- Moderator
- #61
So they make food and tobacco. Anything else? Seriously is that it?
Cars, trucks, airplanes, computers, ships, oil and gas equipment and much more.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So they make food and tobacco. Anything else? Seriously is that it?
Oil, natural gas, timber, lignite, cotton, pharmaceuticals, chemicals. Very little tobacco is grown in Mississippi. Not sure what made you think there was.So they make food and tobacco. Anything else? Seriously is that it?
You don't like it get the fuck out & go where one party rules. Russia comes to mind.There is no such thing as Red States and Blue states.
It is America and the Democrat controlled big city shitholes.
That is the divide in America.
It also has a GDP higher then many Countries.By the way Moon Bats. California is the bastion of Democrat control and has the worst education, most poverty, most homelesness, highest rents, highest taxation and biggest debt in the US.
It's so great that snowbirds head north in the spring. Who wants to spend all summer inside sucking up to an a.c.?That was moronic even for you, Surada! They're counting second homes that are owned by "snow birds" that don't happen to be in residence as "empty"! You seem to think that means nobody wants to move to Florida...which simply proves how clueless you are!
All these big city shitholes have one party rule. Democrats. See how fucked up they are.You don't like it get the fuck out & go where one party rules. Russia comes to mind.
Because it is living off when it was the Golden States before the filthy Democrats fucked everything up. It is quickly losing that wealth.It also has a GDP higher then many Countries.
No they don't.All these big city shitholes have one party rule. Democrats. See how fucked up they are.
Next time live in a better neighborhood. Would you like the name of my Realtor?I lived in Florida.. it's horrible and full of grifters.
Balance of payments is the amount of revenue paid to the federal government from a state’s residents and economy (taxes) minus the amount of federal spending in that state. Donor states pay more to the federal government in taxes than they receive back in funding.
Advanced states have been bankrolling the ne'er-do-wells, who often bite the generous hands that feed them by enacting retrogressive, discriminatory laws.
New York is the largest donor state in the U.S., with a negative balance of payments at $22,798,000,000.
The next six donor states and the negative balances of their contributions to the federal government are:
On the other end of the spectrum are these state with the amount they grab from the general coffers, a transfer of wealth from the fiscally successful ones:
- New Jersey (-$10,334,000,000)
- Massachusetts (-$9,919,000,000)
- California (-$6,653,000,000)
- Connecticut (-$5,754,000,000)
- Minnesota (-$1,896,000,000)
- Colorado ($1,374,000,000)
If beggar states insist on using their largesse from their benefactor states to fund their repressive statism - suppressing freedom and equality in such matters of public interest as voting, reproductive rights, public health, climatology, science teaching - instead financing rabid Statism in the form of gag orders, book banning, bureaucratic womb control, denial of an American's equality despite differences, why fund them?
- Kentucky ($63,229,000,000)
- Florida ($50,999,000,000)
- Maryland ($49,942,000,000)
- Ohio ($42,004,000,000)
- Pennsylvania ($41,516,000,000)
- North Carolina ($35,437,000,000)
- Alabama ($33,033,000,000)
I cannot pass an indigent on the street without giving him a few bucks, inquiring after his well-being, and listening to his concerns, but, if I found that he was using my meager benefaction for noxious purposes, would I not be justified in desisting from such discretionary allocation of my resources?
An individual and a society honoring the corporal works of mercy is a benison to both, but there is an assumption of responsibility.
In sharing one's prosperity, one should do no harm.
California?How about if the food producing states said no food for you!
Who do you think blinks first?
/-----/ And just like that democrats are against redistribution of wealth unless it lines their pockets.Balance of payments is the amount of revenue paid to the federal government from a state’s residents and economy (taxes) minus the amount of federal spending in that state. Donor states pay more to the federal government in taxes than they receive back in funding.
Advanced states have been bankrolling the ne'er-do-wells, who often bite the generous hands that feed them by enacting retrogressive, discriminatory laws.
New York is the largest donor state in the U.S., with a negative balance of payments at $22,798,000,000.
The next six donor states and the negative balances of their contributions to the federal government are:
On the other end of the spectrum are these state with the amount they grab from the general coffers, a transfer of wealth from the fiscally successful ones:
- New Jersey (-$10,334,000,000)
- Massachusetts (-$9,919,000,000)
- California (-$6,653,000,000)
- Connecticut (-$5,754,000,000)
- Minnesota (-$1,896,000,000)
- Colorado ($1,374,000,000)
If beggar states insist on using their largesse from their benefactor states to fund their repressive statism - suppressing freedom and equality in such matters of public interest as voting, reproductive rights, public health, climatology, science teaching - instead financing rabid Statism in the form of gag orders, book banning, bureaucratic womb control, denial of an American's equality despite differences, why fund them?
- Kentucky ($63,229,000,000)
- Florida ($50,999,000,000)
- Maryland ($49,942,000,000)
- Ohio ($42,004,000,000)
- Pennsylvania ($41,516,000,000)
- North Carolina ($35,437,000,000)
- Alabama ($33,033,000,000)
I cannot pass an indigent on the street without giving him a few bucks, inquiring after his well-being, and listening to his concerns, but, if I found that he was using my meager benefaction for noxious purposes, would I not be justified in desisting from such discretionary allocation of my resources?
An individual and a society honoring the corporal works of mercy is a benison to both, but there is an assumption of responsibility.
In sharing one's prosperity, one should do no harm.
We have to agree with your trajectory and questions, but the American prisoner, once again, refies America. Large migrations may happen due to choice though more by necessity. You can see the signs, Shanghai may be locked out, not covid-locked down, which will mean buying real estate in the Russian Far East:Politicians in the Dangling Appendage State should be especially concerned about anthropogenic climate change seeking revenge.
They'll be begging the federal government for money to bail them out.
Literally.
The better-educated, more prosperous states that are being fleeced to bankroll authoritarian regimes seem quite indulgent, actually./-----/ And just like that democrats are against redistribution of wealth unless it lines their pockets.
Boycott Chocolate Cities. DuhNew Orleans still hasn't recovered from Katrina after 17 years.
While Houston recovered from Harvey in a few years.
Dem cities "Chocolate cities" like NO are a fucken waste of oxygen.
You can do whatever the fuck you want.Balance of payments is the amount of revenue paid to the federal government from a state’s residents and economy (taxes) minus the amount of federal spending in that state. Donor states pay more to the federal government in taxes than they receive back in funding.
Advanced states have been bankrolling the ne'er-do-wells, who often bite the generous hands that feed them by enacting retrogressive, discriminatory laws.
New York is the largest donor state in the U.S., with a negative balance of payments at $22,798,000,000.
The next six donor states and the negative balances of their contributions to the federal government are:
On the other end of the spectrum are these state with the amount they grab from the general coffers, a transfer of wealth from the fiscally successful ones:
- New Jersey (-$10,334,000,000)
- Massachusetts (-$9,919,000,000)
- California (-$6,653,000,000)
- Connecticut (-$5,754,000,000)
- Minnesota (-$1,896,000,000)
- Colorado ($1,374,000,000)
If beggar states insist on using their largesse from their benefactor states to fund their repressive statism - suppressing freedom and equality in such matters of public interest as voting, reproductive rights, public health, climatology, science teaching - instead financing rabid Statism in the form of gag orders, book banning, bureaucratic womb control, denial of an American's equality despite differences, why fund them?
- Kentucky ($63,229,000,000)
- Florida ($50,999,000,000)
- Maryland ($49,942,000,000)
- Ohio ($42,004,000,000)
- Pennsylvania ($41,516,000,000)
- North Carolina ($35,437,000,000)
- Alabama ($33,033,000,000)
I cannot pass an indigent on the street without giving him a few bucks, inquiring after his well-being, and listening to his concerns, but, if I found that he was using my meager benefaction for noxious purposes, would I not be justified in desisting from such discretionary allocation of my resources?
An individual and a society honoring the corporal works of mercy is a benison to both, but there is an assumption of responsibility.
In sharing one's prosperity, one should do no harm.
/----/ And the more prosperous Americans are being fleeced to bankroll the nonproducers to the tune of $30 trillion dollars since 1964 and there are just as many poor as before.The better-educated, more prosperous states that are being fleeced to bankroll authoritarian regimes seem quite indulgent, actually.
California?
In any event you need not fret over the better-educated, more prosperous states cutting the allowances of the statist states anytime soon.
You're rapidly moving to an authoritarian state with no middle class. Do you want to have your rights dictated by fundamentalists?Exactly. Big cities in red states often go blue. Voters in upstate NY are a far cry from NYC. Most upstate New Yorkers I have met are ashamed of NYC voters. Unfortunately for them, they have to live under the politics those folks elect. Funny that many are moving out of the city due to crime to upstate but they STILL won’t put 2 and 2 together that it is the way they vote that caused the problem to start with. Seriously, liberalism is a mental disorder.