What if Israel Quite Trying to Play the Nice Guy

[Roudy]

1. Gaza was not "handed back" it was turned into a large concentration camp under complete Israeli perimeter control.

2. The Israeli Jews have never had any intention of relinquishing control over the Christians and Muslims and have never had any intention of allowing the establishment of a Palestinian state.

1. Gaza was handed back in 2005. No Jews. Guess what the animals did? They elected a terrorist organization who started shooting rockets at Israel.

2. Israel has had serious peace talks, the latest serious ones occured during the last months of Clinton's presidency. By all objective accounts Arafat walked away from getting 90% of what Palestinians wanted: West Bank, Gaza, and partial control of Muslim sections of Jerusalem. Apparently that meant that Palestinian animals would have to stop trying to commit genocide on the jews, and Arafat won't be able to keep stealing his people's money and actually run a country as opposed to be a terrorist leader.

3. You are a Jew hating liar and an idiot.

 

[montelatici]

1. Gaza was not "handed over" it was converted into a large concentration camp where non-Jews were concentrated into an area whose perimeter, air space and territorial sea is completely controlled by Israel.

2. What was offered by Barak were three Palestinian areas in the area of the West Bank, cut off from each other and Gaza, a group of land areas surrounded by Israeli military installations and fortified Jewish settlements with the IDF having the right to patrol within each of the areas. Not to mention Jewish only roads crisscrossing these areas. It was not a viable or sovereign state.
Your propaganda fools no one that has actually read the agreement and seen the maps.

3. Ad hominem insults. Grow up punk.

 

[Boston1]

1. Gaza was not "handed over" it was converted into a large concentration camp where non-Jews were concentrated into an area whose perimeter, air space and territorial sea is completely controlled by Israel.

2. What was offered by Barak were three Palestinian areas in the area of the West Bank, cut off from each other and Gaza, a group of land areas surrounded by Israeli military installations and fortified Jewish settlements with the IDF having the right to patrol within each of the areas. Not to mention Jewish only roads crisscrossing these areas. It was not a viable or sovereign state.
Your propaganda fools no one that has actually read the agreement and seen the maps.

3. Ad hominem insults. Grow up punk.

1) Gaza was most certainly handed over. Israel unilaterally withdrew IMHO just to prove that the pali's couldn't live up to their end of the agreement, which of course they didn't

2) What was offered was a beginning, one which gave the pali's a chance to prove their peaceful intentions, and a test which they as usual failed miserably.

3) From the queen of add hominem, you don't seriously think anyone is taking you seriously do you ?

 

[Shusha]

I agree Gaza was a test. And I agree that the Gazans failed that test miserably. They could have had a thriving nation by now. Imagine the tourist industry that they could develop!

 

[montelatici]

1. Gaza was converted into a concentration camp blockaded from the outaset. It could never thrive under the blockade.
2. What was offered by Barak was the beginning of continued settlement in the divided sections of the West Bank which could never become viable state.
3. You are the king of personal attacks. Hiding behind your computer. In person you would cower like the punk you are.

 

[Boston1]

1. Gaza was converted into a concentration camp blockaded from the outaset. It could never thrive under the blockade.
2. What was offered by Barak was the beginning of continued settlement in the divided sections of the West Bank which could never become viable state.
3. You are the king of personal attacks. Hiding behind your computer. In person you would cower like the punk you are.

1) Gaza was handed over to the palestinians who instead of establishing a state immediately began a series of failed terror campaigns

2) What was offered was a chance, a chance the pali's screwed up just like every other chance they had

3) That ad hominem you are always accusing others of

 

[montelatici]

1. Gaza was never handed over. The Israelis just created a concentration camp whose perimeter they control.

2. The Israelis never offered a sovereign state for non-Jews. Israelis will never allow people of any other religion to have self rule. Israeli Jews have to rule over non-Jews, that's what they do.

3. Your disgusting friends are always insulting other posters.

 

[Billo_Really]

I agree Gaza was a test. And I agree that the Gazans failed that test miserably. They could have had a thriving nation by now. Imagine the tourist industry that they could develop!

Are you on crack?

How could they possibly have tourism, when Israel won't allow anyone in or out?

Christ, they murder people bringing in humanitarian aid! How the **** could they possibly have a "tourist industry"?

You are "out there"!

But it is typical Zionist garbage.

 

[Billo_Really]

1) Gaza was most certainly handed over.

If Gaza was handed over, then why can't they leave?

 

[rhodescholar]

1. Gaza was not "handed back" it was turned into a large concentration camp under complete Israeli perimeter control.

2. The Israeli Jews have never had any intention of relinquishing control over the Christians and Muslims and have never had any intention of allowing the establishment of a Palestinian state.

This is why I keep this c-nt on ignore, it really has nothing of value to offer, ever.

It is astounding that a c-nt like you defending hamas - who has ethnically cleansed most of the christians out of gaza, is actually whining about the treatment of christians.

Second, why aren't ******* turds like you complaining that hamas is using all of the imported concrete it can get its hands on to build tunnels instead of rebuilding damaged homes and infrastructure?

Pieces of shit like this poster should be placed on ignore from everyone so that it will just leave. Garbage like this poster add nothing to the conversation, and should be treated like the turd it is.

 

[rhodescholar]

2. What was offered by Barak were three Palestinian areas in the area of the West Bank, cut off from each other and Gaza, a group of land areas surrounded by Israeli military installations and fortified Jewish settlements with the IDF having the right to patrol within each of the areas. Not to mention Jewish only roads crisscrossing these areas. It was not a viable or sovereign state.

C--nt, what was the arab muslim counter offer? Did they make one, or walk out and start more violence? You ******* lowlife filth.

 

[rhodescholar]

Christ, they murder people bringing in humanitarian aid! How the **** could they possibly have a "tourist industry"?.

This piece of lowlife shit is still here? These people are clearly getting paid, no sane person would be attacking jews for this long unless they were on a payroll.

Scumbag, who did the Israelis "murder" bringing in aid? Tell us, idiot asshole.

 

[Roudy]

1) Gaza was most certainly handed over.

If Gaza was handed over, then why can't they leave?

Gaza isn't governed by the Israelis, dumbass.

 

[Billo_Really]

This piece of lowlife shit is still here? These people are clearly getting paid, no sane person would be attacking jews for this long unless they were on a payroll.

I haven't said anything about Jews.

Scumbag, who did the Israelis "murder" bringing in aid? Tell us, idiot asshole.

U.N. Report finds Israel “summarily executed” U.S. citizen on flotilla

...the report “shows conclusively, for the first time, that US citizen Furkan Dogan and five Turkish citizens were murdered execution-style by Israeli commandos.”​

And just by chance you happen to find your soul and would like to send his mum some flowers, here's what he looked like before the Israeli's blew a hole in the back of his head, for being in possession of illegal food!

 

[Billo_Really]

Gaza isn't governed by the Israelis, dumbass.

Then why can't they leave?

 

[Billo_Really]

C--nt, what was the arab muslim counter offer? Did they make one, or walk out and start more violence? You ******* lowlife filth.

All you had to do was ask, 'ole bean!

Rather than calling for Israel’s destruction...Hamas...reiterated its goal of establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel within the 1967 borders.

The top Hamas official in Gaza, Mahmoud al-Zahar, said if Israel “is ready to give us the national demand to withdraw from the occupied area [in] ’67; to release our detainees; to stop their aggression; Hamas...was willing to “accept to establish our independent state on the area occupied [in] ’67”, a tacit recognition of the state of Israel.
​

Israel's response to the Hamas olive branch?

...rather than encouraging Hamas’s engagement in the political process, Israel continued to seek to isolate the group. Instead of encouraging Hamas to moderate its behavior, Israel continued to attempt to provoke the group into a violent response.

Israel sent the message to Hamas that its steps towards moderation and political engagement would bear no fruit.

When Hamas cleaned the streets, Israeli bulldozers and tanks destroyed them, and when Hamas erected streetlights, Israeli soldiers shot them out.​

Is shooting out streetlights, playing nice?

 

[Billo_Really]

This is why I keep this c-nt on ignore, it really has nothing of value to offer, ever.

It is astounding that a c-nt like you defending hamas - who has ethnically cleansed most of the christians out of gaza, is actually whining about the treatment of christians.

Second, why aren't ******* turds like you complaining that hamas is using all of the imported concrete it can get its hands on to build tunnels instead of rebuilding damaged homes and infrastructure?

Pieces of shit like this poster should be placed on ignore from everyone so that it will just leave. Garbage like this poster add nothing to the conversation, and should be treated like the turd it is.

Is that what Zionists call "playing nice"?

 

[P F Tinmore]

1. Gaza was not "handed back" it was turned into a large concentration camp under complete Israeli perimeter control.

2. The Israeli Jews have never had any intention of relinquishing control over the Christians and Muslims and have never had any intention of allowing the establishment of a Palestinian state.

This is why I keep this c-nt on ignore, it really has nothing of value to offer, ever.

It is astounding that a c-nt like you defending hamas - who has ethnically cleansed most of the christians out of gaza, is actually whining about the treatment of christians.

Second, why aren't ******* turds like you complaining that hamas is using all of the imported concrete it can get its hands on to build tunnels instead of rebuilding damaged homes and infrastructure?

Pieces of shit like this poster should be placed on ignore from everyone so that it will just leave. Garbage like this poster add nothing to the conversation, and should be treated like the turd it is.

It is astounding that a c-nt like you defending hamas - who has ethnically cleansed most of the christians out of gaza, is actually whining about the treatment of christians.​

 

[rhodescholar]

Rather than calling for Israel’s destruction...Hamas...reiterated its goal of establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel within the 1967 borders.

Was hamas at the 2000 negotiations, idiot asshole? What does hamas have to do with the Taba events, moron?

Was hamas unified in accepting Israel, or was that just one person talking, who later retracted his statement? Did meshaal and haniyah and all of the leaders of the group publicly come out and agree to this? NO THEY DID NOT.

Are you so ******* stupid that you think you can toss out BS and not get called on it, you non-credible POS?

 

[rhodescholar]

U.N. Report finds Israel “summarily executed” U.S. citizen on flotilla

Try the facts, c-nt.

IDF forces met with pre-planned violence when attempting to board flotilla

"The flotilla members on board the Mavi Marmara publicly expressed their readiness to die on board the ship as 'shahids' - additional proof the hard core of IHH operatives had prepared for a violent confrontation with the Israeli forces.
The following video contains interviews of flotilla members:

• Shaza Barakat, one of the women passengers about the Mavi Marmara, interviewed by Al-Jazeera TV two days before the takeover of the ship, said "Two good things will happen: either we'll die as martyrs or we'll reach Gaza."
• One of the passengers interviewed during the voyage said he wanted to die as a shahid. He said he had participated in two previous convoys and wanted to be a shahid and twice he had been "unlucky." He was not, he said, afraid of 'those cockroaches' (Israelis).
• Hussein Urush, a senior IHH member and one of the organizers of the flotilla, interviewed by Al-Jazeera TV a few days after the takeover that all the passengers were prepared to die as martyrs and that the goal of the flotilla was to reach Gaza or die trying.
  Source: מל"מ - המרכז למורשת מודיעין | מרכז המידע למודיעין ולטרור על שם אלוף מאיר עמית