What If Trump Decides To Tell Starmer He Has To Give The Falklands To Argentina?

[1srelluc]

nobody wants Canada

It would be OK if the Quebeckers were cleansed as a condition of a takeover.

 

[1srelluc]

Diego Garcia is where we will be telling the Brits to pound sand before long.

That said the Falklands would be a fine place to send the vile dems, and when that fills up we can take South Georgia/Sandwich Islands from the Brits for even more space.

Make sentencing to "Transportation" great again!

​

The term "transportation" historically refers to the punishment of sending individuals to a distant location, often a colony, for a specified term. This punishment was used for various crimes, including petty theft, and was a preferred alternative to capital punishment. The Transportation Act of 1718 in Britain was a significant development, as it became the only European country after 1700 to transport convicts as part of a major governmental policy. The act was popular among judges and quickly became the preferred punishment for crime, as it was seen as a more effective deterrent to recidivism than corporal punishment.

 

[Deadstick]

I'd love to see that. And what if Starmer tells Trump he has to give up Grenada?

Starmer would give Trump the falklands he is a coward, he is already rowing back on his stance against allowing US to launch attacks from the UK, American heavy bombers have already landed at RAF Fairford which is a British base in name only it is really a US base, years ago i had to visit there i hd to report to the Guard room have my photo taken etc, they were American military police and outside was a kid who looked about 16 with a M16.

 

[GLASNOST]

Starmer ... is already rowing back on his stance against allowing US to launch attacks from the UK,

Really? I may have misjudged him too harshly. From my point of view, obviously.

..... RAF Fairford ... is a British base in name only it is really a US base,

Well!

years ago i had to visit there i hd to report to the Guard room have my photo taken etc, they were American military police

Interesting.

... outside was a kid who looked about 16 with a M16.

I'm not sure he'd have been younger than 18 but I get your point. Speaking of the RAF I may have mentioned that I was employed as a civilian at RAF Gatow 1978-79. A worthwhile experience.

 

[Deadstick]

Really? I may have misjudged him too harshly. From my point of view, obviously.

Well!

Interesting.

I'm not sure he'd have been younger than 18 but I get your point. Speaking of the RAF I may have mentioned that I was employed as a civilian at RAF Gatow 1978-79. A worthwhile experience.

Same here RAF Gutersloh

 

[GLASNOST]

..... I may have mentioned that I was employed as a civilian at RAF Gatow 1978-79. A worthwhile experience.

Same here RAF Gutersloh

Oh my! Poached eggs & chips at the NAAFI and BFBS keeping us updated. I miss it but I can't explain why. Were you there the same time as me?

 

[ding]

Really? I may have misjudged him too harshly. From my point of view, obviously.

No. He's still a lap dog of the US.

The UK continues to cooperate closely with the US on intelligence, trade, and defense, despite recent friction regarding military action in the Middle East. While Prime Minister Keir Starmer has asserted that the "special relationship" remains strong with daily collaboration, President Trump has criticized the UK for not participating in initial strikes on Iran.
BBC +4
Key Aspects of Current Cooperation (as of March 2026):

• Defense & Intelligence: The UK remains a key military ally and continues to share intelligence with the US, though the UK has recently limited the use of its bases for certain offensive operations against Iran, focusing instead on "defensive" strikes.
• Trade: A 2025 "Economic Prosperity Deal" exists between the two nations, which aims to enhance industrial and agricultural market access, although it has faced challenges, including U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.
• Strained Relations: President Trump has publicly questioned the strength of the relationship, describing it as "not what it was" and criticizing the UK's level of involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts.
  ustr.gov +4

Despite these tensions, officials on both sides emphasize that the core operational, economic, and intelligence partnership remains in place.