What law(s) would have stopped the Buffalo shooting?

Fuck off Loser.

You telling us you did not attend public school?

1652732839927.png
 
What part of a cop was right there when it happened and the good guy with a gun lost don't you understand gunner.
 
Really? The 2nd says that? Did a court decide that?
Yes.
DC v Heller
Caetano v MA
Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment . We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997) , and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001) , the Second Amendment extends, prima facie,to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
 
You need gun laws, then you need decades of cultural change. Anyone who thinks they can create laws, expect results over night and no future incidents, is a retard and has no grip on the subject.

Various English speaking countries are where they are with minimal gun incidents due to decades of gun laws and regulations etc..

The first step in sorting America's gun problem out is ripping up that out of date constitution and drafting a one suitable for the present.
You don't get to decide if it is out of date. It sure works for me!
 
A cop was literally right there armed and couldn't kill the dude. And the good guy with a gun is being buried in a few days.
 

Forum List

Back
Top