You do understand that Iran gave up it's nuclear program and elected a more moderate President as a result of sanctions, right?
How much did that cost?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What is Obama's problem?
- Thread starter Quantum Windbag
- Start date
You do understand that Iran gave up it's nuclear program and elected a more moderate President as a result of sanctions, right?
How much did that cost?
His problem, the usual when a idealogical hypothesis meets reality, looked good on paper, not so much in the real world.
Peach
Gold Member
- Jan 10, 2009
- 20,864
- 2,729
- 245
His problem, the usual when a idealogical hypothesis meets reality, looked good on paper, not so much in the real world.
Too accomodating with the extreme right.
- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,412
- 24,049
- 2,290
Obama's problem is that he is the Presidential Equivalent of Elliot Rodger.
He thinks voters should be thrilled to be fucked by his policies without him ever actually doing anything postive.
What fucked up policies?
You think he should have invaded Iran and Ukraine?
Do tell.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
Peach
Gold Member
- Jan 10, 2009
- 20,864
- 2,729
- 245
Obama's problem is that he is the Presidential Equivalent of Elliot Rodger.
He thinks voters should be thrilled to be fucked by his policies without him ever actually doing anything postive.
What fucked up policies?
You think he should have invaded Iran and Ukraine?
Do tell.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
Yes, allowed a massive attack on US cities, ignored facts, blamed bad intelligence for a personal war that cost over a trillion so far, and thousands of US lives, over a hundred thousands of lives in the country we were to "liberate", and refused to budget an ongoing 20 year project that cost us another city.
Face it, Obama looks great next to Baby Bush, and he isn't great. Obama can cave in to demands he should not, and has a tough time winning over those he should be able to work with. That is a problem.
The ignorance, hate, and stupidity exhibited by most on the partisan right.What is Obama's problem?
Obama's problem is that he is the Presidential Equivalent of Elliot Rodger.
He thinks voters should be thrilled to be fucked by his policies without him ever actually doing anything postive.
What fucked up policies?
You think he should have invaded Iran and Ukraine?
Do tell.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
NO ONW on the right was screaming INVASION...just he should have handled it better. Strawman? I agree.
He is too modest.
Even the reporters couldn't keep a straight face for that one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyz_doLLoXk
The best part is when asked for specifics....
she has none!
Sad really. He does not get enough credit for ENGAGEMENT???? IOW, for nothing but talks. Rich.
You do understand that Iran gave up it's nuclear program and elected a more moderate President as a result of sanctions, right?
How much did that cost?
No they haven't. they have not 'given up their nuclear program.' Not yet. When they actually do, then Obama can get some credit for that. Currently they are just in an interim agreement. The nukes are on hold until something more permanent is established. That permanent agreement may or may not actually materialize.
- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,412
- 24,049
- 2,290
What fucked up policies?
You think he should have invaded Iran and Ukraine?
Do tell.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
Yes, allowed a massive attack on US cities, ignored facts, blamed bad intelligence for a personal war that cost over a trillion so far, and thousands of US lives, over a hundred thousands of lives in the country we were to "liberate", and refused to budget an ongoing 20 year project that cost us another city.
Face it, Obama looks great next to Baby Bush, and he isn't great. Obama can cave in to demands he should not, and has a tough time winning over those he should be able to work with. That is a problem.
^^^ Non Sequitur Alert ^^^
The best part is when asked for specifics....
she has none!
Sad really. He does not get enough credit for ENGAGEMENT???? IOW, for nothing but talks. Rich.
You do understand that Iran gave up it's nuclear program and elected a more moderate President as a result of sanctions, right?
How much did that cost?
No they haven't. they have not 'given up their nuclear program.' Not yet. When they actually do, then Obama can get some credit for that. Currently they are just in an interim agreement. The nukes are on hold until something more permanent is established. That permanent agreement may or may not actually materialize.
Word has it they've destroyed a good portion of their material...or SO we are led to believe. I don't trust those rat bastards OR the ones overseeing it either.
His problem, the usual when a idealogical hypothesis meets reality, looked good on paper, not so much in the real world.
Too accomodating with the extreme right.
ROFLMAO
Like MOST of your fucking posts, right Clayton buddy?The ignorance, hate, and stupidity exhibited by most on the partisan right.What is Obama's problem?
Get lost.
JACKASS.
What fucked up policies?
You think he should have invaded Iran and Ukraine?
Do tell.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
Yes, allowed a massive attack on US cities, ignored facts, blamed bad intelligence for a personal war that cost over a trillion so far, and thousands of US lives, over a hundred thousands of lives in the country we were to "liberate", and refused to budget an ongoing 20 year project that cost us another city.
Face it, Obama looks great next to Baby Bush, and he isn't great. Obama can cave in to demands he should not, and has a tough time winning over those he should be able to work with. That is a problem.
He doesn't feel he should have to work with anyone, he has his pen and a phone, that's enough. He has been nothing but an ineffective place holder and if the left weren't the one to write the history books, it would be reported that way. He will leave office with approval ratings of 25-35%.
It's far quicker to list the effective Obama policies than to list the near infinite bad ones:
1. ...
And I reject your phoney b'loney strawman that opposition to Obama's ineffective diplomacy and sanctions means INVASIONS.
Yes, allowed a massive attack on US cities, ignored facts, blamed bad intelligence for a personal war that cost over a trillion so far, and thousands of US lives, over a hundred thousands of lives in the country we were to "liberate", and refused to budget an ongoing 20 year project that cost us another city.
Face it, Obama looks great next to Baby Bush, and he isn't great. Obama can cave in to demands he should not, and has a tough time winning over those he should be able to work with. That is a problem.
He doesn't feel he should have to work with anyone, he has his pen and a phone, that's enough. He has been nothing but an ineffective place holder and if the left weren't the one to write the history books, it would be reported that way. He will leave office with approval ratings of 25-35%.
..."If congress won't act...I will..."
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
- Thread starter
- #35
He is too modest.
Even the reporters couldn't keep a straight face for that one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyz_doLLoXk
The best part is when asked for specifics....
she has none!
Sad really. He does not get enough credit for ENGAGEMENT???? IOW, for nothing but talks. Rich.
You do understand that Iran gave up it's nuclear program and elected a more moderate President as a result of sanctions, right?
How much did that cost?
You do understand that they really didn't, don't you?
awwwwww lookie lookie... more obama deranged idiocy.
cool.
cool.
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
- Thread starter
- #37
The ignorance, hate, and stupidity exhibited by most on the partisan right.What is Obama's problem?
As usual, all Clayton has is idiocy.
He is too modest.
Even the reporters couldn't keep a straight face for that one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyz_doLLoXk
Its to late in the day for me to answer that question.
R
rdean
Guest
What is Obama's problem?
Obama's problem is America's problem. The GOP.
Obama's problem is America's problem. The GOP.
Obama's idea of "engagement":
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 128
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 122
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 74
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 312
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 64
- Replies
- 259
- Views
- 2K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8158
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-