Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
I would really like to know.
Why are you trying to protect this liar?
Professional courtesy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would really like to know.
Why are you trying to protect this liar?
He was talking about 911, but nice try though.They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Here is what she said:
After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.
Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths
The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.
You just redefined stupid with that comment, lard ass. ROTFLMAO.You can catch a dog in the act of licking his nuts right in front guests in your home, but the dog will never understand what he did wrong. Susan Rice, who is already known to be a liar after Benghazi, lied her ass off today about not spying on Trump's campaign, and the whole world saw it.I would really like to know.
Why are you trying to protect this liar?
What did she lie about? Facts? Proof?
There was some expert on the tube talking about her expressions and body language, he said she was lying
I don't care who unmasked the names of individuals who had conversations with Russian actors. I care about what was the nature of the conversation(s) and whether it was appropriate and lawful. As it stands right now, we know:
Now that we know that the Trump-connected individuals did indeed have interactions with Russian, the Trump Administration's remarks have unwavering bid that we deal not with the "fox" skulking about the "chicken coop" looking for opportunity and making advances where/when possible, but rather the people sounded the alarm that the "fox" is and was there, unbeknownst to the "chickens" and their "owner," which in this case is the American people.
- Several Trump-connected individuals had discussions with Russian, actors and those individuals denied having had any conversations with Russians.
- After those Trump-connected individuals denied having had any such conversations, someone -- I don't immediately care who it was -- revealed that in fact the claims about not having had any conversation were false.
- Several of the Russian actors with whom the conversations were had have been cited as being Russian intelligence assets.
- Once the Trump-connected individuals' attestations about the occurrence of conversations with Russian actors shown to be untrue, those individuals still have refrained from disclosing the complete details of those conversations.
I would really like to know. Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual. Thank you.
The Attack And The Conservative "Blame Game" Response
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 1: The Rice Interviews
The Blame Game Continues
Hillary Clinton Takes Responsibility And Right-Wing Media Freak Out
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 2: The Debate
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 1: The CIA "Stand Down" Order
The Petraeus Conspiracy
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 3: Rice For SecState?
Hillary Clinton's Fake Concussion
Hillary Clinton's Testimony: Fake Anger, Tears
Secretary Panetta's Testimony
Hillary Clinton And The Politicized Congressional Report
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 2: Fox's Unnamed Source
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 4: The Talking Points Draft
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 3: The Benghazi "Whistleblowers"
The Incredible Shrinking Whistleblower Intimidation Claim
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 5: The Administration Emails
Special Prosecutor Versus Independent Investigators
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 6: The Obama Presser
Things Fall Apart
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 4: "Sources"
The Futile Call For A Benghazi Select Committee
The Fringe Valerie Jarrett Theory
As Benghazi Anniversary Approaches, Fox Goes Into Overdrive
This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.
This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.
They do in Bengazi. And yes it was terror too, as was said immediately. And triggered by calls from the fundie Islamic Rush Limbaugh of Cairo/the Muslim world, like all the other attacks/protests that day, almost undoubtedly, dupe.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Only 50-70% of you...clean up your act...AND he didn't call you that here lol...This is getting real old. Anyone who speaks the truth about the orange clown is automatically criticized and called names by the DEPLORABLES.
They know their role and it's to act as childish and ignorant as their fearful leader.
Moron, you people have called us "Racist" for the last 8 years. Grow up.
I don't care who unmasked the names of individuals who had conversations with Russian actors. I care about what was the nature of the conversation(s) and whether it was appropriate and lawful. As it stands right now, we know:
Now that we know that the Trump-connected individuals did indeed have interactions with Russian, the Trump Administration's remarks have unwavering bid that we deal not with the "fox" skulking about the "chicken coop" looking for opportunity and making advances where/when possible, but rather the people sounded the alarm that the "fox" is and was there, unbeknownst to the "chickens" and their "owner," which in this case is the American people.
- Several Trump-connected individuals had discussions with Russian, actors and those individuals denied having had any conversations with Russians.
- After those Trump-connected individuals denied having had any such conversations, someone -- I don't immediately care who it was -- revealed that in fact the claims about not having had any conversation were false.
- Several of the Russian actors with whom the conversations were had have been cited as being Russian intelligence assets.
- Once the Trump-connected individuals' attestations about the occurrence of conversations with Russian actors shown to be untrue, those individuals still have refrained from disclosing the complete details of those conversations.
Whether you care about it or not is immaterial, the unmasking is a crime.
She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Here is what she said:
After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.
Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths
They do in Bengazi. And yes it was terror too, as was said immediately. And triggered by calls from the fundie Islamic Rush Limbaugh of Cairo/the Muslim world, like all the other attacks/protests that day, almost undoubtedly, dupe.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
I would really like to know. Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual. Thank you.
The Attack And The Conservative "Blame Game" Response
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 1: The Rice Interviews
The Blame Game Continues
Hillary Clinton Takes Responsibility And Right-Wing Media Freak Out
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 2: The Debate
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 1: The CIA "Stand Down" Order
The Petraeus Conspiracy
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 3: Rice For SecState?
Hillary Clinton's Fake Concussion
Hillary Clinton's Testimony: Fake Anger, Tears
Secretary Panetta's Testimony
Hillary Clinton And The Politicized Congressional Report
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 2: Fox's Unnamed Source
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 4: The Talking Points Draft
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 3: The Benghazi "Whistleblowers"
The Incredible Shrinking Whistleblower Intimidation Claim
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 5: The Administration Emails
Special Prosecutor Versus Independent Investigators
Calling Benghazi "Terror," Part 6: The Obama Presser
Things Fall Apart
Obama Left Them To Die, Part 4: "Sources"
The Futile Call For A Benghazi Select Committee
The Fringe Valerie Jarrett Theory
As Benghazi Anniversary Approaches, Fox Goes Into Overdrive
They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Here is what she said:
After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.
Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths
The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.
RW BS propaganda. It was a close to spontaneous terror attack triggered by calls for protests of the video, almost undoubtedly. As Dems said all along, after some early confusion about a protest in Bengazi. Fox said the same at first, before they got their marching orders.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Here is what she said:
After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.
Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths
She lied, she was spoon fed the talking points from the WH.
He said we wouldn't be coerced by terror. Same gd thing.They knew it was an terror attack from the beginning, and she still lied about it.She said the Benghazi attack was spontaneous due to a video.
We know that is not true. Spontaneous attacks do not include the use of RPGs
Here is what she said:
After U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice appeared on the Sunday political talk shows on September 16 to discuss Benghazi, the Obama administration came under fire for not calling the attack a planned act of "terrorism," and for engaging in a politically motivated "cover-up." But Rice made clear during her appearances that her comments were based on "our current best assessment" that the Libya attack was not premeditated, acknowledged that the perpetrators were "extremists," and said that future investigations and analyses by intelligence services "will tell us with certainty what transpired." It would later be revealed that her suggestion that the attack was linked to an anti-Islam video that had embroiled the Middle East came from talking points generated by the CIA.
Explainer: A Year Of Benghazi Myths
The President called it a terrorist attack the day after it happened.
No he didn't. Nice red herring though.