What has Dr. Susan Rice ever lied about - including Benghazi?

[Uncensored2008]

I would really like to know.

Why are you trying to protect this liar?

Professional courtesy?

 

[Reasonable]

This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.

 

[jknowgood]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

Here is what she said:

After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.

Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths

They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.

The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.

He was talking about 911, but nice try though.

 

[usmbguest5318]

I don't care who unmasked the names of individuals who had conversations with Russian actors. I care about what was the nature of the conversation(s) and whether it was appropriate and lawful. As it stands right now, we know:

• Several Trump-connected individuals had discussions with Russian, actors and those individuals denied having had any conversations with Russians.
• After those Trump-connected individuals denied having had any such conversations, someone -- I don't immediately care who it was -- revealed that in fact the claims about not having had any conversation were false.
• Several of the Russian actors with whom the conversations were had have been cited as being Russian intelligence assets.
• Once the Trump-connected individuals' attestations about the occurrence of conversations with Russian actors shown to be untrue, those individuals still have refrained from disclosing the complete details of those conversations.

Now that we know that the Trump-connected individuals did indeed have interactions with Russian, the Trump Administration's remarks have unwavering bid that we deal not with the "fox" skulking about the "chicken coop" looking for opportunity and making advances where/when possible, but rather the people sounded the alarm that the "fox" is and was there, unbeknownst to the "chickens" and their "owner," which in this case is the American people.

 

[The VOR]

I would really like to know.

Why are you trying to protect this liar?

What did she lie about? Facts? Proof?

You can catch a dog in the act of licking his nuts right in front guests in your home, but the dog will never understand what he did wrong. Susan Rice, who is already known to be a liar after Benghazi, lied her ass off today about not spying on Trump's campaign, and the whole world saw it.

There was some expert on the tube talking about her expressions and body language, he said she was lying

You just redefined stupid with that comment, lard ass. ROTFLMAO.

 

[Doc1]

You pukes have lost any right a all to demand "proof" about anything. Your bitches (Obama and Rice) got their dicks caught and they should go to jail

 

[Doc1]

I don't care who unmasked the names of individuals who had conversations with Russian actors. I care about what was the nature of the conversation(s) and whether it was appropriate and lawful. As it stands right now, we know:

• Several Trump-connected individuals had discussions with Russian, actors and those individuals denied having had any conversations with Russians.
• After those Trump-connected individuals denied having had any such conversations, someone -- I don't immediately care who it was -- revealed that in fact the claims about not having had any conversation were false.
• Several of the Russian actors with whom the conversations were had have been cited as being Russian intelligence assets.
• Once the Trump-connected individuals' attestations about the occurrence of conversations with Russian actors shown to be untrue, those individuals still have refrained from disclosing the complete details of those conversations.

Now that we know that the Trump-connected individuals did indeed have interactions with Russian, the Trump Administration's remarks have unwavering bid that we deal not with the "fox" skulking about the "chicken coop" looking for opportunity and making advances where/when possible, but rather the people sounded the alarm that the "fox" is and was there, unbeknownst to the "chickens" and their "owner," which in this case is the American people.

Whether you care about it or not is immaterial, the unmasking is a crime.

 

[OKTexas]

I would really like to know. Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual. Thank you.

The Attack And The Conservative "Blame Game" Response

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 1: The Rice Interviews

The Blame Game Continues

Hillary Clinton Takes Responsibility And Right-Wing Media Freak Out

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 2: The Debate

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 1: The CIA "Stand Down" Order

The Petraeus Conspiracy

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 3: Rice For SecState?

Hillary Clinton's Fake Concussion

Hillary Clinton's Testimony: Fake Anger, Tears

Secretary Panetta's Testimony

Hillary Clinton And The Politicized Congressional Report

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 2: Fox's Unnamed Source

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 4: The Talking Points Draft

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 3: The Benghazi "Whistleblowers"

The Incredible Shrinking Whistleblower Intimidation Claim

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 5: The Administration Emails

Special Prosecutor Versus Independent Investigators

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 6: The Obama Presser

Things Fall Apart

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 4: "Sources"

The Futile Call For A Benghazi Select Committee

The Fringe Valerie Jarrett Theory

As Benghazi Anniversary Approaches, Fox Goes Into Overdrive

Took a while to get your marching orders I see. Poor pathetic snowflake, still trying to rewrite history.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.

That might be the case.

What we KNOW is that Donald Trump is the president of the United States.

You might want to get over your butthurt and move on.

 

[Doc1]

This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.

Moron, you people have called us "Racist" for the last 8 years. Grow up.

 

[francoHFW]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

They do in Bengazi. And yes it was terror too, as was said immediately. And triggered by calls from the fundie Islamic Rush Limbaugh of Cairo/the Muslim world, like all the other attacks/protests that day, almost undoubtedly, dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.

Moron, you people have called us "Racist" for the last 8 years. Grow up.

Only 50-70% of you...clean up your act...AND he didn't call you that here lol...

 

[usmbguest5318]

I don't care who unmasked the names of individuals who had conversations with Russian actors. I care about what was the nature of the conversation(s) and whether it was appropriate and lawful. As it stands right now, we know:

• Several Trump-connected individuals had discussions with Russian, actors and those individuals denied having had any conversations with Russians.
• After those Trump-connected individuals denied having had any such conversations, someone -- I don't immediately care who it was -- revealed that in fact the claims about not having had any conversation were false.
• Several of the Russian actors with whom the conversations were had have been cited as being Russian intelligence assets.
• Once the Trump-connected individuals' attestations about the occurrence of conversations with Russian actors shown to be untrue, those individuals still have refrained from disclosing the complete details of those conversations.

Now that we know that the Trump-connected individuals did indeed have interactions with Russian, the Trump Administration's remarks have unwavering bid that we deal not with the "fox" skulking about the "chicken coop" looking for opportunity and making advances where/when possible, but rather the people sounded the alarm that the "fox" is and was there, unbeknownst to the "chickens" and their "owner," which in this case is the American people.

Whether you care about it or not is immaterial, the unmasking is a crime.

In and of itself, it is not. Even if unmasking were a crime, among the as yet unclearly explained series of events -- events about which the principals have been anything other than obfuscatory -- that may be criminal, who unmasked what data presents far less risk, most especially as whatever their motivations for it, personal pecuniary gain is quite likely not among them, whereas the same cannot be said of the principals involved in having what appear to have been unlawful discussions with Russian officials about U.S. policy.

 

[OKTexas]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

Here is what she said:

After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.

Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths

She lied, she was spoon fed the talking points from the WH.

 

[TheDude]

Lohota likes her because she's black. These are the people who judge others by their skin instead of the content of their character, provided they DEMOCRAT.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

They do in Bengazi. And yes it was terror too, as was said immediately. And triggered by calls from the fundie Islamic Rush Limbaugh of Cairo/the Muslim world, like all the other attacks/protests that day, almost undoubtedly, dupe.

It wasn't over a video, fool

 

[Rocko]

I would really like to know. Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual. Thank you.

The Attack And The Conservative "Blame Game" Response

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 1: The Rice Interviews

The Blame Game Continues

Hillary Clinton Takes Responsibility And Right-Wing Media Freak Out

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 2: The Debate

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 1: The CIA "Stand Down" Order

The Petraeus Conspiracy

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 3: Rice For SecState?

Hillary Clinton's Fake Concussion

Hillary Clinton's Testimony: Fake Anger, Tears

Secretary Panetta's Testimony

Hillary Clinton And The Politicized Congressional Report

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 2: Fox's Unnamed Source

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 4: The Talking Points Draft

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 3: The Benghazi "Whistleblowers"

The Incredible Shrinking Whistleblower Intimidation Claim

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 5: The Administration Emails

Special Prosecutor Versus Independent Investigators

Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 6: The Obama Presser

Things Fall Apart

Obama Left Them To Die, Part 4: "Sources"

The Futile Call For A Benghazi Select Committee

The Fringe Valerie Jarrett Theory

As Benghazi Anniversary Approaches, Fox Goes Into Overdrive

1) Benghazi was about a video
2) bo bergdahl served with honor and distinction.
3) I didn't know anything about unmasking

I hope that helps.

 

[Rocko]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

Here is what she said:

After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.

Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths

They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.

The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.

No he didn't. Nice red herring though.

 

[francoHFW]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

Here is what she said:

After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.

Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths

She lied, she was spoon fed the talking points from the WH.

RW BS propaganda. It was a close to spontaneous terror attack triggered by calls for protests of the video, almost undoubtedly. As Dems said all along, after some early confusion about a protest in Bengazi. Fox said the same at first, before they got their marching orders.

 

[francoHFW]

She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.

We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs

Here is what she said:

After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.

Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths

They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.

The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.

No he didn't. Nice red herring though.

He said we wouldn't be coerced by terror. Same gd thing.