What is the real reason LE allows these riots to occur?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
51,922
51,771
3,615
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?



 
To protect and serve, the politicians they work for, following their orders regardless of what happens to the people who pay the bills.
 
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?




Is the Mayor wearing a Kevlar Military Helmet? Seems "somewhat peaceful" if you have to wear one of those..
 
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?





You have to remember the mayors of those cities told their police forces to stand down. They stood around and watched looter loot and arsonists burn building to the ground. All on their mayors orders.
 
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?




I guess when you put people who look like crack-whores in charge of cities....this is what you get.
Just look at Portland and Chicago.
 
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?




I guess when you put people who look like crack-whores in charge of cities....this is what you get.
Just look at Portland and Chicago.

1618317884350.png


1618317914017.png
 
Didnt LE used to try to stop riots? People are destroying provate property. They are committing crimes. Local residents pay taxes to have LE protect and serve the community.

What is the true motivation of allowing these riots to continue?






They have to protect themselves.

If police officers use violent methods against African Americans, they could end up in the dock like Eric Chauvin. Even if found innocent, it means they willed be ruined financially. Multiple millions are being spent of Chauvin's defense
 
Rioters should be arrested. No excuse for rioting.

And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

Thomas Jefferson
 
Rioters should be arrested. No excuse for rioting.

And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

Thomas Jefferson
Feel free to drain all of your blood on the tree. What's stopping you?
 
For big riots, it's clear (just watch the looting on TV) --- they don't stop it because they CAN'T stop it. Physically cannot. Too many armed people.

Another reason: several famous times in history police or equivalents have tried to stop large marches/riots (by shooting as a rule) ---- St. Petersburg in 1905, leading immediately to the Duma and to the Russian Revolution in 1917; the Champs de Mars in 1790, IIRC, leading directly to The Terror with the guillotines; Paris 1936, a pitched battle to enter and try to burn down several government buildings. In every case, revolution or the fall of the government occurred immediately afterward. In the case of Paris 1936, the government seemed to have won that night but the government fell again, never did recover, and in May 1940 the Germans swept through France to the sea and complete conquest within ten days. France fractured along the lines of the riots, and part of it was occupied by Germans for the duration of the world war and part by the pro-Nazi Vichy government. So that's another reason police don't try to stop rioting: if the rioters lose, they tend to rebel against government on a bigger scale ------------ and win. Stopping riots is fatal to politicians, often literally fatal; also to the current form of government.
 
Rioters should be arrested. No excuse for rioting.

And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

Thomas Jefferson
Feel free to drain all of your blood on the tree. What's stopping you?

It's not about me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top