Do you mean if I vote for a Democrat I immediately must want to confiscate your firearms? Only if you are a danger to Society and yourself. And then only if a Judge rules for your guns to be temporarily removed either by a Law Enforcement or another Family Member. And then, only until the condition either passes or it becomes necessary to have you committed. But before those guns can be removed, you MUST have your time in court to state your case. Welcome to Colorado.
Wrong. Democrats all over the country are trying to make guns illegal baby step by baby step. In the past they have made suggestions on ways to disarm the public without going too far that would involve a Supreme Court ruling.
If it's not private sales background checks, it's taxes on ammunition. If it's not taxes on ammunition, it's magazine capacity. If it's not magazine capacity, it's semi-automatic weapons. The list goes on and on.
New York newspaper removes gun permit database from website after outcry
Democrats propose $10,000 fine for gun owners who don’t have insurance
NY Gun Confiscation - Citizens Told to Turn in Firearms
\
New York City confiscating rifles and shotguns
Targeted? Gun sellers’ ‘high risk’ label from feds cuts banking options, hurts business
Senate Dems, Led by Feinstein, Introduce Assault Weapons Ban
New Jersey Declares War On Its Residents: Plans Door-To-Door Gun Confiscation Campaign
The Pauxsnews source has been redacted and removed from the net. It's made up. It's a lie. Someone made it up and Pawssnews ran with it.
Insurance? Now, that went a long ways. Yes, a handful wanted to treat guns like cars and drives licenses but it didn't amount to anything and went nowhere. MOST Democrats had a big laugh and moved on. Even so, it's not against the 2nd Amendment, each state can make that determination (none have done this but 3 have considered it) and it would change nothing. Let's face it, if you were required to have liability insurance to own a gun and couldn't get it, I would seriously question if you should own a gun in the first place. There would have to be a pretty damned good reason that the Insurance Company would turn you down. It sounds like a pretty good insurance scam for the insurance companies. But everyone had a good guffaw and moved on.
NY Gun Confiscation: Wow, what a reach on this one. The only ones that this affected were those that have a history using powerful psychotropic drugs. Is this a new market that the NRA wants to establish that they think they can exploit?. You are aware that anyone using illegal drugs by federal standards is not supposed to own firearms, don't you? I guess you support the Mass Murders since most of them have also been under those powerful drugs. Wow, if there aren't enough sickos with guns, we make more through chemistry.
NYC confiscating Rifles and Shotguns. Wow, another one. These are are for the internal ammo storage type like a pump shotgun or a standard top load rifle uses. These have been illegal for decades by Federal Standard. The exception to the rule is the 22 rifle that has no limit in it's tube. Shotguns with a capacity to hold more than 5 shells can be modified by placing a slug or spacer in the tube to prevent more than 5 round storage. And they haven't made a Rifle with internal ammo storage with more than 5 rounds for decades. I followed the links and here is what I found. It leads to another "Fantasy" site. And So It Begins: New York Sending Out Gun Confiscation Notices - The Truth About Guns
If you look at the supposed letter, you will notice that the only 3 entries on it where the owners are blanked out is for three 22 lr rifles to be turned in with more than 5 rounds. Newsflash: It's a friggin hoax. The 22LR Rifles are exempt and can hold as many shells as their tubes can take. Another Lie, or fake news.
Targeted Guns Sellers Where do you get this. You need to do standup comedy with this material. The Investigation was for Online Businesses that were at the highest rate of damage to the customers. It just so happens that many of them were Online Gun Dealers and Accessory Dealers. Most of those were shut down. Do you mean that if I were to put up a Gun Scam online that you would defend my right to do so? Must be, that's what you are doing here.
Introducing an Assault Weapons Ban Do you see what I see? Hasn't that been tried before and failed in the court systems? And you say that ALL democrats supported it? Using your own cite, most of the Dems did NOT support it and it went absolutely no where. Once more, you are lying out your ass.
NJ House to House Confiscation Here is a gem from you. Yes, in 2013, NJ passed a law that there would be no more mags with more than a 10 round capacity sold, traded, etc. in the state. Colorado passed the same law. Are you aware, it was grandfathered in? That means, if you have one with more than 10, you need to keep it in your home where it's legal. Taking it out of your home, it might be confiscated. But inside your home, it's legal. You can parade around your house wearing nothing more than a red ribbon on your private parts and no one will care as long as you keep your drapes closed. The orginating source was Brietbart who is pretty much at the bottom of the truth scale on anything, they just make shit up.
Please stop making shit up.
Not making anything up. The point is Democrats want to take away guns by using baby steps to do so. Like I said, magazine size, type of guns, and yes, medical conditions. It's the same thing DumBama did before he left office. He stopped sales to people on SS who were being cared for by somebody else in regards to paying bills. Trump rescinded the law because it's complete stupidity that some old people who can't write a check or not tech savvy enough to pay bills online be a danger to society.
So yes, NJ put a magazine law in place. Regardless if it's grandfathered or not, you cannot use the weapon. So what good is it since most people use their weapons outside of their home? How does one depend on a weapon they can't practice with? I seen nothing in the article about a Grandfather clause and that would need some explaining since they want to confiscate those weapons. If it's Grandfathered in, then there is no need to confiscate anything.
Shotgun rifle law. If it's illegal on a federal level, why is the city creating laws that are already on the federal books? Why did they say you can move the weapon to another location outside of the city provided you give them the address of the location of that weapon? If it's illegal, how does the city have records of it existing?
The assault weapons ban was not stopped in court. In fact the country had that ban for ten years. The Republican Congress decided not to renew it after it's expiration since it didn't show any positive results. But that doesn't mean with enough power, the Democrats won't put it back in place.
shut the **** up you moron
