaboration is far more effective than is confrontation, which does little but give rise to the motivation for escalation.

​

 

[Brain357]

The terrorist would have been greatly slowed with a revolver. You really don't know guns.

Really, I know guys that can speed load a revolver faster than I can change a magazine. The advantage of the pistol vs the revolver, is you don't have to reload as often, but a revolver can be reloaded quickly.

Yes. Speed loaders are harder to carry and it takes far more practice. Most the mass shooters buy the guns just before the shooting. And you are a moron if you think a revolver would have killed and injured just as many.

Given 3 hours, you're fucking nuts.

Are you a moron? He didn't have 3 hours. He shot most in minutes. Then police had him in the bathroom with hostages. The hostage situation took hours.

Wrong, the police didn't even enter the building for three hours, they were worried he might have a bomb.

Wrong again stupid.

Around 2:02 a.m. ET: An officer working extra duty in uniform at the club hears gunshots and engages the shooter. The officer feels he is outgunned, retreats from the club, and calls for assistance. Two SWAT officers in a nearby patrol car are among units that respond and a gunbattle ensues.
Other patrol officers rush into the club during the shootout to pull survivors out.
The shooter retreats and after exchanging gunfire with a SWAT lieutenant in a hallway he barricades himself and clubgoers in a bathroom.

2:05 a.m. ET: Patience Carter says the shooter enters the bathroom and shoots several people hiding there. People scream and scramble as blood flies. Then the gunman stops shooting.

 

[Brain357]

I don't.

Well maybe your time would be better spent trying to educate your fellow regressives. They might even believe your BS stats.

Which ones are BS?

Well I take the time to give you one. Didn't you say 1.5 million DGU's were a fictitious number? Was it?

Now run along child, my leg is getting tired from kicking you ass. I'm done with you fictitious little thread.

It is still fictitious moron. The CDC did not estimate dgu.

BYE troll.

Won't miss your lies.

 

[Bush92]

To stop a Marxist takeover of out constitutional republic. (See Minutemen)

 

[saveliberty]

So when the local police are out gunned, they can come to my house and borrow one?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Don't need any because I am not trying to tell other people how much ammo they need you are

My CHL instructor said if a cop asked why you shot the guy 5 times. Your answer should be, because 4 wasn't enough and 6 would have been too many. Cops are trained to shoot until the suspect goes down, CHLs are taught to fire until there is no longer a threat. Neutralizing the threat is what it's all about.

And there is no determined set amount of rounds fired before the threat is neutralized like BrainDead seems to think

And 0 examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense. Sure are lots of mass killers using them though.

Tell that to folks defending a business against riots.

Non-lethal tools for defending a business against rioters:

​

Of course, the security devices pictured above are not going to 100% effective against supremely determined rioters who aim to invade a business; however, if there are that many of them who are committed to assaulting the shop owner or employee, a gun, or many guns, isn't going to stop them either. The rioters that took over the U.S. Embassy in Iran showed us that much is so.

A far more reliable and far less deadly means for dissuading people from rioting is not to do things and implement policies that are bound to piss off a sh*tload of people. Collaboration is far more effective than is confrontation, which does little but give rise to the motivation for escalation.

​

So they then burn your place to the ground instead.

 

[320 Years of History]

My CHL instructor said if a cop asked why you shot the guy 5 times. Your answer should be, because 4 wasn't enough and 6 would have been too many. Cops are trained to shoot until the suspect goes down, CHLs are taught to fire until there is no longer a threat. Neutralizing the threat is what it's all about.

And there is no determined set amount of rounds fired before the threat is neutralized like BrainDead seems to think

And 0 examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense. Sure are lots of mass killers using them though.

Tell that to folks defending a business against riots.

Non-lethal tools for defending a business against rioters:

​

Of course, the security devices pictured above are not going to 100% effective against supremely determined rioters who aim to invade a business; however, if there are that many of them who are committed to assaulting the shop owner or employee, a gun, or many guns, isn't going to stop them either. The rioters that took over the U.S. Embassy in Iran showed us that much is so.

A far more reliable and far less deadly means for dissuading people from rioting is not to do things and implement policies that are bound to piss off a sh*tload of people. Collaboration is far more effective than is confrontation, which does little but give rise to the motivation for escalation.

​

So they then burn your place to the ground instead.

Red:
Maybe they do, but guns aren't going to stop that from happening.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Gotta love how brainless finds this funny....

All burned to the ground by friendly protesters.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And there is no determined set amount of rounds fired before the threat is neutralized like BrainDead seems to think

And 0 examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense. Sure are lots of mass killers using them though.

Tell that to folks defending a business against riots.

Non-lethal tools for defending a business against rioters:

​

Of course, the security devices pictured above are not going to 100% effective against supremely determined rioters who aim to invade a business; however, if there are that many of them who are committed to assaulting the shop owner or employee, a gun, or many guns, isn't going to stop them either. The rioters that took over the U.S. Embassy in Iran showed us that much is so.

A far more reliable and far less deadly means for dissuading people from rioting is not to do things and implement policies that are bound to piss off a sh*tload of people. Collaboration is far more effective than is confrontation, which does little but give rise to the motivation for escalation.

​

So they then burn your place to the ground instead.

Red:
Maybe they do, but guns aren't going to stop that from happening.

Sure they would.
A couple of guys on the roof with firearms could easily keep Molotov tossers out of range.

 

[Brain357]

Gotta love how brainless finds this funny....
View attachment 78921
All burned to the ground by friendly protesters.

It is funny you think guns are the answer. How about insurance?

 

[Papageorgio]

Many? How many? Do you have the links?

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

So you have nothing? Just your idea, which in this thread you have been

Many? How many? Do you have the links?

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

Who has been stopped at reload? Links? You claimed "Many shooters have been stopped at reload" Do you have proof or are you going to continue to babble BS?

Giffords shooting and others.

Giffords is one, do you have ANY links to others? You seem to be side stepping the issue. If there are many as you claim, you should be able to find dozens and dozens of links.

UPDATE: SPU Staff Disarmed Shooter While He Was Reloading - The Truth About Guns

People escape every mass shooting.

So two is many for you? Interesting hypothesis based on two and I don't trust anti or pro gun sites as both are prone to bias and.

Many? How many? Do you have the links?

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

So you have nothing? Just your idea, which in this thread you have been

Many? How many? Do you have the links?

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

Who has been stopped at reload? Links? You claimed "Many shooters have been stopped at reload" Do you have proof or are you going to continue to babble BS?

Giffords shooting and others.

Giffords is one, do you have ANY links to others? You seem to be side stepping the issue. If there are many as you claim, you should be able to find dozens and dozens of links.

UPDATE: SPU Staff Disarmed Shooter While He Was Reloading - The Truth About Guns

People escape every mass shooting.

You a a person caught in 2011 and 2014 reloading and you call that many? I also tried the links on your anti gun web page and it linked to nothing. I don't trust pro or anti gun sites.

So, two cases in 5 years is many, is that what you are saying? Your evidence is flimsy at best.

 

[Brain357]

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

So you have nothing? Just your idea, which in this thread you have been

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

Who has been stopped at reload? Links? You claimed "Many shooters have been stopped at reload" Do you have proof or are you going to continue to babble BS?

Giffords shooting and others.

Giffords is one, do you have ANY links to others? You seem to be side stepping the issue. If there are many as you claim, you should be able to find dozens and dozens of links.

UPDATE: SPU Staff Disarmed Shooter While He Was Reloading - The Truth About Guns

People escape every mass shooting.

So two is many for you? Interesting hypothesis based on two and I don't trust anti or pro gun sites as both are prone to bias and.

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

So you have nothing? Just your idea, which in this thread you have been

Every mass shooting has people who escaped. Reloading helped many of them.

Who has been stopped at reload? Links? You claimed "Many shooters have been stopped at reload" Do you have proof or are you going to continue to babble BS?

Giffords shooting and others.

Giffords is one, do you have ANY links to others? You seem to be side stepping the issue. If there are many as you claim, you should be able to find dozens and dozens of links.

UPDATE: SPU Staff Disarmed Shooter While He Was Reloading - The Truth About Guns

People escape every mass shooting.

You a a person caught in 2011 and 2014 reloading and you call that many? I also tried the links on your anti gun web page and it linked to nothing. I don't trust pro or anti gun sites.

So, two cases in 5 years is many, is that what you are saying? Your evidence is flimsy at best.

Those were people stopped. EVERY mass shooting has people who escape. Every reload saves lives.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Gotta love how brainless finds this funny....
View attachment 78921
All burned to the ground by friendly protesters.

It is funny you think guns are the answer. How about insurance?

You going to pay for the loss of business and increase in insurance premiums for the whole area?
Yeah....thats what I thought.

 

[JoeMoma]

Some guns and accessories are more efficient killing tools than others. Can everyone agree on that point?

 

[OKTexas]

Don't need any because I am not trying to tell other people how much ammo they need you are

My CHL instructor said if a cop asked why you shot the guy 5 times. Your answer should be, because 4 wasn't enough and 6 would have been too many. Cops are trained to shoot until the suspect goes down, CHLs are taught to fire until there is no longer a threat. Neutralizing the threat is what it's all about.

And there is no determined set amount of rounds fired before the threat is neutralized like BrainDead seems to think

And 0 examples of anyone needing a hi cap mag for defense. Sure are lots of mass killers using them though.

Tell that to folks defending a business against riots.

Non-lethal tools for defending a business against rioters:

​

Of course, the security devices pictured above are not going to 100% effective against supremely determined rioters who aim to invade a business; however, if there are that many of them who are committed to assaulting the shop owner or employee, a gun, or many guns, isn't going to stop them either. The rioters that took over the U.S. Embassy in Iran showed us that much is so.

A far more reliable and far less deadly means for dissuading people from rioting is not to do things and implement policies that are bound to piss off a sh*tload of people. Collaboration is far more effective than is confrontation, which does little but give rise to the motivation for escalation.

​

Any of those could be defeated in under 4 minutes by two people, with a tire iron, vehicle and a chain. Locks and barriers only keep honest people and lazy crooks honest. Non rioters break into stores in Houston all the time with vehicles to steal ATMs.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Some guns and accessories are more efficient killing tools than others. Can everyone agree on that point?

To a certain extent yes,but it has more to do with who's pulling the trigger.