What happens when your leader is a prolific liar

[bripat9643]

Was that the only source you listed?

And, yeah, the BBB is anything but a market oriented organization.

the links are right there dummy.

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.

Behind that ‘four stars’ rating for the Clinton Foundation from Charity Navigator​

Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
​

If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​

Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down

The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check

Only brain dead douchebags like you trust the source you're using.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media is fake news

 

[bripat9643]

Do you really want to go into this? If so, we should talk about the clinton foundation where 90% of contributions went for salaries and expenses (the clinton bank accounts) and only 10% to the needy.





5

fake news.

At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Clinton Foundation

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

 

[Redfish]

OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us

"if you like your plan you can keep it"
"we landed under sniper fire"
"I never had classified data on my private server"
"she didn't intend to violate federal law"
"My son was not involved in Ukrainian corruption"

are those some of the Trump lies you keep talking about?

I kept my plan.....so did over 98 percent of Americans
Hillary landed in a known sniper zone.....Trump lied about bone spurs
Hillary had no classified information. It was reclassified later
No evidence of Hunter Biden involved in corruption


Trump is Impeached

I win

not even close, you lost like you do on every thread. you lose because you parrot bullshit.

Obozocare was the worst piece of legislation ever passed by congress. It forced people to buy coverage that they did not need or want and then fined them if they refused to buy the crappy coverage.


there was no sniper fire when she landed, she lied

the classified data on her server was declassified after the fact to protect her crooked ass

then exactly what was Burisma paying him 80K a month to do? It was buying influence, i.e. bribery, then crazy uncle Joe bragged about it.

the impeachment charade in the dem house will go down in history as the most partisan unsupported attempted coup in our nation's history. The dems will lose the house this november because of it.

 

[Redfish]

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

“Some”

LOL

yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.

then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.

How exactly did they run her out of the race?

Do you know why Gabbard isn’t terribly well regarded by the party?

by using their media cronies to slam her, by skewing the polls to keep her out of the debates.

why don't the dems like her? because she is a military veteran who supports the constitution and respects our flag.

 

[colfax_m]

“Some”

LOL

yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.

then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.

How exactly did they run her out of the race?

Do you know why Gabbard isn’t terribly well regarded by the party?

by using their media cronies to slam her, by skewing the polls to keep her out of the debates.

why don't the dems like her? because she is a military veteran who supports the constitution and respects our flag.

Skewing polls? Evidence of your accusation or did you just make that up?

Democrats have problems with her stance on Syria. They don’t really like monsters like Assad. Gabbard doesn’t seem to have the same issues with people who launch chemical weapons on their own citizens.

 

[Redfish]

yeah, that's funny isn't it? I thought all liberals had to think the same or be banned from the liberal club.

that's the rw whackadoodle creed.

then why did the dems run Tulsi out of the race? she refused to parrot the party line, so she was kicked out.

How exactly did they run her out of the race?

Do you know why Gabbard isn’t terribly well regarded by the party?

by using their media cronies to slam her, by skewing the polls to keep her out of the debates.

why don't the dems like her? because she is a military veteran who supports the constitution and respects our flag.

Skewing polls? Evidence of your accusation or did you just make that up?

Democrats have problems with her stance on Syria. They don’t really like monsters like Assad. Gabbard doesn’t seem to have the same issues with people who launch chemical weapons on their own citizens.

today's polls are not designed to reflect public opinion, they are designed to influence it. Most of the dems of today are war mongers so they hate anyone who wants to eliminate wars and bring our kids home----------people like Tulsi and Trump.

We cannot police the entire world. Let the idiots eliminate each other, they have been trying to do that for 3000 years.

Assad will be removed by the people of Syria, just as the Ayatollah will be removed by the people of Iran. Its none of our fricken business unless they attack or kill americans. If they do that we should hit them 100 times as hard, both Tulsi and Trump agree on that.

 

[playtime]

OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us

"I play to people's fantasies," he writes. "People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That's why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular." ~ donald trump * art of the deal

Fact Checker
Analysis
President Trump has made 15,413 false or misleading claims over 1,055 daysBy
Glenn Kessler,
Salvador Rizzo and
Meg Kelly
December 16, 2019 at 6:52 AM EST

In 2017, President Trump made nearly 1,999 false or misleading claims. In 2018, he added another 5,689, for a total of 7,688.

Now, with a few weeks still left in 2019, the president already has more than doubled the total number of false or misleading claims in just a single year.

As of Dec. 10, his 1,055th day in office, Trump had made 15,413 false or misleading claims, according to the Fact Checker’s database that analyzes, categorizes and tracks every suspect statement he has uttered. That’s an average of more than 32 claims a day since our last update 62 days ago.

& that's not counting the lies surrounding the assassination of the general.


* impeached.

 

[playtime]

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.

Behind that ‘four stars’ rating for the Clinton Foundation from Charity Navigator​

Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
​

If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​

Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down

The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check

The only place Finger Boy gets information

Another DemTard drops out of the race.

creepy porn star porker

 

[playtime]

the links are right there dummy.

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.

Behind that ‘four stars’ rating for the Clinton Foundation from Charity Navigator​

Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
​

If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​

Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down

The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check

Only brain dead douchebags like you trust the source you're using.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media is fake news

i know exactly what they are & the standards they follow & they hold up. go & see their lists as to who is left or right leaning & most you will see in the biases. but your CONspiracy sites are listed exactly what they are & you can't accept that cause you are a nutter.

 

[playtime]

fake news.

At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Clinton Foundation

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

prove it.

 

[bripat9643]

The Charity Navigator rating was bought and paid for.

Behind that ‘four stars’ rating for the Clinton Foundation from Charity Navigator​

Why do so many fail to notice the long string of people and organizations that end up ruined, their reputations in tatters, after playing along with various Clinton schemes? Ask Webb Hubbell, once the highest of high flyers, mayor of Little Rock, chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court, and head of the second largest law firm in the state. He ended up a convicted felon.

Democrats defending the Clinton Foundation have seized on the four-star rating conferred on the Clinton Foundation by nonprofit rating group Charity Navigator. But that rating is shocking, compromised by the revelation that Charity Navigator has a record of accepting favors from the very powerful, very well connected Clinton Foundation. Mark Tapscott reports for the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A non-profit group that has received favors from the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), including a free membership that entitled its officials to rub elbows with world leaders, issued its top rating Thursday for the Clinton Foundation.

Charity Navigator awarded the Clinton Foundation four-stars based on an rating algorithm that scored the controversial non-profit with a 97.5 on financial issues and 93 on accountability and transparency. The new rating represented a boost for the foundation, as Charity Navigator had previously put it on its watch list due to concerns about its finances and transparency.

But the four-star rating had hardly been announced before the Associated Press reported that Charity Navigator was a member of the CGI from 2012 to 2014. The CGI is one of the Clinton Foundation’s best-known programs, as it regularly convenes glittering gatherings of celebrities, government officials and philanthropic stars.

The $20,000 CGI membership fee was waived for Charity Navigator, which reported it as an in-kind contribution, according to the AP. The news organization said Charity Navigator chairman Michael Thatcher claimed his group joined CGI “to mingle with world leaders and promote its ratings.”

Various sorts of people are willing to pay millions of dollars for the opportunity to mingle with the high and mighty assembled by the CGI or CF. To be on the freceiving end of such favors is an inherent conflict of interest.
​

If Charity Navigator wants to survive and retain credibility, it needs to withdraw this rating.

If the Clinton Foundation has been audited, it is news to me, and to Google, too.​

Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down

The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check

Only brain dead douchebags like you trust the source you're using.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media is fake news

i know exactly what they are & the standards they follow & they hold up. go & see their lists as to who is left or right leaning & most you will see in the biases. but your CONspiracy sites are listed exactly what they are & you can't accept that cause you are a nutter.

Their only standard is that a leftwing source us always correct and a rightwing source is always incorrect. They are just another fake news source.

 

[bripat9643]

At the Clinton Foundation, Access Equals Corruption - Rasmussen Reports®

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Clinton Foundation

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

prove it.

I already linked to the story that shows they were given a free membership, which normally costs $20,000, to the Clinton Foundation. They attended Clinton Foundation events where they got to mingle with Hollywood elites and important politicians.

 

[playtime]

Clinton Foundation is above refute
Charity Navigator is reporting what everyone already knows. All you can do is lodge baseless complaints

If there is anything questionable about Clinton Foundation practices, Republicans would have shut them down

The Clinton Foundation bought it's high rating from Charity Navigator. Prior to 2012, charity navigator had nothing good to say about the Clinton Foundation.

Wall Street analyst uncovers Clinton Foundation fraud - WND

for fuck's sake

World Net Daily (WND)
Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
World Net Daily (WND) - Media Bias/Fact Check

Only brain dead douchebags like you trust the source you're using.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media is fake news

i know exactly what they are & the standards they follow & they hold up. go & see their lists as to who is left or right leaning & most you will see in the biases. but your CONspiracy sites are listed exactly what they are & you can't accept that cause you are a nutter.

Their only standard is that a leftwing source us always correct and a rightwing source is always incorrect. They are just another fake news source.

you are fake news & are simply outa gas.

Changes/Corrections - Media Bias/Fact Check

 

[playtime]

rasmussen is biased...

& these organizations aren't.

Charity Navigator - Rating for Clinton Foundation

Clinton Foundation

Charity Report - Clinton Foundation - give.org

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

prove it.

I already linked to the story that shows they were given a free membership, which normally costs $20,000, to the Clinton Foundation. They attended Clinton Foundation events where they got to mingle with Hollywood elites and important politicians.

all you do is link CONspiracy alternative facts. we are done here. better luck next time.

 

[bripat9643]

Why Some Liberals Say It's Time to Shut Down the Clinton Foundation | The Takeaway | WNYC Studios

and now, the rest of the story

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

prove it.

I already linked to the story that shows they were given a free membership, which normally costs $20,000, to the Clinton Foundation. They attended Clinton Foundation events where they got to mingle with Hollywood elites and important politicians.

all you do is link CONspiracy alternative facts. we are done here. better luck next time.

Thanks for your concession.

 

[playtime]

oh, so some 'liberals opinions' going back before the election carries more weight here than an independent audit dated nov 2019 ?

bless yer little fishy heart.

"Independent" my ass. They are members of the Clinton Foundation, dumbass.

prove it.

I already linked to the story that shows they were given a free membership, which normally costs $20,000, to the Clinton Foundation. They attended Clinton Foundation events where they got to mingle with Hollywood elites and important politicians.

all you do is link CONspiracy alternative facts. we are done here. better luck next time.

Thanks for your concession.

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that's the ticket ... you lost. did you see all them thar correction NOT benefitting the 'left'. tis there & even in front of yer eyes, you'll come up with something just as ridiculous as anything else you have said.

it's not CONcession - i am bored with you.

 

[rightwinger]

OK

Enough diversion of the thread. Back to the damage of having a prolific liar as President.

Trump cannot be relied on to be honest with the people he serves. He treats us like children who believe any fantasy he tells us

"if you like your plan you can keep it"
"we landed under sniper fire"
"I never had classified data on my private server"
"she didn't intend to violate federal law"
"My son was not involved in Ukrainian corruption"

are those some of the Trump lies you keep talking about?

I kept my plan.....so did over 98 percent of Americans
Hillary landed in a known sniper zone.....Trump lied about bone spurs
Hillary had no classified information. It was reclassified later
No evidence of Hunter Biden involved in corruption


Trump is Impeached

I win

not even close, you lost like you do on every thread. you lose because you parrot bullshit.

Obozocare was the worst piece of legislation ever passed by congress. It forced people to buy coverage that they did not need or want and then fined them if they refused to buy the crappy coverage.


there was no sniper fire when she landed, she lied

the classified data on her server was declassified after the fact to protect her crooked ass

then exactly what was Burisma paying him 80K a month to do? It was buying influence, i.e. bribery, then crazy uncle Joe bragged about it.

the impeachment charade in the dem house will go down in history as the most partisan unsupported attempted coup in our nation's history. The dems will lose the house this november because of it.

Obamacare was the best Nationwide healthcare plan our country has ever seen

Name a better one

 

[lennypartiv]

Obamacare was the best Nationwide healthcare plan our country has ever seen
Name a better one

What we had before ObamaCare was better than ObamaCare.

 

[playtime]

Obamacare was the best Nationwide healthcare plan our country has ever seen
Name a better one

What we had before ObamaCare was better than ObamaCare.

really, how?

bankruptcy?
foreclosures?
higher premiums for pre existing conditions?
being denied insurance altogether because of having a pre existing condition?
no mandated coverage for yearly physicals? or
mammograms? or
colonoscopies? or
maternity care?
having annuals caps?
having lifetime caps?

you are such a dolt.

 

[charwin95]

And what did that get us?
Did it bring about peace?

When one is negotiating with the enemy, you want them scared shitless of what you might do next.

Iran does not seem to fear Trump
They have restarted their nuclear program

They never stopped their nuclear program, moron.

Yes they did. If they didn’t your evidence is where and what?

Where's your evidence that they stopped it?

From the atomic energy commission that are doing the inspection.

Where’s your proof of the violations aside coming from a moron.