What is your opinion of how Donald Trump is doing managing the Iran war

[my2¢]

As it has been with previous administrations, I believe our problem with national security stems from our presidents sticking their nose into the affairs of other countries.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

i did read your post. And I thought about the implications of your words and ideas and how you would implement them.

Your point is valid. People who are for war, are often far removed from the "conseqences of their actions".


The fix is obvious. Restrict voting and holding office to veterans.


Kind of makes sense. Lot of soft libs who have never really done anything, certainly never faced hard REALITY or personal danger.

REstrick voting and political power to people with some skin in the game.


Did you read STARSHIP TROOPERS? The book is better than the movie of course. It protrayed a society build along such ideas.

Let me guess, you are a veteran?

 

[Stann]

Errr, I'm responding to Janetthegreat and what SHE was saying....


I said that her concept was FASCIST.

In MY mind, calling something FASCIST carries a NEGATIVE connotation.

You read this and thought it was a sign of APPROVAL?


Wow. That's... deeply troubling.

Well you came off differently to me. Didn't you bring up the startroppers thing ?

 

[Stann]

Errr, I'm responding to Janetthegreat and what SHE was saying....


I said that her concept was FASCIST.

In MY mind, calling something FASCIST carries a NEGATIVE connotation.

You read this and thought it was a sign of APPROVAL?


Wow. That's... deeply troubling.

Double checked it was you. That would be fascist. No apology given.

 

[Stann]

Let me guess, you are a veteran?

If she is , she's one of the bad ones.

 

[Stann]

As it has been with previous administrations, I believe our problem with national security stems from our presidents sticking their nose into the affairs of other countries.

In part.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

If she is , she's one of the bad ones.

Sure seems like it.

 

[Correll]

It's easy to use one's words against them when they are lies.. plus I don't own work , don't rely on the propaganda from either side to present my case or make a truthful statement. That is almost impossible to do with propaganda.kind of the reverse of the truth. Just doesn't cut it.

Except, I wasn't lying, I was talking about what janetthegreat said and what it meant.

Her idea was fascist. As you said, but oddly attacked me for what she said.....

You are just a leftard. Being retarded.

 

[Correll]

Let me guess, you are a veteran?

LOL. You say you are going to guess, then you don't guess and ask me a question.

You've lost the meaning of words.

To move shit forward, NO, I AM NOT A VETERAN.


But, my opposition to your idea, is not based on how it would effect me personally.

 

[Stann]

Except, I wasn't lying, I was talking about what janetthegreat said and what it meant.

Her idea was fascist. As you said, but oddly attacked me for what she said.....

You are just a leftard. Being retarded.

Please reread your statement in that post and please try to be objective. I can only judge by what you say.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

LOL. You say you are going to guess, then you don't guess and ask me a question.

You've lost the meaning of words.

To move shit forward, NO, I AM NOT A VETERAN.


But, my opposition to your idea, is not based on how it would effect me personally.

I don't understand you or what you are saying at all. It seems incoherent.

 

[Correll]

Well you came off differently to me. Didn't you bring up the startroppers thing ?

Her comment is based on an idea, that people who have "skin in the game" have more moral authority than those that do not.

That is very much one of the old arguments AGAINST the concept of universial voting rights.


STARSHIP TROOPERS, is a good book that addresses that idea seriously.


Do you understand that I am talking about her comment and looking at the ideas underneath it?

And what it means, and asking if we really want to go that route and what it means if we operate that way?

 

[Correll]

Double checked it was you. That would be fascist. No apology given.

Wow. You are being willfully retarded.

 

[Stann]

Her comment is based on an idea, that people who have "skin in the game" have more moral authority than those that do not.

That is very much one of the old arguments AGAINST the concept of universial voting rights.


STARSHIP TROOPERS, is a good book that addresses that idea seriously.


Do you understand that I am talking about her comment and looking at the ideas underneath it?

And what it means, and asking if we really want to go that route and what it means if we operate that way?

That sounds better , less confusing than the original post. I agree with that , it would be fascist.

 

[Correll]

I don't understand you or what you are saying at all. It seems incoherent.

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

You said you would make a GUESS. Those words meant that you were going to make a statement, based on insufficent data, and see if your "guess" was correct.

Then, instead of doing that, you asked me a QUESTION.

ie a REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

I then pointed out how what you did was wrong.


That is very coherent.

Your leftism has progressed to the point that you cannot think or talk right.


In this, you are very representative of lefties across the board.


It is a very big problem for society.


The topic is your point that veterans have MORAL AUTHORITY, to make decisions on matters of war and peace.


I think that people who are not veterans have the right to participate in such decisions, even if they have no "skin in the game".


They have freedom of speech and their ideas should be heard and judged on their merits or lack there of, regardless of their lack of military service.

 

[Correll]

That sounds better , less confusing than the original post. I agree with that , it would be fascist.

Are you opposed to any and all restrictions on voting rights or just this one based on military service?

 

[JanetTheGreat]

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

You said you would make a GUESS. Those words meant that you were going to make a statement, based on insufficent data, and see if your "guess" was correct.

Then, instead of doing that, you asked me a QUESTION.

ie a REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

I then pointed out how what you did was wrong.


That is very coherent.

Your leftism has progressed to the point that you cannot think or talk right.


In this, you are very representative of lefties across the board.


It is a very big problem for society.


The topic is your point that veterans have MORAL AUTHORITY, to make decisions on matters of war and peace.


I think that people who are not veterans have the right to participate in such decisions, even if they have no "skin in the game".


They have freedom of speech and their ideas should be heard and judged on their merits or lack there of, regardless of their lack of military service.

Look, I'm just going to put you on the ignore list - as you have no desire to have an honest conversation. You completely misunderstand what I am trying to say despite repeated attempts to explain it to you, because whatever world view you have is so distorted you can't even talk coherently.

Again, there it is - "I don't like what you say, so you must be a leftie!".

Good day to you.

 

[Stann]

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

You said you would make a GUESS. Those words meant that you were going to make a statement, based on insufficent data, and see if your "guess" was correct.

Then, instead of doing that, you asked me a QUESTION.

ie a REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

I then pointed out how what you did was wrong.


That is very coherent.

Your leftism has progressed to the point that you cannot think or talk right.


In this, you are very representative of lefties across the board.


It is a very big problem for society.


The topic is your point that veterans have MORAL AUTHORITY, to make decisions on matters of war and peace.


I think that people who are not veterans have the right to participate in such decisions, even if they have no "skin in the game".


They have freedom of speech and their ideas should be heard and judged on their merits or lack there of, regardless of their lack of military service.

You are doing it again. Maybe you should go back to bed and start all over. You're coming off as deranged and overly emotional about nothing.

 

[Correll]

Look, I'm just going to put you on the ignore list - as you have no desire to have an honest conversation. You completely misunderstand what I am trying to say despite repeated attempts to explain it to you, because whatever world view you have is so distorted you can't even talk coherently.

Again, there it is - "I don't like what you say, so you must be a leftie!".

Good day to you.

Not the first leftard to put me on ignore, because I took their words seriously and addressed them seriously.


Such discussion is now completely alien to them.


Very pathetic.

 

[Stann]

Not the first leftard to put me on ignore, because I took their words seriously and addressed them seriously.


Such discussion is now completely alien to them.


Very pathetic.

You totally confused another person , one of your own. You.atr all of ver the place. Time to regroup.