What is bad about socialism?

Midnight FM

Gold Member
Joined
May 4, 2025
Messages
797
Reaction score
349
Points
143
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
What is wrong with socialism? Only idiots, such as yourself, promote it. Then when you actually experience socialism you quickly change your mind.
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
I don’t know you ******* retard. Maybe it’s the death, poverty and starvation?
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
This ****** acts like this is a new idea and we don’t have a hundred years of history to show why it’s bad.
 
I don’t know you ******* retard. Maybe it’s the death, poverty and starvation?
You haven't substantiated that any of those things are the result of "socialism". Maybe some regimes which were considered "socialist" engaged in those things. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
socialism is communism with training wheels ..
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.
Socialism is ok as long as everyone is satisfied with being equally poor
 
You haven't substantiated that any of those things are the result of "socialism". Maybe some regimes which were considered "socialist" engaged in those things. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
In that case you’re a ******* retard. Too ******* stupid to research the history of socialist countries and the devastation of every single one of them.
 
Since the term "socialism" gets thrown around a lot by people who don't know the meaning of it, here's a definition:

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Now we can discuss what is bad about it.


Its just a dumb idea. Governements like that play with someone elses money and have no fear of failure... because they can always take more money from the people.
In private enterprise, you better damn well succeed or you wont be in business any more... this promotes exellence and inovation. Social governments are happy to just chug along at a sub par level at best. Dont point to the Scandinavians. They are not really socialist and they were also homogenous societies with a high level of accountability. Their rececipe for whatever success they had no longer exists in the world.
 
Oh please. Our Constitution allows that, and we aren't even "socialist". And it's not considered "theft" under the law, presently or historically, no matter how much the uninformed say it is.
It requires marxist wealth redistribution. You can rename it whatever you want, it's still taking from a productive person to subsidize a slug like yourself.
 
It's fine if one wants the government controlling most aspects of their life and if one does want that are nations that have that form of government so happy trails and enjoy your nirvana.
 
It requires marxist wealth redistribution.
Oh please. All governments, including America's involve wealth redistribution. That isn't "Marxism". "Marxism" doesn't just mean whatever you want it to.

You can rename it whatever you want, it's still taking from a productive person to subsidize a slug like yourself.
Good. I can put it to better use.

I'm amazed that anyone pretends to believe that a lottery winner is a "productive person".
 
Last edited:
15th post
It removes initiative
Oh give me a break.

and turns everything into a welfare state.
Who asks these stupid questions?
All states are funded through taxation, and the US Constitution has a provision for the general welfare of the population. "Welfare state" is just another word which means whatever you want it to. It's just a "dirty word".
 
Assuming it's an honest question, once you allow government to control all aspects of your life,.well, they will, as they profit and keep you in your underclass. A.caste system if you will.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom