the provincial Court of Appeal
The problem initially started when the girl was just 13 years old and wanted to undergo puberty blocker hormonal treatment.
In 2020, the appeals court clinched the case, arguing that the father’s actions had caused the young woman “significant pain”, for which they ordered him to address her according to the gender she identified with and prohibited him from sharing his frustration via the media.
Or was your challenge to name every possible circumstance in which someone other than a parent should determine the best interests of the child?
Simple: When the parents are breaking specific laws regarding threatment of their children, the courts should step in.
Let a legislature stand up and say, "we want to make it against the law for a parent to disagree with 'gender affirming care' for their child, and make it a crime for them to say so."