What gender affirming care is schools providing without parental consent?

Lots of accusations of schools providing gender affirming care without parental consent. Politicians have even claimed a child may go to school and return home that afternoon as a different gender and without parents' consent. Obviously, that claim is absurd, yet those claims are still prominent among many right leaning people. Many estimates say that as many as 60% of children considering gender reassignment have considered or attempted suicide. Counseling has been shown to reduce those numbers greatly. Are there any believable claims of schools doing anything other than counseling at risk students?View attachment 1044402
You've got a point. Transgender care for minors shouldn't happen, even with parental consent because there are way too many lefty loon parents out there who would gladly mutilate their own children in the name of wokeness.
 
Start with Sam Roy.

A public school worker at Great Salt Bay Community School who coached a 13-year-old girl into a gender transition without telling her parents...




sam-roy.png
 
Lots of accusations of schools providing gender affirming care without parental consent. Politicians have even claimed a child may go to school and return home that afternoon as a different gender and without parents' consent. Obviously, that claim is absurd, yet those claims are still prominent among many right leaning people. Many estimates say that as many as 60% of children considering gender reassignment have considered or attempted suicide. Counseling has been shown to reduce those numbers greatly. Are there any believable claims of schools doing anything other than counseling at risk students?View attachment 1044402
 
The demented LEFT are so deranged and know that normal grown-up people won't accept their BULLSHIT, so they prey on the CHILDREN.
These SICK FUCKS need to be ELIMINATED from any position of power over the young and vulnerable, at the very least.
These FREAKS belong in insane asylums!!!!!
 
Allegations without evidence are just unproven statements.
Start with Sam Roy.

A public school worker at Great Salt Bay Community School who coached a 13-year-old girl into a gender transition without telling her parents...





Sanctuary states legislated to keep parents in the dark.

They'll send their kids to school never realizing those mental health counselors (they are NOT teachers) who claim to be diagnosing gender dysphoria , are actually there to sell it, and do so to the pre-pubescents.

The damage done to children is phenomenal , life altering , and not always reversible

But so many (et all woke jokes) want to simply paint it an allegation, when evidence abounds....
1732194146103.webp



~S~
 
Start with Sam Roy.

A public school worker at Great Salt Bay Community School who coached a 13-year-old girl into a gender transition without telling her parents...




sam-roy.png
So we are to fooled by the exceptiion to the norm.
 
All of the above means that we have killers that may be male or female or something in our midst.
 
You've got a point. Transgender care for minors shouldn't happen, even with parental consent because there are way too many lefty loon parents out there who would gladly mutilate their own children in the name of wokeness.
Yet right wingers specifically target schools that are only following applicable law. Exactly where is your cut off point when denying parents the right to make decisions for their children?
 
the provincial Court of Appeal
and under what circumstances
The problem initially started when the girl was just 13 years old and wanted to undergo puberty blocker hormonal treatment.
should they be able to determine what is in the best interest of the child?
In 2020, the appeals court clinched the case, arguing that the father’s actions had caused the young woman “significant pain”, for which they ordered him to address her according to the gender she identified with and prohibited him from sharing his frustration via the media.

Or was your challenge to name every possible circumstance in which someone other than a parent should determine the best interests of the child?

Simple: When the parents are breaking specific laws regarding threatment of their children, the courts should step in.

Let a legislature stand up and say, "we want to make it against the law for a parent to disagree with 'gender affirming care' for their child, and make it a crime for them to say so."
 
the provincial Court of Appeal

The problem initially started when the girl was just 13 years old and wanted to undergo puberty blocker hormonal treatment.

In 2020, the appeals court clinched the case, arguing that the father’s actions had caused the young woman “significant pain”, for which they ordered him to address her according to the gender she identified with and prohibited him from sharing his frustration via the media.


Or was your challenge to name every possible circumstance in which someone other than a parent should determine the best interests of the child?

Simple: When the parents are breaking specific laws regarding threatment of their children, the courts should step in.

Let a legislature stand up and say, "we want to make it against the law for a parent to disagree with 'gender affirming care' for their child, and make it a crime for them to say so."
WOW, every day that goes by, I learn the UK has more real lousy laws.
 
No child mutilation on minors, even with parental consent.
What is your all-inclusive definition of mutilation? We know you oppose sex change. What else do you think constitutes mutilation?
 
the provincial Court of Appeal

The problem initially started when the girl was just 13 years old and wanted to undergo puberty blocker hormonal treatment.

In 2020, the appeals court clinched the case, arguing that the father’s actions had caused the young woman “significant pain”, for which they ordered him to address her according to the gender she identified with and prohibited him from sharing his frustration via the media.


Or was your challenge to name every possible circumstance in which someone other than a parent should determine the best interests of the child?

Simple: When the parents are breaking specific laws regarding threatment of their children, the courts should step in.

Let a legislature stand up and say, "we want to make it against the law for a parent to disagree with 'gender affirming care' for their child, and make it a crime for them to say so."
The legislature hasn't done that, and the court made that decision. Your only hope is for sex change to be outlawed. Good luck with that.
 
What is your all-inclusive definition of mutilation? We know you oppose sex change. What else do you think constitutes mutilation?
This thread is about "gender affirming" care. Now you are trying to spin it into something else.
 
You equated gender affirming care with mutilation. Define mutilation. Answer the question.
We all know you are for mutilation of young children. That's why your side lost everything. You are for trannies, Trump is for Americans. In 2028 Trump will be running for a third term, Make America Male/Female Again.
 
Back
Top Bottom