<snip> for brevity but see immediately preceding posts for the full context. . . . .
In my experience, even when the left is pointing to someone and saying, "See? He wants to impose laws on people and intrude the government into their lives", they're mistaken as often as not.
I don't think passing a law that confirms the long-term status quo is imposing government on people. The laws - and worse, the court judgements - that that confirmation is attempting to head off, on the other hand, would be.
Well there is something to say for that too. That in itself would make an interesting discussion, yes?
The thing is that when a conservative states their beliefs about religion or a social concept or a traditional value, they are too often accused of trying to ram it down somebody's throat.
When a leftist comments on these things, they are exercising their right to free speech.
The left too often objects and points fingers and accuses the religious when they lobby their government. Violation of church and state and all that and trying to turn the country into a theocracy and all that.
But when the left lobbies for a social issue, they are simply exercising their Constitutional right to petition their government.
I'm sure the left thinks the right is more guilty of offenses and the right thinks the left is more guilty of such offenses, but the hypocrisy in all that does abound for sure.
But there are some on both the left and right who would want the federal government to enact dangerous universal laws. We modern American conservatives see that as whittling away at our unalienable rights and/or ability to govern ourselves. And we should continue to resist that regardless of who is pushing for it lest we all lose.