The current U.S. pandemic response from the federal government is about Deficit-Bucks. New Bank Deposits have increased $2.0 tril. in recent report. Organized Social Protest is easily well-funded. Banks are less likely to fail. Checks are less likely to bounce. Bills are more likely to be paid. China is blessed. China is more famous for longevity, less famous for commencing international responsibilities. Longevity affects us all--with actually, billions expected to die after that(?).
Protesters are not early retirees. Protesters will more and more likely become retirees, no longer working.
ourworldindata.org
So what has China indirectly created: The U.S. Federal Government, Bi-Partisan Stimulus Response. A second is expected soon. Rather than "Laws" of economics, then arithmetic has happened. The Total U.S. Credit Market has recently expanded, but in manner bringing balance to credit market over-extension. The U.S. Personal Income accounts total nearly $21.0 tril. The Federal Deficit is approaching $25.0 tril. Then there are state and local government deficits, then there are mortgages, then there is other secured debt. Then there is unsecured debt. At any rate: The Total Credit Market is about Four Times more than the Personal Income eventually to be used to repay it. Nearly a third of it, however: Is subject to the lesser stringent statutes regarded federal debt repayments. A giant post of personal income would help to bring total credit subject to usual repayment rules to about two times personal income.
Make the rectangle with the diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little dots from the left side, parallel the bottom and top--to the diagonal represents a usury-based pay raise--like an opinion poll, a snapshot one of many. Create quadrants in the rectangle. Generally: There is a visual showing that lower incomes do not matter. Like in Matthew 25: 14-30, they might as well take what raise they get--bury it, and take to the streets. So reasoned Karl Marx, without so-stating. Holy Fathers would not make the advice, but prayed for it anyway. And then there is Her Majesty's Protestant Church, and that pitiful revolution--same stuff, different guise.
And so The Ford Republicans created a per child equal amount tax credit, of offset the usury-based Payroll Tax. Matthew 20: 1-16--equal payments, regardless: Were in the mix. Money money in the market, less risk to credit. Senator McGovern had proposed a $1000 Stimulus for every man, woman, and child, Presbyterian heritage, or something. Senator Humphrey had no concept of Macro-Economic credit risk. President Nixon had done usury-based, wage and price controls. Arithmetic was under way, and could proceed. The 1986 Tax Reform would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions. The Obama Resurrection Stimulus would offer equal amount, refundable tax credits. The recent Bi-Partisan Stimulus went back more to Senator McGovern level basics.
The market-friendly arithmetic creates a market: Supportive of spending, and so credit ammortization--even when fewer are working.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(So out of Egypt, there would arise a child of Pharaoh's thinking(?): Deut 23: 19-20, Acts: 7.)
Protesters are not early retirees. Protesters will more and more likely become retirees, no longer working.
Life Expectancy
People are living longer across the world, but large differences remain. Explore global data on life expectancy and how it has changed over time.
ourworldindata.org
So what has China indirectly created: The U.S. Federal Government, Bi-Partisan Stimulus Response. A second is expected soon. Rather than "Laws" of economics, then arithmetic has happened. The Total U.S. Credit Market has recently expanded, but in manner bringing balance to credit market over-extension. The U.S. Personal Income accounts total nearly $21.0 tril. The Federal Deficit is approaching $25.0 tril. Then there are state and local government deficits, then there are mortgages, then there is other secured debt. Then there is unsecured debt. At any rate: The Total Credit Market is about Four Times more than the Personal Income eventually to be used to repay it. Nearly a third of it, however: Is subject to the lesser stringent statutes regarded federal debt repayments. A giant post of personal income would help to bring total credit subject to usual repayment rules to about two times personal income.
Make the rectangle with the diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little dots from the left side, parallel the bottom and top--to the diagonal represents a usury-based pay raise--like an opinion poll, a snapshot one of many. Create quadrants in the rectangle. Generally: There is a visual showing that lower incomes do not matter. Like in Matthew 25: 14-30, they might as well take what raise they get--bury it, and take to the streets. So reasoned Karl Marx, without so-stating. Holy Fathers would not make the advice, but prayed for it anyway. And then there is Her Majesty's Protestant Church, and that pitiful revolution--same stuff, different guise.
And so The Ford Republicans created a per child equal amount tax credit, of offset the usury-based Payroll Tax. Matthew 20: 1-16--equal payments, regardless: Were in the mix. Money money in the market, less risk to credit. Senator McGovern had proposed a $1000 Stimulus for every man, woman, and child, Presbyterian heritage, or something. Senator Humphrey had no concept of Macro-Economic credit risk. President Nixon had done usury-based, wage and price controls. Arithmetic was under way, and could proceed. The 1986 Tax Reform would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions. The Obama Resurrection Stimulus would offer equal amount, refundable tax credits. The recent Bi-Partisan Stimulus went back more to Senator McGovern level basics.
The market-friendly arithmetic creates a market: Supportive of spending, and so credit ammortization--even when fewer are working.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(So out of Egypt, there would arise a child of Pharaoh's thinking(?): Deut 23: 19-20, Acts: 7.)
