What Is An "Imminent" Threat?

Iranians are not stupid.

Then maybe their towels are just too tight, choking off their brains too much under that hot Sun.

They cannot win this war, and they have not only already lost it, destroyed their country, but very soon, it is going to get a whole lot worse.

Iran will never have a nuke. And now, they don't even have an air force or navy, all their leaders are dead, they are running out of gasoline, food, money, bombs, and their own population is rising up against them.
 
The Mullahs are insane and believe they can make their 13th Iman arrive with enough destruction and cause the return of Allah.
Who told you this? Wahhabists? They are lying, as usual.
And, of course, few nukes can't cause "enough destruction" whatever you mean.
 
You are an idiot, I bet you dont believe that Muslims believe they have to rule the entire planet either. Even though it says that in the Koran.
Most of religions belive that they should rule the world. Including American Evangelists and Russian Orthodox Christianity.
 
Most of religions belive that they should rule the world. Including American Evangelists and Russian Orthodox Christianity.
show in the bible where Christians are commanded by God to subjugate and politically rule the world. there are 2 beliefs in the Muslim world about the command to rule the world. the peaceful ones believe that by immigrating and assimilation they can complete the commandment. The others believe that force is necessary and they are actively murdering and forcefully trying to take over countries.
 
imminent threat means a danger is immediate.
People have been screaming about Iran for DECADES. That is not imminent. Its the boy who cried wolf.
Since 1979, Iran has been associated with numerous attacks against Americans, including the 1979 U.S. Embassy hostage crisis, the 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut, and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, among others. The Iranian regime and its proxies have committed a range of assaults, indicating a sustained campaign of violence against U.S. forces and citizens.
ajc.org fdd.org

Overview of Iranian-Associated Attacks on Americans Since 1979​

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has been linked to numerous attacks against Americans. Below is a summary of significant incidents:

Key Attacks​

YearIncident DescriptionCasualties
1979U.S. Embassy hostage crisis in Tehran52 Americans taken hostage
1983U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut63 killed, including 17 Americans
1983Marine barracks bombing in Beirut241 U.S. service personnel killed
1996Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia19 American airmen killed

Additional Context​

  • The Iranian regime has supported various militant groups, such as Hezbollah, which have carried out attacks against U.S. interests.
  • The sustained campaign of violence includes not only direct attacks but also support for proxy groups targeting U.S. forces and civilians.
These incidents illustrate a long history of hostility and violence directed at Americans by Iran and its affiliates since 1979.
ajc.org fdd.org
 
Iranians are religious fanatics. They believe Allah is on their side, even if nukes are used.
As if Americans and Russians are not religious fanatics and don't think that God is on their sides. Russians with their conception of "Third Rome", "nuclear orthodoxy" and "we should prevent rebuild of The Third Temple by any means, even if 99% population of Earth will be killed in the " and American Evangelists/Zionists with their "We should rebuild The Third Temple and allow Crist/Anti-christ to rule the world".

And, at least on the level of doctrine, Iranians were against mass-murders, and, therefore, against WMD. Now, I think, they are going to change their position.
 
And, of course, with eleven uranium nukes Iran will still have much lesser chances to conquer Bahrain than North Korea have chances to capture Southern Korea with few hundred nukes.
Nuke is not a magic wand. It's just a weapon.
 
You are an idiot, I bet you dont believe that Muslims believe they have to rule the entire planet either. Even though it says that in the Koran.

Same as the Cult Jews and the same as promised eventually by the Cult Christians .

Which allows Deep State to sow violence and hate between the Abrahamic Cults .

And like a good Muncher you just see it as the war that suits you best -- Cult Islam versus Cult Christianity .
Another Patsy .
 
Same as the Cult Jews and the same as promised eventually by the Cult Christians .

Which allows Deep State to sow violence and hate between the Abrahamic Cults .

And like a good Muncher you just see it as the war that suits you best -- Cult Islam versus Cult Christianity .
Another Patsy .
The Marxist Cult is teh worst
 
Since 1979, Iran has been associated with numerous attacks against Americans, including the 1979 U.S. Embassy hostage crisis, the 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut, and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, among others. The Iranian regime and its proxies have committed a range of assaults, indicating a sustained campaign of violence against U.S. forces and citizens.
ajc.org fdd.org

Overview of Iranian-Associated Attacks on Americans Since 1979​

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has been linked to numerous attacks against Americans. Below is a summary of significant incidents:

Key Attacks​

YearIncident DescriptionCasualties
1979U.S. Embassy hostage crisis in Tehran52 Americans taken hostage
1983U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut63 killed, including 17 Americans
1983Marine barracks bombing in Beirut241 U.S. service personnel killed
1996Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia19 American airmen killed

Additional Context​

  • The Iranian regime has supported various militant groups, such as Hezbollah, which have carried out attacks against U.S. interests.
  • The sustained campaign of violence includes not only direct attacks but also support for proxy groups targeting U.S. forces and civilians.
These incidents illustrate a long history of hostility and violence directed at Americans by Iran and its affiliates since 1979.
ajc.org fdd.org
We started it. We have been doing the same stuff to them. Should they have started to bomb us because we were an imminent threat to them?
 
Should all the countries trump has threatened, gang up and invade us?
After all, threats are now an imminent threat...
 
We started it. We have been doing the same stuff to them. Should they have started to bomb us because we were an imminent threat to them?
Yes. And they will bomb you. May be even with nukes.
 
Yes. And they will bomb you. May be even with nukes.
Good thing you guys are safe.
Yall love supporting tyrannical regimes. In fact, thats about your only friends on the planet.
 
15th post
You are an idiot, I bet you dont believe that Muslims believe they have to rule the entire planet either. Even though it says that in the Koran.

IMG_3851.webp
 
Many of our lefty friends keep on saying that the Iran war is wrong because Iran wasn't an "imminent" threat. Several of them have said that they would be perfectly fine if Iran enriched Uranium to weapons grade, had nuclear bombs, and even possessed ballistic missiles which could reach all of the way here to the US. So, I ask them, "What exactly is an imminent threat? What would Iran have to do for it to be considered an imminent threat? Would we have to wait until Iran attacked or nuked us first?
An imminent threat is what you get when you don't deal effectively with growing threats.
 
imminent threat means a danger is immediate.
People have been screaming about Iran for DECADES. That is not imminent. Its the boy who cried wolf.
What difference does it make if a nuke goes off in Wash DC 6 months from now.
 
Good thing you guys are safe.
Of course we are not safe until NATO rolled back to, at least, Elbe river. And, of course, hypothetical Iranian nukes are less dangerous for us, than actual American, French and British.

Yall love supporting tyrannical regimes. In fact, thats about your only friends on the planet.
Hey, we are proxy fighting against the largest military alliance on this planet, who outnumber us as, at least, 7:1 numerically, and even more in industrial and financial capabilities. We can take any help, whoever suggests it. And, of course, Iranian Mullahs are much more rational and reasonable guys than US Evangelists, European Nazies and Israeli Zionists.
 
Back
Top Bottom