I believe M14 easily dispatched your point.It was a question that I know the answer to. Nothing emotional about it. I notice how you people always accuse others of being emotional when you have nothing else to offer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe M14 easily dispatched your point.It was a question that I know the answer to. Nothing emotional about it. I notice how you people always accuse others of being emotional when you have nothing else to offer
He was able to buy a gun because he was not, under the law, a prohibited person?Actually, it was because he was not committed by a Judge. The fact that he was not, is a loop hole
I understood your point.Did you totally fail to understand the point that I made about this?
I did not say that you did. I said that the 2nd is open to interpretationYou don;t have to be in a militia for your right to keep and bear arms to be protected by the 2nd
How long did it take for the police to arrive?You mean after he killed a cop that tried to stop him with two shots then got killed?
A cop was right there armed and got killed. The good guy with a gun lost this time.How long did it take for the police to arrive?
Can you answer the question , or not?
My response to you demonstrates that the points you tried to make are unsound.I did not say that you did. I said that the 2nd is open to interpretation
Really? The 2nd says that? Did a court decide that? How about Javelin missiles or Howitzers ?- The 2nd protects the right to own an use all bearable arms, including those that did not exist in 1791.
So no, you can't answer the question.A cop was right there armed and got killed. The good guy with a gun lost this time.
Nukes are arms.Really? The 2nd says that? Did a court decide that? How about Javelin missiles or Howitzers ?
I told you a cop was right there and got shot after putting two bullets in the guys armor.So no, you can't answer the question.
Yes.Really? The 2nd says that? Did a court decide that?
You don't get to decide if it is out of date. It sure works for me!You need gun laws, then you need decades of cultural change. Anyone who thinks they can create laws, expect results over night and no future incidents, is a retard and has no grip on the subject.
Various English speaking countries are where they are with minimal gun incidents due to decades of gun laws and regulations etc..
The first step in sorting America's gun problem out is ripping up that out of date constitution and drafting a one suitable for the present.
Yeah you are not socialized so we know the answer.
Not only can you not answer the question, you do not understand why the answewr is important.What part of a cop was right there when it happened and the good guy with a gun lost don't you understand gunner.
What part of a cop had a gun right there when it happened and lost don't you understand idiot.Not only can you not answer the question, you do not understand why the answewr is important.
Thank you .
There was a red flag law and he was simply let go without any action after he had a plan to shoot up his high school.Red flag laws. The conservative court I'm sure won't go for that.