Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There wouldn't be a complete end of all entitlement programs over night. You can't simply take away Social Security from those who have paid into it their whole lives and are now dependent on it. However, you can shore up those programs by changing our militaristic foreign policy to a non-interventionist foreign policy and diverting those funds. Then those who are dependent on those programs can still use them, and those who are not can then begin to keep more of their own money and make their own plans for their future.
everyone would be allowed to possess their own nuke, right kev?
There wouldn't be a complete end of all entitlement programs over night. You can't simply take away Social Security from those who have paid into it their whole lives and are now dependent on it. However, you can shore up those programs by changing our militaristic foreign policy to a non-interventionist foreign policy and diverting those funds. Then those who are dependent on those programs can still use them, and those who are not can then begin to keep more of their own money and make their own plans for their future.
What if it's a Genocide issue?
There wouldn't be a complete end of all entitlement programs over night. You can't simply take away Social Security from those who have paid into it their whole lives and are now dependent on it. However, you can shore up those programs by changing our militaristic foreign policy to a non-interventionist foreign policy and diverting those funds. Then those who are dependent on those programs can still use them, and those who are not can then begin to keep more of their own money and make their own plans for their future.
What if it's a Genocide issue?
I don't understand what you mean.
What if it's a Genocide issue?
I don't understand what you mean.
Meaning..
If there is a Tyrannical Leader killing its own people are we gonna stand back or act?
I don't understand what you mean.
Meaning..
If there is a Tyrannical Leader killing its own people are we gonna stand back or act?
Non-interventionism means we handle our affairs. We can't be the policemen of the world.
Imho it would lead quickly to citizen revolt once most of the govt that actually helped the people went away.
How would libertarians handle that?
Meaning..
If there is a Tyrannical Leader killing its own people are we gonna stand back or act?
Non-interventionism means we handle our affairs. We can't be the policemen of the world.
So.. If another country is killing itself we have no obligation as part of NATO and our Military to intervene and take him out?
Non-interventionism means we handle our affairs. We can't be the policemen of the world.
So.. If another country is killing itself we have no obligation as part of NATO and our Military to intervene and take him out?
We shouldn't be in NATO, and no we should not intervene. We can't stop all the evil in the world, and most of the time we end up causing more problems than we solve.
[America] goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. - John Quincy Adams
So.. If another country is killing itself we have no obligation as part of NATO and our Military to intervene and take him out?
We shouldn't be in NATO, and no we should not intervene. We can't stop all the evil in the world, and most of the time we end up causing more problems than we solve.
[America] goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. - John Quincy Adams
We should be part of NATO. We should be keeping our Alliances strong. Who knows if another Dictator decides to invade another country?
That's in the 1700's.. We are in 2010.. We're at War and have Muslim Extremists trying to kill us all..
This is the only issue that i don't agree with the Libertarian Party.. Other than that i'm a Conservative Libertarian..
We shouldn't be in NATO, and no we should not intervene. We can't stop all the evil in the world, and most of the time we end up causing more problems than we solve.
[America] goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. - John Quincy Adams
We should be part of NATO. We should be keeping our Alliances strong. Who knows if another Dictator decides to invade another country?
That's in the 1700's.. We are in 2010.. We're at War and have Muslim Extremists trying to kill us all..
This is the only issue that i don't agree with the Libertarian Party.. Other than that i'm a Conservative Libertarian..
Sounds like you're simply a conservative honestly. Libertarians don't believe in entangling alliances that put our troops in harms way and our taxpayers on the line for the benefit of other nations, and that's exactly what NATO represents.
We should be part of NATO. We should be keeping our Alliances strong. Who knows if another Dictator decides to invade another country?
That's in the 1700's.. We are in 2010.. We're at War and have Muslim Extremists trying to kill us all..
This is the only issue that i don't agree with the Libertarian Party.. Other than that i'm a Conservative Libertarian..
Sounds like you're simply a conservative honestly. Libertarians don't believe in entangling alliances that put our troops in harms way and our taxpayers on the line for the benefit of other nations, and that's exactly what NATO represents.
I'm a Libertarian in other Polices. but not in our Foreign Policy. While i don't agree we should intervene in everything, we should help out our Allies and people who need our help.
Sounds like you're simply a conservative honestly. Libertarians don't believe in entangling alliances that put our troops in harms way and our taxpayers on the line for the benefit of other nations, and that's exactly what NATO represents.
I'm a Libertarian in other Polices. but not in our Foreign Policy. While i don't agree we should intervene in everything, we should help out our Allies and people who need our help.
Well in my opinion the division between conservative and libertarian is no clearer than in foreign policy, but I'm certainly not going to argue with you about what ideology you hold with.
Imho it would lead quickly to citizen revolt once most of the govt that actually helped the people went away.
How would libertarians handle that?