Markle
Diamond Member
And the republicans in the senate blocked it.Yes, a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION URGING the release of the Muller report.
One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the republicans in the senate blocked it.Yes, a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION URGING the release of the Muller report.
Waaaaaah! They are demanding to see the full report! Who's going to protect dear leader?!?!?! WaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhView attachment 253911
View attachment 253912
We demand to see the full report...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....
One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?
One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?
It only came up, because someone made up a lie to the contrary. So go complain to that poster.
Oh , that's right. That was you.
You get a failing grade for copying...that's cheating....just like a libtard....cheating stealing killing anything goes as long as dembos win....Waaaaaah! They are demanding to see the full report! Who's going to protect dear leader?!?!?! WaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhView attachment 253911
View attachment 253912
We demand to see the full report...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....
![]()
![]()
What legal standing does Barr have to NOT release Mueller's report to Congress?
But that's irrelevant.We both know that whatever the democrats get will be released, one way or another.
How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.
How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.
OF COURSE it will be leaked.How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.
I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.
OF COURSE it will be leaked.How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.
I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.
Trump-hating Democrats / conspirators and Democrats have proven themselves to be a porous / leak-proof as a screen door on a submarine.
Sorry but what "you are afraid of" has no legal standingHow far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.
I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.
Can you imagine Spartacus and Schiff hearing a salacious secret? They'd kick over an old lady in a wheelchair if she was between them and a TV camera.
Neither does the continuous leaks of information by Trump-hating Democrats....Sorry but what "you are afraid of" has no legal standing
Let me 'splain in simple terms: The Democrats; continuous leaks of information are illegal; yet, they continue to do so anyway. You and other snowflakes trying to convince others that the President's personal tax information once in their hands will result in anything differently is a moronic waste of time.You do realize that your post makes no sense... right?
Oh? What law says the Attorney General can’t release the report?I guess Republicans don't want to win the Senate next year.Senate blocks resolution calling for public release of Robert Mueller's report after House voted 420-0False. Senate republicans blocked the vote.All Republicans voted to release it.
Please show us.![]()
I guess Democrats don't even try to hide that they consider winning more important than the law.
I guess Republicans don't want to win the Senate next year.Senate blocks resolution calling for public release of Robert Mueller's report after House voted 420-0False. Senate republicans blocked the vote.All Republicans voted to release it.
Please show us.![]()