What is better?

[Votto]

Is it better for the government to give money to those in need or jobs or neither?

 

[blackhawk]

It would be better if the government used the money to run programs to help people in need get the training and skills needed to get a good job.

 

[Votto]

It would be better if the government used the money to run programs to help people in need get the training and skills needed to get a good job.

Since our public schools don't do that I can see your point.

 

[blackhawk]

It would be better if the government used the money to run programs to help people in need get the training and skills needed to get a good job.

Since our public schools don't do that I can see your point.

I really wish that wasn't true but sadly it is.

 

[norwegen]

Neither, unless a government job, which should be few and far between.

 

[Votto]

Neither, unless a government job, which should be few and far between.

It begs the question, why not just have folks work for their free hand outs?

Is work equated with slavery to "the man", or is it good to work?

 

[Indeependent]

Neither, unless a government job, which should be few and far between.

It begs the question, why not just have folks work for their free hand outs?

Is work equated with slavery to "the man", or is it good to work?

It is good to work.

 

[HenryBHough]

I could get behind a program under which government would buy houses from unemployed who have been promised a job at a new location to which they would have to move. Mind ye, not to buy them a new house, just buy the former one and either resell it or just tear it down.

 

[Votto]

Neither, unless a government job, which should be few and far between.

It begs the question, why not just have folks work for their free hand outs?

Is work equated with slavery to "the man", or is it good to work?

It is good to work.

Is it the job of government to see to it that we work?