We fought a war to get rid of a monarch and his nobles, do you really want to live through another?Where is your shining beacon of egalitarianism and equity?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We fought a war to get rid of a monarch and his nobles, do you really want to live through another?Where is your shining beacon of egalitarianism and equity?
You laugh because you're stuck for words, hence the deflections and not answering.You guys make me laugh
You villainize migrants who do those jobs and chase the homeless out of your cities
America Is a Country Club Hosting the Nepo OpenI've had a blast accumulating wealth and my kids will have a blast spending it.
My son will pay off his student loan and home mortgage.
My daughter will give most of hers away to her lazy, good-for-nothings friends
Oh well.
He probably paid more in taxes than Trump did (as a portion of his income). Even if he didn't pay income or SS tax, he still paid sales and gas taxes. A portion of his rent went to local real estate taxes.If the homeless guy mowed the lawn, pulled the weeds, and swept the driveway, what tax did he pay on the $50?
![]()
I don’t see the connection with a government bureaucrat to determine how much money they can take from my pocket to redistribute to others in the name of their view of what is equitable.We fought a war to get rid of a monarch and his nobles, do you really want to live through another?
Government bureaucrats do NOT determine anything, it is your elected representatives in Congress that take money from your pocket to redistribute to others in the name of their view of what equitable.I don’t see the connection with a government bureaucrat to determine how much money they can take from my pocket to redistribute to others in the name of their view of what equitable
The elected officials, I vote for try to reduce the tax burden.Government bureaucrats do NOT determine anything, it is your elected representatives in Congress that take money from your pocket to redistribute to others in the name of their view of what equitable.
I wish posters would take the topic seriously.He probably paid more in taxes than Trump did (as a portion of his income). Even if he didn't pay income or SS tax, he still paid sales and gas taxes. A portion of his rent went to local real estate taxes.
A good place to start would be accepting the facts of life.That's a lot more nuanced argument and position than most of what we get from the commie left.
If you want to have a discussion about changing the environment to make it easier for the working poor to survive or even thrive, without demonizing the rich or middle class, that could be a constructive discussion.
Most lefties aren't interested in anything like that.
True, but it starts the engine.An Ignition Key Is Not an Engine
From an HeirHead pharaoh? He just wanted to make the commoners feel sorry for those sitting pretty.“Better is bread with a happy heart, than wealth with vexation”
― Amenemope, Ancient Egyptian Pharaoh
Taxes are low in America. Not so much in socialistic countries.The elected officials, I vote for try to reduce the tax burden.
Equality is a human construct and counter to nature which only recognizes equilibrium.Speaking of personal wealth as measured in economic Net Worth, there is absolutely no question that "inequality" is increasing beyond any precedent in a free country. The people at the bottom, so to speak, have less than nothing; their Net Worth is below zero, while the wealthiest of us - mainly entrepreneurs and investors - accumulate more and more wealth.
It is axiomatic on the Left that "inequality" is bad. They obviously feel that increasing "inequality" is self-evidently evil, and must be fought. They base whole political campaigns on promises to fight inequality.
What's wrong with inequality? Imagine an entrepreneur who invents a new gadget that millions of people quickly decide that they are willing to pay substantial amounts of money to have, and that entrepreneur is able to accumulate a King's Ransom on the profits from those gadgets.
So what? Why is that a bad thing? Is anyone else made poorer or more wretched by the entrepreneur's accumulation of wealth? Assume he pays millions and millions in all manner of taxes, complying with every relevant tax law.
Taxing away inherited wealth would eliminate the need for any income taxes, including those on the earned income of the plutocracy.We live in a society that requires the interaction between people. Super-wealth serves no purpose in a society. Protecting the accumulation of super-wealth is counter to the country's best interests. Taxes should be really high as you make super-wealth levels of income.
False alternativeYes, because a bloated bureaucratic government sucking up money is better somehow, because, reasons....
That's pretty radical but I get the sentiment. Keep what you earn but your kids dont get much of it. Certainly keeps the rewards to the earner and minimizes nepotism through family wealth. Trump would be broke.Taxing away inherited wealth would eliminate the need for any income taxes, including those on the earned income of the plutocracy.
Arbitrary Profit Is Also a Tax on the Employees and ConsumersPeople who don't work don't pay taxes. Many low wage earners collect more in tax-funded benefits than they pay in taxes.
In most states retail food is not subject to sales tax.Sure. You can starve with dignity intact, no doubt.
Familyism Is Even More Primitive Than TribalismHowever, what is good for my family may not be good for our society.