By "real media" you mean MSNBC?
What does the Trump tape really mean to the average American man?
- Thread starter Old Rocks
- Start date
TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #162
Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'
That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.
In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.
Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.
owebo
Gold Member
The best part about the NYT is that Trump will build a wall with Mexico...Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'
That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.
In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.
Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.
Plenty of accusations but no proof, no evidence, but you don't seem to want to acknowledge that several of them have been proven false. The witness on the plane, the one who supposedly watched in horror, said Trump never touched her and that she saying she couldn't believe she got to meet Donald Trump. Also confirmed the seats were not designed the way the accuser claimed.
Dale Smith
Platinum Member
Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'
That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.
In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.
Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.
What a compolete load of horseshit.....seriously, that was lamer than watching a cat trying to bury it's shit on a frozen sidewalk...sans of any proof whatsoever. Bill "drop trou" and his sexcapdaes go back to his days in Arkansas including those willing and not so willing...then we have his pedophilia peccadilloes with Jeffrey Epstein that got off light because he had the goods on those that had partaken of the underage girls and boys he provided for the power elite.
Stupid fucks like you believe that they have the right to do any fucking thing they want.
Last edited:
Please stop altering my posts.Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'
That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.
In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.
Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.
owebo
Gold Member
It's what fascists do....I don't consider them human....Please stop altering my posts.Exactly why Trump's libel lawsuit would leave him a 'major loser'
That the Republican nominee for president has boasted about sexually assaulting women, and that numerous women have come forward with detailed and credible claims showing that his boasts were not just locker room brags, not only is newsworthy but of immediate and significant national interest.
In his campaign against the Times, Trump will lose. In his campaign against Hillary Clinton, whether Trump will win or lose will be up to the voters in our republic, informed by a free press protected by a First Amendment that empowers all of us — journalists and lay citizens alike — to hold public figures like Donald Trump to account.
Varona is professor of law and academic dean at American University Washington College of Law, where he teaches and writes in media law, among other subjects. He has practiced communications law at Skadden Arps and Mintz Levin, as well as at the Federal Communications Commission.
Boss
Take a Memo:
What part of PUBLIC do you not understand?You know damn good and well I'm talking about a PUBLIC condemnation of the super pac. There's nothing illegal about doing that and you know it. You've been kicked out of the closet and the best you can come up with is "But, but he would go to jail if he condemned the super pac's tactics". Total BULLSHIT and everyone knows it. It doesn't get more pathetic than that.Now I think I've heard everything.
Laugh like a jackass all you like, it's a violation of federal law for any candidate to correspond with any PAC during a political campaign. You can go to prison for up to 2 years and people have. So no, Cruz could NOT have "asked them to not do it" and he is not obligated to police all the assorted PACs to ensure they follow his standards.
It's pitiful how I have reduced you to such a drooling little retard.
Again... it's not Cruz's responsibility to run around monitoring what any PAC does... condemning it, approving it or whatever. He can't legally tell them what to do or even correspond with them. Do you not know the law?
Go educate yourself, it's called McCain-Feingold.
There is no reason or expectation for Cruz to condemn something a PAC did that he had absolutely nothing to do with and no knowledge of. If he spent his campaign time condemning everyone who attacked Trump he wouldn't have had time to campaign. I don't know what you're thinking here... no one else that I am aware of condemned what the PAC did... why do you think Cruz should have?
I said he could go to jail if he "asked them to not do it" as you suggested. Cruz can't contact a PAC and/or tell them what to do. That's a violation of law. If you're too stupid to comprehend that, I don't know what to tell you... it's campaign finance law... he cannot have contact with ANY PAC and doing so would be a violation of federal law. Is that not penetrating your granite-like head or something? Besides, he doesn't know what they are going to do... how was he supposed to ask them not to?
You're just living in your own fucked up little universe here dude... are you really THAT ignorant of what PACs are for and why they exist and why candidates cannot have contact with them?
Well, I have no idea what you're talking about. Candidates don't even run their own PACs much less unaffiliated PACs. It's a matter of campaign finance law and you can go to jail for up to two years if you're caught communicating with ANY PAC while running for office.
So what is it you think Cruz should have done about an anti-Trump PAC who he had no knowledge of, putting out photos of Melania that had already been internationally published? Keep in mind, it's not Cruz's job to defend Trump from unwarranted attacks or condemn said attacks. Also keep in mind, Donald Trump used debunked nonsensical stories from the National Enquirer to smear Cruz's family.
Silly me... asking you to keep things in mind... you've obviously lost your damn mind... I don't know what I am thinking.
I'm really not interested in this discussion anymore. You don't have anything new to say, you just keep repeating your tired talking points. We're done here.What part of PUBLIC do you not understand?You know damn good and well I'm talking about a PUBLIC condemnation of the super pac. There's nothing illegal about doing that and you know it. You've been kicked out of the closet and the best you can come up with is "But, but he would go to jail if he condemned the super pac's tactics". Total BULLSHIT and everyone knows it. It doesn't get more pathetic than that.Now I think I've heard everything.
Laugh like a jackass all you like, it's a violation of federal law for any candidate to correspond with any PAC during a political campaign. You can go to prison for up to 2 years and people have. So no, Cruz could NOT have "asked them to not do it" and he is not obligated to police all the assorted PACs to ensure they follow his standards.
It's pitiful how I have reduced you to such a drooling little retard.
Again... it's not Cruz's responsibility to run around monitoring what any PAC does... condemning it, approving it or whatever. He can't legally tell them what to do or even correspond with them. Do you not know the law?
Go educate yourself, it's called McCain-Feingold.
There is no reason or expectation for Cruz to condemn something a PAC did that he had absolutely nothing to do with and no knowledge of. If he spent his campaign time condemning everyone who attacked Trump he wouldn't have had time to campaign. I don't know what you're thinking here... no one else that I am aware of condemned what the PAC did... why do you think Cruz should have?
I said he could go to jail if he "asked them to not do it" as you suggested. Cruz can't contact a PAC and/or tell them what to do. That's a violation of law. If you're too stupid to comprehend that, I don't know what to tell you... it's campaign finance law... he cannot have contact with ANY PAC and doing so would be a violation of federal law. Is that not penetrating your granite-like head or something? Besides, he doesn't know what they are going to do... how was he supposed to ask them not to?
You're just living in your own fucked up little universe here dude... are you really THAT ignorant of what PACs are for and why they exist and why candidates cannot have contact with them?
Well, I have no idea what you're talking about. Candidates don't even run their own PACs much less unaffiliated PACs. It's a matter of campaign finance law and you can go to jail for up to two years if you're caught communicating with ANY PAC while running for office.
So what is it you think Cruz should have done about an anti-Trump PAC who he had no knowledge of, putting out photos of Melania that had already been internationally published? Keep in mind, it's not Cruz's job to defend Trump from unwarranted attacks or condemn said attacks. Also keep in mind, Donald Trump used debunked nonsensical stories from the National Enquirer to smear Cruz's family.
Silly me... asking you to keep things in mind... you've obviously lost your damn mind... I don't know what I am thinking.
Boss
Take a Memo:
Oh, no doubt you're not interested in this conversation anymore... it's because you realize how fatally flawed your argument was and what an absolute dufus it made you look like trying to defend it.
You've somehow transformed into a complete kook-a-doodle liberal through this election cycle. Your debate tactics are exactly the same... throw out some baseless allegation that is easily disproved and when you're schooled, claim the "conversation" is ridiculous and we're done.
You know, it's sad to me that this election, the liberal democrats are pretty much out-of-the-closet Socialists but even more sad is that a good percentage of Republicans have gone completely bonkers and are behaving just like the liberals.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Nearly 60 cases dismissed due to corruption in Alabama police department- Started by EvilEyeFleegle
- Replies: 6
-
-
Congressman Jim McGovern’s (D) 23 year old daughter died unexpectedly- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 34
