What if Obama made this November 8th a national holiday?

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,968
1,870
To counter the voters' suppression, openly admitted by some states' right wing politicians, what would happen if, by EO, Obama made the voting Tuesdays for national elections a public holiday?

Would this increase voters' turn-out? Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy? Would minority voters be more likely to vote during a national holiday?
 
To counter the voters' suppression, openly admitted by some states' right wing politicians, what would happen if, by EO, Obama made the voting Tuesdays for national elections a public holiday?

Would this increase voters' turn-out? Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy? Would minority voters be more likely to vote during a national holiday?
Obama could declare his birthday a national holiday, that doesn't mean it would be a PAID holiday.

2v95cb6.jpg

What do you mean I can't call it Vote For Hillary Day?
 
Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy?

Ummm... the ACTUAL RESULTS of "high voters turnout within a democracy" can, the last thing we need is more foaming at the mouth, clueless morons turning up the polls to vote themselves "free" gub'mint distributed goodies and voting away their own and everybody Else's liberty .

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -- Winston Churchill
 
To counter the voters' suppression, openly admitted by some states' right wing politicians, what would happen if, by EO, Obama made the voting Tuesdays for national elections a public holiday?

Would this increase voters' turn-out? Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy? Would minority voters be more likely to vote during a national holiday?


What if he offered everyone under 25 $1,000 if they vote?

What if he said he has a "pen and a phone" and just appoints Hillary?

What if...

:lmao:

Poor Bolsheviks, it wasn't supposed to be like this... Hillary was anointed.
 
We should move the 11/11 vets day holiday to that voting day .

Tuesday voting is antiquated . But you'd need an amendment to the con to change it!
 
Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy?

Ummm... the ACTUAL RESULTS of "high voters turnout within a democracy" can, the last thing we need is more foaming at the mouth, clueless morons turning up the polls to vote themselves "free" gub'mint distributed goodies and voting away their own and everybody Else's liberty .

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -- Winston Churchill

I can't help but notice an elitist attitude behind your fear of universal suffrage.

By the way, Churchill also said: At the bottom of all the tributes paid to democracy is the little man, walking into the little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper—no amount of rhetoric or voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of that point.


 
Maybe we can just do away with voting and have George Soros appoint our rulers?


So, your "intelligent conclusion" is that if more people...who are eligible to vote...actually do, then right wingers are in serious trouble, correct?
 
We should move the 11/11 vets day holiday to that voting day .

Tuesday voting is antiquated . But you'd need an amendment to the con to change it!

Maybe we can just do away with voting and have George Soros appoint our rulers?
Its the GOP which fears high voter turnout. And you clearly have a reading comprehension problem. Timmy is saying Election Day should be on a day in which one does not have to choose between work and voting.
 
Maybe we can just do away with voting and have George Soros appoint our rulers?


So, your "intelligent conclusion" is that if more people...who are eligible to vote...actually do, then right wingers are in serious trouble, correct?
That's exactly what those who look down their noses at voters are saying, though they don't know it.
 
Who can openly argue AGAINST a high voters' turnout within a democracy?

Ummm... the ACTUAL RESULTS of "high voters turnout within a democracy" can, the last thing we need is more foaming at the mouth, clueless morons turning up the polls to vote themselves "free" gub'mint distributed goodies and voting away their own and everybody Else's liberty .

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -- Winston Churchill
Your mistake is that you STILL believe the GOP loses the Presidential election "because gifts".

The actual reason is because the GOP broadcasts hate and fear and pessimism 24/7. That kind of strategy attracts very ugly, spiritually dead people and turns off everyone else.
 
So "democracy" is based on the party bribing certain segments of society to vote?

Bolsheviks........ :lol:


If you could prove "bribery" then you may have a point....BUT, just admit it (its good for the soul) you'd rather that just old, white, conservative republicans should be allowed to vote.....Come on, admit it!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top