MikeK
Gold Member
I would not have needed to wait because I could have walked into one of the clinics and been seen by a paramedic who, like the military medics, would have understood that I didn't need an MD's attention and would have given me the antibiotics, which is all I needed. Everything I experienced in the emergency room was redundant.How would that solve the problem? You would have still needed to wait because actual emergencies take priority, and the doctors would have still needed to perform the full standard of care.
And that isn't my "expert" opinion, it's an opinion based on experience and awareness of my own circumstances.
I apologize if I conveyed the wrong impression but my concern is with eliminating non-emergency complaints, such as my infected finger, not "removing poor people."Removing poor people doesn't mean doctors change how they practice medicine.
My point is I did not need the attention of an MD. And based on what I've heard from several medical professionals, neither do the majority of people who show up at emergency rooms with relatively minor problems which could be handled by paramedics -- just as they are in the military. The existing medical bureaucracy is a consequence of our excessively litigious culture, which is a problem that needs to be addressed.
If the indigent, as well as those who are compromised by the clock as in my case, have walk-in clinics to go to with their non-emergency problems, an enormous burden will be lifted from hospital emergency rooms.