What should be done to reduce mass shootings? (Poll)

Do you support any of the OP suggested ways to reduce mass shootings?

  • 1. AI scours the internet for probable shooters, triggers a red-flag

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • 2. Gun Control

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • 3. Hold parents legally responsible for their kid's actions

    Votes: 7 18.9%
  • 4. Re-open insane asylums, primarily outpatient

    Votes: 17 45.9%
  • 5. No action

    Votes: 3 8.1%

  • Total voters
    37
Hilarious

Are not all white mass murders good law abiding citizens until they’re not.

46,000+ people killed by guns in our country every year.

26x the average of every other advanced country.
Most of those are suicides. So again it is illogical to punish hundreds of millions of peaceable law abiding citizens for the bad acts of a few.

Keep your hands off of my firearms.
 
Hilarious

Are not all white mass murders good law abiding citizens until they’re not.

46,000+ people killed by guns in our country every year.

26x the average of every other advanced country.



Re:
Are not all white mass murders good law abiding citizens until they’re not.

I don't know. Isn't it already against the law to murder someone?
What more do you want.

What's your point?

Re:
46,000+ people killed by guns in our country every year.

Please name one instance in which a gun killed anyone without being manipulated by a human.

Where did you get the figure 46,000?

Re:
26x the average of every other advanced country.

Inflated statistics and false comparisons.

Since no other country has the equivalent of our 2nd Amendment and more Americans are private gun owners than any other country, America should have the highest homicide rate in the entire world but there are about 60 countries that have higher homicide rates and prohibitions on private gun ownership with higher homicide rates.

Why?

Meanwhile "developed country" is a meaningless phrase coined by unethical enemies of our 2nd Amendment.

Thanks,

"The Mistake of Only Comparing US Murder Rates to "Developed" Countries"

EXCERPT " Note, however, that these comparisons always employ a carefully selected list of countries, most of which are very unlike the United States. They are countries that were settled long ago by the dominant ethnic group, they are ethnically non-diverse today, they are frequently very small countries (such as Norway, with a population of 5 million) with very locally based democracies (again, unlike the US with an immense population and far fewer representatives in government per voter). Politically, historically, and demographically, the US has little in common with Europe or Japan.

The US has the highest murder rate in the "developed world" — presumably because of its lax guns laws —we are told again and again.

Few people who repeat this mantra have any standard in their heads of what exactly is the "developed" world. They just repeat the phrase because they have learned to do so. They never acknowledge that when factors beyond per capita GDP are considered, it makes little sense to claim Sweden should be compared to the US, but not Argentina.

Such assertions ignore immense differences in culture, size, politics, history, demographics, or ethnic diversity. Comparisons with mono-ethnic Asian countries like Japan and Korea make even less sense"CONTINUED
 
Re:


I don't know. Isn't it already against the law to murder someone?
What more do you want.

What's your point?

Re:


Please name one instance in which a gun killed anyone without being manipulated by a human.

Where did you get the figure 46,000?

Re:


Inflated statistics and false comparisons.

Since no other country has the equivalent of our 2nd Amendment and more Americans are private gun owners than any other country, America should have the highest homicide rate in the entire world but there are about 60 countries that have higher homicide rates and prohibitions on private gun ownership with higher homicide rates.

Why?

Meanwhile "developed country" is a meaningless phrase coined by unethical enemies of our 2nd Amendment.

Thanks,

"The Mistake of Only Comparing US Murder Rates to "Developed" Countries"

EXCERPT " Note, however, that these comparisons always employ a carefully selected list of countries, most of which are very unlike the United States. They are countries that were settled long ago by the dominant ethnic group, they are ethnically non-diverse today, they are frequently very small countries (such as Norway, with a population of 5 million) with very locally based democracies (again, unlike the US with an immense population and far fewer representatives in government per voter). Politically, historically, and demographically, the US has little in common with Europe or Japan.

The US has the highest murder rate in the "developed world" — presumably because of its lax guns laws —we are told again and again.

Few people who repeat this mantra have any standard in their heads of what exactly is the "developed" world. They just repeat the phrase because they have learned to do so. They never acknowledge that when factors beyond per capita GDP are considered, it makes little sense to claim Sweden should be compared to the US, but not Argentina.

Such assertions ignore immense differences in culture, size, politics, history, demographics, or ethnic diversity. Comparisons with mono-ethnic Asian countries like Japan and Korea make even less sense"CONTINUED
46,000+ died by gun violence.

Is that acceptable to you?
 
Re-open insane asylums, primarily outpatient, Get these sick people off the streets.
They shouldn't be living in Democrat feces covered tent cities.
 
Re-open insane asylums, primarily outpatient, Get these sick people off the streets.
They shouldn't be living in Democrat feces covered tent cities.
Yes!

Get those white young men that commit murders!!!
 
46,000+ died by gun violence.

Is that acceptable to you?
How many of those were suicides?

You have to trump up the numbers to make it seem worse than it is. That’s weak tea.
 
How many of those were suicides?

You have to trump up the numbers to make it seem worse than it is. That’s weak tea.
Are you questioning the result?
 
15th post
Are you questioning the result?
Yes. I am. The gun violence rate is 3 per 100,000 which means you would punish 99,997 out of 100,000 for the bad acts of 3 out of 100,000.

Now do you understand?
 
Back
Top Bottom