What is it Exactly that so Infuriates the Left about Trump?

[candycorn]

And Kirk died for it. Trump would have too but the lefty idiot missed the mark.

Again, it was a registered republican who shot the blob.

 

[Meathead]

Again, it was a registered republican who shot the blob.

One of yours. Another asshole.

 

[forkup]

Sorkin said it right in HCON-172 on the West Wing.

"No one in government takes responsibility for
anything anymore. We foster, we obfuscate, we rationalize. "Everybody does it." That's what
we say. So we come to occupy a moral safe house where everyone's to blame so no one's
guilty."

That's exactly right and way more poetic. I loved that show. Didn't age well though, considering this political climate.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I read USMB comments so I don't have to watch FOX.

 

[Hafar1014]

Again, it was a registered republican who shot the blob.

A gay man with a cross dressing gay partner

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dude you are supporting a convicted felon

No kidding!
What could be worse than bookkeeping misdemeanors that were beyond the statute of limitations?
And seriously, shouldn't a jaywalker get a ticket for each step they take to illegally cross the street?

 

[1srelluc]

Trump runs roughshod over them. They are not used to hoofmarks on their backsides.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Trump runs roughshod over them. They are not used to hoofmarks on their backsides.

In other words, Trump won, and continues to win against the neo-leftists. In my 60 years I have never seen one of the two parties lose so badly and consistently as the democraps are losing today. If they weren't so overwhelmingly obsessed and consumed with hating Trump, they might realize how much they really suck as a party and be embarrassed. Well, I guess the waning popularity of the democrap party means some have realized how pathetic the democrap party really is.

 

[forkup]

No kidding!
What could be worse than bookkeeping misdemeanors that were beyond the statute of limitations?
And seriously, shouldn't a jaywalker get a ticket for each step they take to illegally cross the street?

Bookkeeping misdemeanor? Last time I checked a felony is not a misdemeanor, since it's you know... a felony. Oh and by the way. I'm betting that bookkeepers have stolen more money than all bank robbers in history. And by orders of magnitude.

But I forget when Trump does anything it's not really true, or when it's true not really important, or when it's true and important, still alright, because someone, somewhere did something that's sort off, kind off, maybe, if you squint real hard, similar.

Trump and his company were charged and found guilty with serious crimes, felonies to be exact, not ones but twice. And indicted dozens of times with others. Only reason he didn't stand trial for those, was because you and people like you didn't think being a criminal was reason enough to not elect him.

Don't hear you complain about that particular technicality.

As for it being beyond the statute of limitations, also of course a technicality. Guess what... it wasn't. The reason I know that is, because the judge didn't dismiss it on those grounds.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Bookkeeping misdemeanor? Last time I checked a felony is not a misdemeanor, since it's you know... a felony. Oh and by the way. I'm betting that bookkeepers have stolen more money than all bank robbers in history. And by a big some orders of magnitude.

But I forget when Trump does anything it's not really true, or when it's true not really important, or when it's true and important, still alright, because someone, somewhere did something that's sort off, kind off, maybe, if you squint real hard, similar.

Trump and his company were charged and found guilty with serious crimes, felonies to be exact, not ones but twice. And indicted dozens of times with others. Only reason he didn't stand trial for those, was because you and people like you didn't think being a criminal was reason enough to not elect him.

Don't hear you complain about that particular technicality.

As for it being beyond the statute of limitations, also of course a technicality. Guess what... it wasn't. The reason I know that because the judge didn't dismiss it on those grounds.

Bookkeeping misdemeanor?

Yes. And beyond the statute of limitations.

I'm betting that bookkeepers have stolen more money than all bank robbers in history.

Nothing about those misdemeanors involved stolen money.

 

[forkup]

Bookkeeping misdemeanor?

Yes. And beyond the statute of limitations.

I'm betting that bookkeepers have stolen more money than all bank robbers in history.

Nothing about those misdemeanors involved stolen money.

Sure it does. If you file something as a business expense you can recoup some of that money. That money is taxpayers money. Is stealing NY taxpayers money a serious crimes you think.

When banks determine the interest rates when granting a loan they consider the perceived risk. So the value of the collateral is important. If a real estate developer lies about that he's literally stealing money from the banks. Millions of dollars if the loans are big enough. Wich they were in this case. As I said, bookkeepers make your run of the mill bank robber feel like a child.

Do you think stealing millions from a bank is a serious crime?

 

[Redfish]

He beat the old white lady out of her turn.

correction: the old white criminal

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Sure it does. If you file something as a business expense you can recoup some of that money. That money is taxpayers money. Is stealing MY taxpayers money money a serious crimes you think.

When banks determine the interest rates when granting a loan they consider the perceived risk. So the value of the collateral is important. If a real estate developer lies about that he's literally stealing money from the banks.

Do you think stealing from a bank is a serious crimes?

If you file something as a business expense you can recoup some of that money. That money is taxpayers money. Is stealing MY taxpayers money money a serious crimes you think.

You're exposing your ignorance, again.
NDAs are tax deductible. Legal fees are tax deductible.

So the value of the collateral is important. If a real estate developer lies about that he's literally stealing money from the banks.

If you don't think banks have their own people to estimate the value of loan collateral, you're dumber than you first appeared.

 

[forkup]

If you file something as a business expense you can recoup some of that money. That money is taxpayers money. Is stealing MY taxpayers money money a serious crimes you think.

You're exposing your ignorance, again.
NDAs are tax deductible. Legal fees are tax deductible.

So the value of the collateral is important. If a real estate developer lies about that he's literally stealing money from the banks.

If you don't think banks have their own people to estimate the value of loan collateral, you're dumber than you first appeared.

Ah so I see. It's the banks own fault they got robbed. And yes they make the business pay for an independent assessor. But they still rely on what the business tell them. So when they for instance forge the signature of that assessor well they get hosed. When the books they go over are fraudulent, well the bank gets hosed.

That's why Trump and his company was convicted.

So I'll say it again. SERIOUS CRIMES.

 

[forkup]

If you file something as a business expense you can recoup some of that money. That money is taxpayers money. Is stealing MY taxpayers money money a serious crimes you think.

You're exposing your ignorance, again.
NDAs are tax deductible. Legal fees are tax deductible.

So the value of the collateral is important. If a real estate developer lies about that he's literally stealing money from the banks.

If you don't think banks have their own people to estimate the value of loan collateral, you're dumber than you first appeared.

And yes legal fees are, personal expenses, like... I don't know.. paying of pornstars... isn't.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Ah so I see. It's the banks own fault they got robbed. And yes they do. But they still rely on what the business tell them. So when they for instance forge the signature of an assessor well they get hosed.

That's why Trump and his company was convicted.

So I'll say it again. SERIOUS CRIMES.

How are those convictions holding up in the appeals process? How is all the great work by Jack Smith doing? The fine work of Letitia James? That of Fani Willis? Seems like they did well in the lower courts with partisan judges, but when pressed were found to be frivolous and politically motivated. It was all lawfare and you know it. But hey, the people saw it was lawfare and it scared the people into voting for Trump.

 

[Marener]

Trump talks like a child. I don’t respect his intellect and I don’t respect how he treats the intellect of the nation.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ah so I see. It's the banks own fault they got robbed. And yes they make the business pay for an independent assessor. But they still rely on what the business tell them. So when they for instance forge the signature of that assessor well they get hosed. When the books they go over are fraudulent, well the bank gets hosed.

That's why Trump and his company was convicted.

So I'll say it again. SERIOUS CRIMES.

The banks didn't get robbed, clearly.

 

[rightwinger]

How are those convictions holding up in the appeals process? How is all the great work by Jack Smith doing? The fine work of Letitia James? That of Fani Willis? Seems like they did well in the lower courts with partisan judges, but when pressed were found to be frivolous and politically motivated. It was all lawfare and you know it. But hey, the people saw it was lawfare and it scared the people into voting for Trump.

All cases were dropped because Trump is president not because he is innocent

 

[forkup]

How are those convictions holding up in the appeals process? How is all the great work by Jack Smith doing? The fine work of Letitia James? That of Fani Willis? Seems like they did well in the lower courts with partisan judges, but when pressed were found to be frivolous and politically motivated. It was all lawfare and you know it. But hey, the people saw it was lawfare and it scared the people into voting for Trump.

As far as I know the convictions hold. And no they aren't frivolous. What they are are on hold because the FELON is President thanks to people like you. Just because you don't mind banks being robbed of millions of dollars doesn't mean the act is frivolous.

As for political motivated. Guess what.. 2 juries unanimously decided that Trump was guilty. And one more decided by the preponderance of evidence that he sexually assaulted a person. That's how guilt and innocence is decided in the US not by political affiliation.