Obama library to require ID to enter.

[rightwinger]

But no proof of residency for voting... more important to get that discount to you idiots.

Of course there is
You have your residency verified when you register to vote

 

[OldFlame]

Of course there is
You have your residency verified when you register to vote

That doesn't prove it's the same person that shows up at the polling place, or that it's the same person that mailed the ballot in.

 

[OldFlame]

Soon they should be able to use AI to match every mail in ballot signature to the state id signature on file and be accurate within .01 percent, if not more. It will be interesting to see how Dumocrats fight that from being implemented.

 

[rightwinger]

That doesn't prove it's the same person that shows up at the polling place, or that it's the same person that mailed the ballot in.

Sign here sir

 

[OldFlame]

Sign here sir

Signatures that aren't checked, intentionally? Soon humans will not be the ones checking the signatures, then what?

 

[rightwinger]

Signatures that aren't checked, intentionally? Soon humans will not be the ones checking the signatures, then what?

Of course they are checked
They verify mine every time I vote

it is easier to get a fake ID than to fake a signature real time

 

[OldFlame]

Of course they are checked
They verify mine every time I vote

it is easier to get a fake ID than to fake a signature real time

They will be checked by AI in the future, no room for human error, can't wait.

 

[rightwinger]

They will be checked by AI in the future, no room for human error, can't wait.

AI?

DNA Baby!
You OK with it?

 

[OldFlame]

AI?

DNA Baby!
You OK with it?

Where did I mention DNA? Can you read for comprehension? Apparently not.

 

[rightwinger]

Where did I mention DNA? Can you read for comprehension? Apparently not.

Who needs AI when you can collect everyone’s DNA

 

[OldFlame]

Who needs AI when you can collect everyone’s DNA

AI can be used to match the signature at the polling place or on the mail in ballot to see if it matches the one on file with the state issued ID. Poll workers will no longer be the ones determining if it matches or not, sucks to be a dumocrat when that happens.

 

[WorldWatcher]

AI can be used to match the signature at the polling place or on the mail in ballot to see if it matches the one on file with the state issued ID. Poll workers will no longer be the ones determining if it matches or not, sucks to be a dumocrat when that happens.

Poll workers will always be the ones making the final call for rejection of a voters ballot.

I can see AI being used for high speed scanning and recognition. More than a few states are using image capture from multiple sources (years of drivers license signatures, voter registration signatures) etc. They are not comparing - for the most part - one signature on one form as signatgures change over time. Sometime someone may sign something as "World Watcher", another time as "World A. Watcher", another time as "World Andrew Watcher". AI systems can take multiple "aged" and variations and determine a probability of match.

If an AI system "passes" a ballot it proceeds, but you can bet that if an AI system rejects a ballot it will go humans (plural on purpose) for review to accept or reject under strict quidlines, if that human rejects it will typically go require an Election Supervisor for final rejection.

WW

 

[OldFlame]

Poll workers will always be the ones making the final call for rejection of a voters ballot.

I can see AI being used for high speed scanning and recognition. More than a few states are using image capture from multiple sources (years of drivers license signatures, voter registration signatures) etc. They are not comparing - for the most part - one signature on one form as signatgures change over time. Sometime someone may sign something as "World Watcher", another time as "World A. Watcher", another time as "World Andrew Watcher". AI systems can take multiple "aged" and variations and determine a probability of match.

If an AI system "passes" a ballot it proceeds, but you can bet that if an AI system rejects a ballot it will go humans (plural on purpose) for review to accept or reject under strict quidlines, if that human rejects it will typically go require an Election Supervisor for final rejection.

WW

No human eye can evaluate two signatures for a match as well as AI, it's coming.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No human eye can evaluate two signatures for a match as well as AI, it's coming.

I agree.

But the rejection of a voter’s vote will be a human call.

WW

 

[rightwinger]

AI can be used to match the signature at the polling place or on the mail in ballot to see if it matches the one on file with the state issued ID. Poll workers will no longer be the ones determining if it matches or not, sucks to be a dumocrat when that happens.

Why not facial recognition and DNA to prevent voter fraud?

 

[OldFlame]

I agree.

But the rejection of a voter’s vote will be a human call.

WW

Why, when you agree that AI will be infallible regarding signature comparison, there would be no need or reason for human intervention. Not to mention that AI should be completely unbiased in its acceptance or rejection when a human is not.

 

[OldFlame]

Why not facial recognition and DNA to prevent voter fraud?

Sure, I'll agree with facial when mail in voting is no longer a valid form of voting.