What Is Defined As A Weapon Of War?

[Road Runner]

I'm just asking because an AR-15 definitely doesn't qualify. I just checked.

 

[1srelluc]

To the leftists? A butterknife if a right-leaner owns one.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

The leftists must think that pencils are weapons of war.

 

[Road Runner]

The leftists must think that pencils are weapons of war.

Literally anything can be a weapon of war if you use it violently against another person on the offense.

 

[JGalt]

I'm just asking because an AR-15 definitely doesn't qualify. I just checked.

Not unless you're going to war with unruly gophers and groundhogs. Otherwise, I'd rather have an M4 carbine.

 

[Road Runner]

Thank you to whoever moved my thread since I accidentally put it in the wrong forum.

 

[Winston]

I'm just asking because an AR-15 definitely doesn't qualify. I just checked.

God damn but this placed is filled with stupid today. Did you listen to what she said? Do you know what project AGILE was, from 1962? No, of course not, because you are a flippin idiot.

The Simple Physics That Makes Some Bullets Deadlier Than Others

How higher speed, greater mass, and more surface area increase the damage that rounds can do to human bodies.

www.thetrace.org

 

[Road Runner]

God damn but this placed is filled with stupid today. Did you listen to what she said? Do you know what project AGILE was, from 1962? No, of course not, because you are a flippin idiot.

The Simple Physics That Makes Some Bullets Deadlier Than Others

How higher speed, greater mass, and more surface area increase the damage that rounds can do to human bodies.

www.thetrace.org

Maybe it's because I was born nearly thirty years later.

 

[Winston]

Maybe it's because I was born nearly thirty years later.

So damn what. You entered this thread talking about the AR-15 not being a weapon of war and there it is, 1962. Project Agile, IT WAS FLIPPIN CREATED AS A WEAPON OF WAR. The damn military was singing its praises, how effective it was, how much damage it delivered. Now, more than fifty years later some snot nosed little pencil dick wants to pretend the AR-15 is not a weapon of war. Lame.

 

[Road Runner]

So damn what. You entered this thread talking about the AR-15 not being a weapon of war and there it is, 1962. Project Agile, IT WAS FLIPPIN CREATED AS A WEAPON OF WAR. The damn military was singing its praises, how effective it was, how much damage it delivered. Now, more than fifty years later some snot nosed little pencil dick wants to pretend the AR-15 is not a weapon of war. Lame.

Maybe there was a time when it was but it's not listed now. That's the point.

 

[irosie91]

I'm just asking because an AR-15 definitely doesn't qualify. I just checked.

It is a weapon of KILLING-----recommended by those who advocate the
MURDER OF BAMBI. It ain't no 22 or buck shot air gun

 

[Road Runner]

It is a weapon of KILLING-----recommended by those who advocate the
MURDER OF BAMBI.

Or by a means of self-defense.

 

[irosie91]

Or by a means of self-defense.

Against Bambi?

 

[Road Runner]

Against Bambi?

I guess if needed lol

 

[BackAgain]

I maintain that rocks are still weapons of war.

That little factoid might be significant.

 

[irosie91]

I maintain that rocks are still weapons of war.

That little factoid might be significant.

People are a weapon of war-----anyone TALKED INTO THE
IDEA THAT "MARTYDOM" on the field of war is a GOOD THING---
is a DANGEROUS WEAPON OF WAR

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm just asking because an AR-15 definitely doesn't qualify. I just checked.

Democrats are the worlds biggest weapon of war today

 

[Bell Huey]

So damn what. You entered this thread talking about the AR-15 not being a weapon of war and there it is, 1962. Project Agile, IT WAS FLIPPIN CREATED AS A WEAPON OF WAR. The damn military was singing its praises, how effective it was, how much damage it delivered. Now, more than fifty years later some snot nosed little pencil dick wants to pretend the AR-15 is not a weapon of war. Lame.

Not the semi automatic Sporter. The AR 15 YOU are talking about Became the M 16.

Here is the definition you need:

The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire rifles such as the FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

The semi atuomatic rifle does not qualify as a weapon of war. Try again.

 

[Bell Huey]

So damn what. You entered this thread talking about the AR-15 not being a weapon of war and there it is, 1962. Project Agile, IT WAS FLIPPIN CREATED AS A WEAPON OF WAR. The damn military was singing its praises, how effective it was, how much damage it delivered. Now, more than fifty years later some snot nosed little pencil dick wants to pretend the AR-15 is not a weapon of war. Lame.

It fires an intermediate round. Not high powered. There have been complaints about the military round for decades. It is semi automatic.

The round is so useless the military is changing assault rifles and rounds:

XM7 rifle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[irosie91]

It fires an intermediate round. Not high powered. There have been complaints about the military round for decades. It is semi automatic.

The round is so useless the military is changing assault rifles and rounds:

XM7 rifle - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

calm down folks----it is a problem because it is a weapon that can KILL
KIDS IN A SCHOOL ROOM