Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the Supreme Court was able to find a privacy clause in the Constitution, it can probably find a secession clause there, too. Liberals argue that it is a living document that will give birth to any clauses they happen to need.Right next to the privacy clause.You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.I never tire of correcting these bootlicking fascist toadies.
Please ! Fort Sumter was my 4th grade project , we all know who started the war .
They had no right or cause to secede. They were traitors who should have been hung in the town square . But Abe wanted the country to heal .
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
Lol. Funny how "strict constitutionalists " aren't so strict when they don't want to be .
If the Supreme Court was able to find a privacy clause in the Constitution, it can probably find a secession clause there, too. Liberals argue that it is a living document that will give birth to any clauses they happen to need.Right next to the privacy clause.You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.Please ! Fort Sumter was my 4th grade project , we all know who started the war .
They had no right or cause to secede. They were traitors who should have been hung in the town square . But Abe wanted the country to heal .
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
Lol. Funny how "strict constitutionalists " aren't so strict when they don't want to be .
You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.I never tire of correcting these bootlicking fascist toadies.
Please ! Fort Sumter was my 4th grade project , we all know who started the war .
They had no right or cause to secede. They were traitors who should have been hung in the town square . But Abe wanted the country to heal .
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
So your theory is that anything that isn't expressly authorized by the Constitution is prohibited?
Really?
The 10th Amendment is the secession clause.
This ?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
You mean a bunch of hand picked Lincoln cronies tried to justify the war after the fact, and they failed miserably.If the Supreme Court was able to find a privacy clause in the Constitution, it can probably find a secession clause there, too. Liberals argue that it is a living document that will give birth to any clauses they happen to need.Right next to the privacy clause.You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
Lol. Funny how "strict constitutionalists " aren't so strict when they don't want to be .
The Supreme Court has already said no.
Bernie is a Democrat. He wasn't and now he is. I'm sure there would be imbarassing things to find at the RNC, but the Wikileaks were only significant in exposing how the Democratic Party has rigged the system so that another George McGovern or a Bernie Sanders can never win the nomination.Sanders' supporters saw it as corruption, and the only casualty of the Wikileaks publications was Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who orchestrated efforts to keep Sanders from winning.So does this mean you think Wikileaks did America a favor by exposing the corruption at the DNC?Here's a good example, a foreign one, of someone being called a traitor, but from the outside you might consider things in a different light.
Yuliya Stepanova: What do Russians think of doping whistleblower? - BBC News
Yuliya Stepanova came out and basically got the Russian Olympic team banned from the Olympics.
She's been called a traitor. As one woman put it: "She blackened our government and the whole country."
But had the people who are in charge not done this in the first place, probably right from the top at some level of input, then she wouldn't have had to have done what she did. Does that mean she is the traitor, or the ones who allowed the drugs to be used are the traitors?
What corruption? They are a political party . The whole point is to favor their candidate .
Of course he did . But here's the thing .....Bernies not a democrat !!!!
You saw the same with the "never Trump " crowd .
Do you really think the GOP emails are all smiles n sunshine if they got out ? You don't think they weren't bullshit about Trump ?
You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.Please ! Fort Sumter was my 4th grade project , we all know who started the war .
They had no right or cause to secede. They were traitors who should have been hung in the town square . But Abe wanted the country to heal .
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
So your theory is that anything that isn't expressly authorized by the Constitution is prohibited?
Really?
The 10th Amendment is the secession clause.
This ?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Yes. That.
lol In 1869. The Court didn't know about the privacy clause then either.If the Supreme Court was able to find a privacy clause in the Constitution, it can probably find a secession clause there, too. Liberals argue that it is a living document that will give birth to any clauses they happen to need.Right next to the privacy clause.You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
Lol. Funny how "strict constitutionalists " aren't so strict when they don't want to be .
The Supreme Court has already said no.
You were pumped full of propaganda in the 4th grade.
Ft Sumter is where some Union trespassers refused to leave the territory of SC when they were asked. SC was well within its rights to fire on them. Lincoln even had Union ships invade the territorial waters of South Carolina in an illegal effort to resupply the fort.
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
So your theory is that anything that isn't expressly authorized by the Constitution is prohibited?
Really?
The 10th Amendment is the secession clause.
This ?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Yes. That.
And that's why it failed when it went to court !
You're the one taught bullshit .
Where's the secession clause in the constitution?
So your theory is that anything that isn't expressly authorized by the Constitution is prohibited?
Really?
The 10th Amendment is the secession clause.
This ?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Yes. That.
And that's why it failed when it went to court !
It failed because Lincoln packed the court with his cronies, and after the war they tried to justify it.
So your theory is that anything that isn't expressly authorized by the Constitution is prohibited?
Really?
The 10th Amendment is the secession clause.
This ?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Yes. That.
And that's why it failed when it went to court !
It failed because Lincoln packed the court with his cronies, and after the war they tried to justify it.
Whatever .
You want Bergdal strung up as a traitor cause he wanders off his base , but your cool with what the confederates did!?? WTF!
I think this Russian babe is a whistleblower NOT a traitor.Here's a good example, a foreign one, of someone being called a traitor, but from the outside you might consider things in a different light.
Yuliya Stepanova: What do Russians think of doping whistleblower? - BBC News
Yuliya Stepanova came out and basically got the Russian Olympic team banned from the Olympics.
She's been called a traitor. As one woman put it: "She blackened our government and the whole country."
But had the people who are in charge not done this in the first place, probably right from the top at some level of input, then she wouldn't have had to have done what she did. Does that mean she is the traitor, or the ones who allowed the drugs to be used are the traitors?
Benedict Arnold was actually an American hero before he turned.I don't care. We have bigger fish to fry, and we have Benedict Arnold, a hero to the English Crown. Let's split hairs and blame the knife.Here's a good example, a foreign one, of someone being called a traitor, but from the outside you might consider things in a different light.
Yuliya Stepanova: What do Russians think of doping whistleblower? - BBC News
Yuliya Stepanova came out and basically got the Russian Olympic team banned from the Olympics.
She's been called a traitor. As one woman put it: "She blackened our government and the whole country."
But had the people who are in charge not done this in the first place, probably right from the top at some level of input, then she wouldn't have had to have done what she did. Does that mean she is the traitor, or the ones who allowed the drugs to be used are the traitors?
