What Has Obama Done to Warrant Impeachment?

[Mac1958]

.

Chuck Todd gets it right. Our "leaders" are an embarrassment.

Video: Chuck Todd: Impeachment talk 'embarrassing' - POLITICO.com

 

[mudwhistle]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Your name should be changed from "Runs with Scissors" to "Runs from his Impeachment Smack Talk".

So after weeks of talking a bunch of smack about impeachment, you guys found that doesn't really poll very well.

You're a compulsive liar of course.

Plenty of people feel an impeachment is what is needed but most believe it would be a waste of time as long as there are enough Democrats in Congress to block it from actually being a possibility.

 

[Interpol]

Republicans are such pussies.

Just impeach him already and stop talking about it.

Of course, they can't actually impeach him, that's only a realistic option among themselves and their insulated bubble, which says Obama is so weak and yet such a tyrant ALL at the same time.

Loved Boehner's little presser a couple weeks back when he was asked, "What are you going to sue him for?" and Boehner was basically like, "I dunno, we'll find something".

Republicans, from day one of Obama, started at impeachment and then worked back from there.

Of course, if you give John McCain these last 6 years and with all of the exact same results, they'd be hailing their guy for overseeing a record Dow Jones, the saving of capitalism, a falling deficit 6 years in a row now, 50 consecutive months of private sector job growth, the recovery of all the jobs lost during the crash, record deportations, record oil-drilling, record Wall Street profiteering, tax cuts for 95% of Americans, the killings of Bin Laden and Gaddafi and the droning of many top Al Qaeda people, sanctions on Russia, and of course, the first major healthcare reforms to be passed in 40 years, based on what Dole and Gingrich and the rest of the 90's Republicans wanted, which was an individual mandate and more personal responsibility when it comes to health care.

Obama's record is pretty stellar for a moderate Republican President, but since he's black and agrees with them on a number of things, they'll never admit it and have to continue this ruse that somehow he's impeachable when we all know he isn't.

 

[JoeB131]

[

You're a compulsive liar of course.

Plenty of people feel an impeachment is what is needed but most believe it would be a waste of time as long as there are enough Democrats in Congress to block it from actually being a possibility.

In short, you can't win at the ballot box, so you are trying other means.

It's like you didn't learn a ******* thing from the Lewinsky fiasco.

 

[JoeB131]

Republicans are such pussies.

Just impeach him already and stop talking about it.

Of course, they can't actually impeach him, that's only a realistic option among themselves and their insulated bubble, which says Obama is so weak and yet such a tyrant ALL at the same time.

Loved Boehner's little presser a couple weeks back when he was asked, "What are you going to sue him for?" and Boehner was basically like, "I dunno, we'll find something".

Republicans, from day one of Obama, started at impeachment and then worked back from there.

Of course, if you give John McCain these last 6 years and with all of the exact same results, they'd be hailing their guy for overseeing a record Dow Jones, the saving of capitalism, a falling deficit 6 years in a row now, 50 consecutive months of private sector job growth, the recovery of all the jobs lost during the crash, record deportations, record oil-drilling, record Wall Street profiteering, tax cuts for 95% of Americans, the killings of Bin Laden and Gaddafi and the droning of many top Al Qaeda people, sanctions on Russia, and of course, the first major healthcare reforms to be passed in 40 years, based on what Dole and Gingrich and the rest of the 90's Republicans wanted, which was an individual mandate and more personal responsibility when it comes to health care.

Obama's record is pretty stellar for a moderate Republican President, but since he's black and agrees with them on a number of things, they'll never admit it and have to continue this ruse that somehow he's impeachable when we all know he isn't.

Word!

 

[mudwhistle]

Republicans are such pussies.

Just impeach him already and stop talking about it.

Of course, they can't actually impeach him, that's only a realistic option among themselves and their insulated bubble, which says Obama is so weak and yet such a tyrant ALL at the same time.

Loved Boehner's little presser a couple weeks back when he was asked, "What are you going to sue him for?" and Boehner was basically like, "I dunno, we'll find something".

Republicans, from day one of Obama, started at impeachment and then worked back from there.

Of course, if you give John McCain these last 6 years and with all of the exact same results, they'd be hailing their guy for overseeing a record Dow Jones, the saving of capitalism, a falling deficit 6 years in a row now, 50 consecutive months of private sector job growth, the recovery of all the jobs lost during the crash, record deportations, record oil-drilling, record Wall Street profiteering, tax cuts for 95% of Americans, the killings of Bin Laden and Gaddafi and the droning of many top Al Qaeda people, sanctions on Russia, and of course, the first major healthcare reforms to be passed in 40 years, based on what Dole and Gingrich and the rest of the 90's Republicans wanted, which was an individual mandate and more personal responsibility when it comes to health care.

Obama's record is pretty stellar for a moderate Republican President, but since he's black and agrees with them on a number of things, they'll never admit it and have to continue this ruse that somehow he's impeachable when we all know he isn't.

Why don't you put your thumb up your butt.

You'll get a better result from that than an impeachment would get right now.

 

[mudwhistle]

Republicans are such pussies.

Just impeach him already and stop talking about it.

Of course, they can't actually impeach him, that's only a realistic option among themselves and their insulated bubble, which says Obama is so weak and yet such a tyrant ALL at the same time.

Loved Boehner's little presser a couple weeks back when he was asked, "What are you going to sue him for?" and Boehner was basically like, "I dunno, we'll find something".

Republicans, from day one of Obama, started at impeachment and then worked back from there.

Of course, if you give John McCain these last 6 years and with all of the exact same results, they'd be hailing their guy for overseeing a record Dow Jones, the saving of capitalism, a falling deficit 6 years in a row now, 50 consecutive months of private sector job growth, the recovery of all the jobs lost during the crash, record deportations, record oil-drilling, record Wall Street profiteering, tax cuts for 95% of Americans, the killings of Bin Laden and Gaddafi and the droning of many top Al Qaeda people, sanctions on Russia, and of course, the first major healthcare reforms to be passed in 40 years, based on what Dole and Gingrich and the rest of the 90's Republicans wanted, which was an individual mandate and more personal responsibility when it comes to health care.

Obama's record is pretty stellar for a moderate Republican President, but since he's black and agrees with them on a number of things, they'll never admit it and have to continue this ruse that somehow he's impeachable when we all know he isn't.

Word!

The word is Bullshit.

 

[zeke]

Gunslinger: So can you link Obama himself to any of that?

It's going to have to wait until tomorrow.. I'm overly sleepy

LMFAO. Yea, you get right on that. Repubs are awaiting your wisdom on how to impeach.
As soon as your nappy is over.

Did you mean to be funny?

 

[Peach]

Republicans are such pussies.

Just impeach him already and stop talking about it.

Of course, they can't actually impeach him, that's only a realistic option among themselves and their insulated bubble, which says Obama is so weak and yet such a tyrant ALL at the same time.

Loved Boehner's little presser a couple weeks back when he was asked, "What are you going to sue him for?" and Boehner was basically like, "I dunno, we'll find something".

Republicans, from day one of Obama, started at impeachment and then worked back from there.

Of course, if you give John McCain these last 6 years and with all of the exact same results, they'd be hailing their guy for overseeing a record Dow Jones, the saving of capitalism, a falling deficit 6 years in a row now, 50 consecutive months of private sector job growth, the recovery of all the jobs lost during the crash, record deportations, record oil-drilling, record Wall Street profiteering, tax cuts for 95% of Americans, the killings of Bin Laden and Gaddafi and the droning of many top Al Qaeda people, sanctions on Russia, and of course, the first major healthcare reforms to be passed in 40 years, based on what Dole and Gingrich and the rest of the 90's Republicans wanted, which was an individual mandate and more personal responsibility when it comes to health care.

Obama's record is pretty stellar for a moderate Republican President, but since he's black and agrees with them on a number of things, they'll never admit it and have to continue this ruse that somehow he's impeachable when we all know he isn't.

Why don't you put your thumb up your butt.

You'll get a better result from that than an impeachment would get right now.

Effort on getting a Republican majority in the Senate would be a wiser expenditure of time, but garners less media coverage.

 

[billyerock1991]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Your name should be changed from "Runs with Scissors" to "Runs from his Impeachment Smack Talk".

So after weeks of talking a bunch of smack about impeachment, you guys found that doesn't really poll very well.

you hit the nail right on the head ... they have found out that it will be their down fall if they, how did you say it, "run with scissors"

 

[Freewill]

Obama and the CIA have created a death list that is well known.

That death list was used to target AMERICAN citizens, no matter how low some they were still AMERICANS and Obama had them killed without DUE PROCESS. Even the son of one of them was targeted and KILLED and he could not have been more innocent.

For the murder of at least 3 Americans and at the very least manslaughter of the 16 year old boy, Obama is guilty of high crime.

The excuses that the left will give, and sadly many on the right, for not prosecuting Obama. Those targeted took up arms against the US. While this may or may not be true the way guilt in AMERICA is determined is through DUE PROCESS. Not by the whim of the President or the CIA, the same CIA that the left vilified for torture, but mostly they vilified Bush. I guess the left's reasoning is that it is OK to outright kill a person, and anyone innocent or not in the vicinity, but damn don't use enhanced interrogation techniques to try and save lives. The 5th amendment was meant for nothing else but to protect AMERICAN citizens against such actions by the government.

Another excuse that the left will give for the killing of the 16 year old is that he should have had a better father. How sick is that?

 

[billyerock1991]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Impeach Obama President of the United States of America

According to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, Section 1, "No Person except a "Natural Born Citizen", or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the signing of this Constitution, shall be eligible to hold the Office of President."

Whereas, The Second Session of the First Continental Congress, back in March of 1790, defined "Natural Born Citizen" to mean a child born of two parents who must both be American Citizens”;and

Whereas, The wording of the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” as established by our First Continental Congress in 1790 states:

"And the children of "citizens" of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens; Provided, that the
right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."

Whereas, Our Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the written will and authority of We the People; and

Whereas, We the People contend that Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, has failed to meet the requirement necessary to hold the office of President of the United States of America; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, failed to disclose his Indonesian citizenship and hid the fact that he had previously renounced his U.S. citizenship; and

Whereas, The law requires that such persons who want to regain their U.S. citizenship, upon reaching the age of 18, must go before the appropriate US State Department and apply for re-instatement of citizenship, and swear allegiance to the United States of America; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro failed to confirm his allegiance to the United States of America upon his 18th birthday as prescribed by law; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro was still using his Indonesian citizenship to gain entry into Pakistan in 1981; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, did not disclose his Indonesian citizenship, and has failed to affirm his allegiance to the United States of America and has withheld that from the American public; and

Whereas, The House and Senate has failed to act on this matter and abide by and honor the Constitution of the United States of America and failed to honor their pledge to defend our Constitution; and

Therefore, We the People demand that the House Judiciary Committee take immediate action to remove the usurper, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, from unlawfully and unconstitutionally holding the office of President of the United States of America.

Be it further resolved that, the House Judiciary Committee start an immediate investigation into Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro to determine his true citizenship, and this investigation be followed by removing said usurper Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, from the Office of President of the United States of America.

Impeach Obama President of the United States of America | Petition2Congress

and the nut case is loose again

 

[billyerock1991]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Multiple counts of Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, Human Trafficking, Jury Tampering, Criminal Conspiracy, Tax Evasion, Criminal Negligence, Misappropriation of Treasury Funds, etc,.

we're not talking abour republican charges here ... can you stick to the subject at hand

 

[NYcarbineer]

Discovery Institute - Discovery Institute fellow: EPA war on coal is unconstitutional

EPA
IRS
Benghazi
Fast N Furious
Illegal Immigration

Impeachment is a criminal indictment, not a court challenge over constitutionality issues.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Multiple counts of Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, Human Trafficking, Jury Tampering, Criminal Conspiracy, Tax Evasion, Criminal Negligence, Misappropriation of Treasury Funds, etc,.

Gee, and only yesterday impeachment was a Democratic plot dreamed up to raise money.

 

[zeke]

Discovery Institute - Discovery Institute fellow: EPA war on coal is unconstitutional

EPA
IRS
Benghazi
Fast N Furious
Illegal Immigration

Impeachment is a criminal indictment, not a court challenge over constitutionality issues.

Shhhh, the princess is still sleeping.......but when she gets here.........she's gonna show us all what an impeachment looks like.

And please don't confuse her with facts. That's a no no.

 

[zeke]

Obama and the CIA have created a death list that is well known.

That death list was used to target AMERICAN citizens, no matter how low some they were still AMERICANS and Obama had them killed without DUE PROCESS. Even the son of one of them was targeted and KILLED and he could not have been more innocent.

For the murder of at least 3 Americans and at the very least manslaughter of the 16 year old boy, Obama is guilty of high crime.

The excuses that the left will give, and sadly many on the right, for not prosecuting Obama. Those targeted took up arms against the US. While this may or may not be true the way guilt in AMERICA is determined is through DUE PROCESS. Not by the whim of the President or the CIA, the same CIA that the left vilified for torture, but mostly they vilified Bush. I guess the left's reasoning is that it is OK to outright kill a person, and anyone innocent or not in the vicinity, but damn don't use enhanced interrogation techniques to try and save lives. The 5th amendment was meant for nothing else but to protect AMERICAN citizens against such actions by the government.

Another excuse that the left will give for the killing of the 16 year old is that he should have had a better father. How sick is that?

By any chance are you old enough to remember when we had as President a guy named George Bush? He was President before Obama.

He and his Congress gave us the famous "Patriot Act" after 9/11. You should look it up, read it and see what, by law, the American police/military is able to do to ANY American citizen if it is determined that they are terrorists or associated with terrorists.

I was hating this legislation when it was proposed. And I hate it that Obama has utilized it and expanded it. But it was a Republican that gave it to us.

 

[billyerock1991]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

Impeach Obama President of the United States of America

According to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, Section 1, "No Person except a "Natural Born Citizen", or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the signing of this Constitution, shall be eligible to hold the Office of President."

Whereas, The Second Session of the First Continental Congress, back in March of 1790, defined "Natural Born Citizen" to mean a child born of two parents who must both be American Citizens”;and

Whereas, The wording of the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” as established by our First Continental Congress in 1790 states:

"And the children of "citizens" of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens; Provided, that the
right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."

Whereas, Our Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the written will and authority of We the People; and

Whereas, We the People contend that Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, has failed to meet the requirement necessary to hold the office of President of the United States of America; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, failed to disclose his Indonesian citizenship and hid the fact that he had previously renounced his U.S. citizenship; and

Whereas, The law requires that such persons who want to regain their U.S. citizenship, upon reaching the age of 18, must go before the appropriate US State Department and apply for re-instatement of citizenship, and swear allegiance to the United States of America; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro failed to confirm his allegiance to the United States of America upon his 18th birthday as prescribed by law; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro was still using his Indonesian citizenship to gain entry into Pakistan in 1981; and

Whereas, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, did not disclose his Indonesian citizenship, and has failed to affirm his allegiance to the United States of America and has withheld that from the American public; and

Whereas, The House and Senate has failed to act on this matter and abide by and honor the Constitution of the United States of America and failed to honor their pledge to defend our Constitution; and

Therefore, We the People demand that the House Judiciary Committee take immediate action to remove the usurper, Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, from unlawfully and unconstitutionally holding the office of President of the United States of America.

Be it further resolved that, the House Judiciary Committee start an immediate investigation into Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro to determine his true citizenship, and this investigation be followed by removing said usurper Mr. Barack H. Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, from the Office of President of the United States of America.

Impeach Obama President of the United States of America | Petition2Congress

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

now nut job... where does it state what a "naturalborn citizen" is ????where does it say that both parents have to be an american citizen??? It doesn't say that any where ... the term Natral born citizen was looked at in 2011 ... thecourt decided that it had no determination of what natural born citizen means at that time ... the supreme court refused to look at it ... so where did you get this bullshit about both parents having to be american citizen??? as far as the founding fathers were concerned was all you had to be is born in a state of this country ... Obama has shown where he was born you nut case ...

 

[Freewill]

Lived under an assumed name in another country for many years.

Has a Social Security number from a state he never lived.

Won't release most of his background information.

Editor of the Harvard Review but published almost if nothing during the time.

unilaterally changes laws.

Targets and kills American citizens without due process.

Blotched the Gulf Oil spill.

Made recess appointments while congress was NOT in recess.

But he will not be impeached, this is a very different time then it was when Nixon was impeached. The Republicans were the reason that Nixon was impeached not the Democrats. Just like today, no matter what the Republicans say if the Democrats can't see the lawlessness of this president, even to the point of killing a 16 year old AMERICAN, then Obama is safe.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Let's go about this rationally. What has Obama really done to warrant his impeachment from office?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution says:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

To the conservative Republicans, I am curious, other than talking points and rhetoric, or what has he really done to meet the criteria set forth in the Impeachment Clause? If all you have are talking points and rhetoric, you are only giving the other side more leverage. Let it be known that I am not defending nor endorsing Obama.

For the liberal Democrats, your answers would inevitably be that he has done 'nothing' to be impeached for. So I'm asking you to explain why in detail. No "Bush did this" or "Reagan did that." No trying to justify his actions by the actions of previous administrations. If you cannot explain why he hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment, be advised, you are giving the other side more leverage.

I just want honest explanations. That is it, that is all. My personal opinion on this subject is this:

While Obama has violated the Constitution on plenty of occasions (which is NOT the subject of this thread), he hasn't committed any 'high crimes or misdemeanors' what he has done is higher in severity than just petty crimes and must be settled among the courts. He has ignored the power of a duly elected congress, and has exceeded his power as sitting president. However, seeking his impeachment would be foolish. Impeaching him would create a political circus. If such an attempt were to succeed (which it won't for various reasons); it would be putting an even more incompetent leader in power. Joe Biden. Do you really want that? I wouldn't. Seeking his impeachment would only energize his base, and turn the tables on a promising election for Republicans this year. If you want to punish him, punish him at the polls. It's that easy.

You are finally agreeing with me on something, which means you're finally making sense.

Keep it up.