What dramatic sea level rise could do

[EMH]

Same as "Osama" in Saudi, when pressed, the Zionist Fascist cannot produce a SINGLE PHOTO of a landmark sinking...

 

[Crick]

Same as "Osama" in Saudi, when pressed, the Zionist Fascist cannot produce a SINGLE PHOTO of a landmark sinking...

"Hahahahaaa ohhhh... you silly hologram!

 

[EMH]

View attachment 779470
"Hahahahaaa ohhhh... you silly hologram!

LOL!!!


Thanks for making my points for me....



Your side claims all this "melting" and "ocean rise" and cannot produce ONE SINGLE PHOTO to back it up...

 

[Crick]

LOL!!!


Thanks for making my points for me....



Your side claims all this "melting" and "ocean rise" and cannot produce ONE SINGLE PHOTO to back it up...

Yeah, that's how they do it. Photographs.

 

[jc456]

Published, peer-reviewed studies aren't crying wolf. No scientist has ever predicted your children would be dead by now from global warming.

only politicians who claim they were told by scientists. hmmmmmmmm did they lie?

 

[jc456]

LOL!!!


Thanks for making my points for me....



Your side claims all this "melting" and "ocean rise" and cannot produce ONE SINGLE PHOTO to back it up...

Frank had the best one of the Statue of Liberty photo earlier in the thread. hilarious. 1898 to 2017.

 

[jc456]

The study found that a rapid pulse of sea level rise had taken place and that this produced a lack of oxygen and a rise in hydrogen sulfide that could have been the kill mechanism. The extinction acted almost specifically on bottom feeders. Pelagic marines species and land plants were almost completely unaffected.

then why do we have seas full of creatures?

 

[jc456]

Yeah, that's how they do it. Photographs.

well fine, provide data.

 

[Crick]

only politicians who claim they were told by scientists. hmmmmmmmm did they lie?

I suspect you can find some idiot somewhere saying anything you'd like to claim they said. There is a clear and obvious reason you don't argue the science you fucking waste of air.

 

[jc456]

I suspect you can find some idiot somewhere saying anything you'd like to claim they said. There is a clear and obvious reason you don't argue the science your fucking waste of air.

Al Gore. I agree, what a fking idiot. The world lost their nut to that dude. Glad you see he's a fool.

You still incorporate his message in here. odd.

 

[Crick]

Al Gore. I agree, what a fking idiot. The world lost their nut to that dude. Glad you see he's a fool.

You still incorporate his message in here. odd.

After EMH, you hold the ranking fool title here.

 

[jc456]

After EMH, you hold the ranking fool title here.

I know you can't answer basic questions. I prove your nonsense daily in here. You still haven't backed up one of your statements to date. you're welcome.

I will continue to expose your nonsense too.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Geologists examining shale deposits have determined the likely kill mechanism in several mass extinction events: a loss of oxygen and simultaneous build up of hydrogen sulfide. A rapid rise in sea level from Greenland and/or Antarctic ice sheet destabilization could produce similar conditions.

Geologists Discover a Critical Kill Mechanism Behind a 350 Million-Year-Old Series of Extinctions

A major oil source in North America reveals insights into one of the planet's most devastating mass extinctions. The Bakken Shale Formation, spanning an area of 200,000 square miles (520,000 square kilometers) beneath parts of Canada and North Dakota, has been a prolific source of oil and natural

scitechdaily.com

We're doomed:

 

[jc456]

We're doomed:

Don't you know those don't prove the sea level didn't rise, the water avoided them all and went right to the depth recorders.

 

[Crick]

We're doomed:

Actually, if the Devonian process were to take place, it would kill off benthic, littoral organisms (bottom-dwellers living on the Continental Shelf). We would not be directly affected. We would be indirectly affected by the loss of marine food resources. No more clams and oysters and a very stinky beachfront.

 

[jc456]

Actually, if the Devonian process were to take place, it would kill off benthic, littoral organisms (bottom-dwellers living on the Continental Shelf). We would not be directly affected. We would be indirectly affected by the loss of marine food resources. No more clams and oysters and a very stinky beachfront.

if a big old meteor hit we'd be in big trouble too, right?

 

[jc456]

if a big old meteor hit we'd be in big trouble too, right?

BTW, more evidence that old crick is about the sky falling farm.

 

[Crick]

BTW, more evidence that old crick is about the sky falling farm.

You're replying to yourself because you think that produces more evidence?

 

[jc456]

You're replying to yourself because you think that produces more evidence?

the things that bother you is truly hilarious.

 

[Crick]

the things that bother you is truly hilarious.

"Things" is plural, "is" is singlular. You need to make those agree. You should have learned that in the 3rd grade.

The reason I started this thread is that ever since I heard the WAIS was unstable, I have been concerned that a catastrophic collapse was possible. Mainstream science doesn't like to go with the outliers. They say that it will take centuries for the WAIS to come apart. But my experience is that predictions of failure are almost always too optimistic. A catastrophic collapse would set up precisely the scenario the OP's linked study examines. But, hey, its just my unqualified opinion.