I proved your "point" only if your "point" is that you were making a deliberately invalid claim in the first place.
Thanks for admitting that you were just being a troll. That's a healthy first step.
Who claimed they were racist "as a whole"? I was responding to Mr. Clean's posts:
Denying that there isn't an undercurrent of racism in the teabaggers hatred of Obama is just that.
Denial. Palin and simple.
I think it's plain from those signs that there is such an undercurrent. The fact that other teabaggers around them didn't force them to remove those signs is also telling.
There is no undercurrent of racism in the tea party movement or its membership.
If you were interested (for a refreshing change of pace) in being honest and accurate, you could properly QUALIFY your stupid assertion. You could agree with Ms. Unclean to the extent that you suggest that there is an undercurrent of racism in SOME of the members of the Tea Party. That's fair enough. There's an undercurrent of racism in SOME members of the liberal Democrat Parody, too. So what?
Also, this is America. Other Tea Party members were not likely to be telling anybody what they could or could not display -- including ignorant opinions. And the ones who were busy carrying the ignorant signs could easily have been some of the PLANTS from the left.
Overall, Ms. Unclean had no valid point to make, and in your rush to agree with that idiocy, you also had no valid or reasonable point to make. And now, feebly, you are trying to back peddle. But too late. You are stuck with the stupidity you already displayed.
You COULD just admit that you badly, unfairly and unreasonably over-stated the very minor point you were hoping to make -- and drop it. You know. Show a hint of integrity.
