what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

What did the new black panthers do ?? Stand around ?
well let's see...


ANd ?

They were standing outside , just like that white lady behind them .


I must have missed the old ladies billy club.
 
Now watch me smash a verbal custard pie in your kisser:
See if you can find any.....ANY.....such testimony about having evidence.



"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Now wipe that custard pie off your kisser....

....and the drool off your chin.


Spin all you like.
Yesterday indeed happened.



SPIN?????

You imbecile....I provided the videos with Clapper, Comet, et. al., verifying exactly what I stated.


QED....I'm never wrong...you, a reliable Democrat voter


Yes, spin.

Comey stated very clearly that there has been and will continue to be a thorough investigation into the Russian attempts to influence our electoral process and the possible role the Trump campaign played in it. So your examples are premature at best and nothing more than attempts to minimize the story.




BTW....I'm using your post in an OP...because it is illustrative..

A Tale of Two Tales


I have no problem as long as you quote me honestly. Your previous post did not.




Of course I did.

You are free to respond.
 
this is the wikipedia account:

The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 United States elections.[1] An intelligence community assessment stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."[2]
Fine.

Conceded as truth, for the sake of argument.

Now...

Give us a defensible metric, which shows us how many people switched votes, from Clinton to Trump, as a result of that intervention.
The vast majority of voters who decided not to vote for Hillary based on the Russian hack of the totally corrupt DNC stayed home and didn't vote for Clinton OR Trump.
Wise up!


The news of Russians hacking into the election really didn't break until AFTER the election was long over. Hillary Clinton mentioned it during one of the debates but no one paid any attention to that. She called Trump --Putin's puppet if I remember correctly. While Trump said it was some 400 lb. fat guy sitting on his bed doing it.

Trump continually denied it. He denied the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies. At one point even saying "he knows people that know more than they do, and he'll get back with us next week about it." Of course he never did.

Regardless if it changed one single vote, collusion with a Foreign Adversary to interfere into an American National election is TREASON. There is no getting around that.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction, Cover-Up and Lie after Lie when they take over in 2018. Then they'll move into Trumps many foreign conflicts of interest which are (in violation of the Emolution clause in the Constitution.) They will obtain his income tax returns via the Ways & Means committee, something Republicans refused to do a couple of weeks ago.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/...nvestigate-mr-trumps-ties-to-russia.html?_r=1


CroweJ20161216_low.jpg


Watergate pales in comparison to this.

Republican Senate & House members can choose to be the point of the spear and dump Trump asap, or they can write their own obtituaries for 2018-2020 and beyond.

You really couldn't have given Democrats a better gift than electing Donald Trump.

Your prediction that the DEMs will take over Congress in 2018 has the same weight as your prediction Trump would never be elected President.
Still hiding your Trayvon and 'Big Mike' hoodies under your bed asshole?
Once a loser always a loser.
Most of the Beltway already know the name/s of the leakers. They were all working in the FBI as Obama's moles. The AG is going to charge them with multiple federal crimes.



It's clear that Democcrats will be taking over both houses in 2018.

Never before in the history of this nation has the President elect had to barricade himself inside the Trump Tower, and his method of communication to the outside world was reduced to a Twitter account.

Since then we have had massive protests all over this country. These people are not just protesters now, they are activists against the Republican party.

170121211838-28-womens-march-dc-exlarge-169.jpg

This was the woman March the day after Trumps inauguration. This went on in every state. For what was going on in your state go to this link. It's clear they were in the millions.
Woman's march pictures

th


SNL_Trump_protest_ap_img.jpg

These people are also in the millions.

You have awoken a sleeping giant and it's pissed. They aren't going to forget to vote in 2018.

Republicans are slowly becoming aware of this. They admit they are looking at another 2010, only it will be blue all over this country.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty
 
Last edited:
Spin all you like.
Yesterday indeed happened.


SPIN?????

You imbecile....I provided the videos with Clapper, Comet, et. al., verifying exactly what I stated.


QED....I'm never wrong...you, a reliable Democrat voter

Yes, spin.

Comey stated very clearly that there has been and will continue to be a thorough investigation into the Russian attempts to influence our electoral process and the possible role the Trump campaign played in it. So your examples are premature at best and nothing more than attempts to minimize the story.



BTW....I'm using your post in an OP...because it is illustrative..

A Tale of Two Tales

I have no problem as long as you quote me honestly. Your previous post did not.



Of course I did.

You are free to respond.
You didn't.
You are free to respond with the post I asked for.
 
SPIN?????

You imbecile....I provided the videos with Clapper, Comet, et. al., verifying exactly what I stated.


QED....I'm never wrong...you, a reliable Democrat voter

Yes, spin.

Comey stated very clearly that there has been and will continue to be a thorough investigation into the Russian attempts to influence our electoral process and the possible role the Trump campaign played in it. So your examples are premature at best and nothing more than attempts to minimize the story.



BTW....I'm using your post in an OP...because it is illustrative..

A Tale of Two Tales

I have no problem as long as you quote me honestly. Your previous post did not.



Of course I did.

You are free to respond.
You didn't.
You are free to respond with the post I asked for.



A Tale of Two Tales
 
this is the wikipedia account:

The United States Intelligence Community has officially concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 United States elections.[1] An intelligence community assessment stated, "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Hillary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."[2]
Fine.

Conceded as truth, for the sake of argument.

Now...

Give us a defensible metric, which shows us how many people switched votes, from Clinton to Trump, as a result of that intervention.
The vast majority of voters who decided not to vote for Hillary based on the Russian hack of the totally corrupt DNC stayed home and didn't vote for Clinton OR Trump.
Wise up!


The news of Russians hacking into the election really didn't break until AFTER the election was long over. Hillary Clinton mentioned it during one of the debates but no one paid any attention to that. She called Trump --Putin's puppet if I remember correctly. While Trump said it was some 400 lb. fat guy sitting on his bed doing it.

Trump continually denied it. He denied the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies. At one point even saying "he knows people that know more than they do, and he'll get back with us next week about it." Of course he never did.

Regardless if it changed one single vote, collusion with a Foreign Adversary to interfere into an American National election is TREASON. There is no getting around that.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction, Cover-Up and Lie after Lie when they take over in 2018. Then they'll move into Trumps many foreign conflicts of interest which are (in violation of the Emolution clause in the Constitution.) They will obtain his income tax returns via the Ways & Means committee, something Republicans refused to do a couple of weeks ago.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/...nvestigate-mr-trumps-ties-to-russia.html?_r=1


CroweJ20161216_low.jpg


Watergate pales in comparison to this.

Republican Senate & House members can choose to be the point of the spear and dump Trump asap, or they can write their own obtituaries for 2018-2020 and beyond.

You really couldn't have given Democrats a better gift than electing Donald Trump.

Your prediction that the DEMs will take over Congress in 2018 has the same weight as your prediction Trump would never be elected President.
Still hiding your Trayvon and 'Big Mike' hoodies under your bed asshole?
Once a loser always a loser.
Most of the Beltway already know the name/s of the leakers. They were all working in the FBI as Obama's moles. The AG is going to charge them with multiple federal crimes.



It's clear that Democcrats will be taking over both houses in 2018.

In the history of this nation, there has never been a President Elect that had to barricade himself inside the Trump tower on the announcement that he won the election. and his communications to the outside world was reduced to a Twitter account.

Since then we have had massive protests all over this country. These people are not just protesters now, they are activists against the Republican party.

170121211838-28-womens-march-dc-exlarge-169.jpg

This was the woman March the day after Trumps inauguration. This went on in every state. For what was going on in your state go to this link. It's clear they were in the millions.
Woman's march pictures

th


SNL_Trump_protest_ap_img.jpg

These people are also in the millions.

You have awoken a sleeping giant and it's pissed. They aren't going to forget to vote in 2018.

Republicans are slowly becoming aware of this. They admit they are looking at another 2010, only it will be blue all over this country.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty




Trump stops his motorcade to greet fans....





Remember when Obama did that?

Me neither.
 
...You just proved my point...
No, son, you just proved mine... namely, that you cannot provide a defensible metric to gauge the impact of the leaks-disclosures on the Clinton-vs-Trump contest.

All you can serve up is a recital of protocol violations and circumstances; you have not told us how many people switched their votes from Clinton to Trump at that time.

...You're a Sanders supporter...
Correct. I was. I voted for Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the Illinois Primary last year.

...that Believes that someone can win by losing by
3,775,427 popular votes in a primary, which is exactly how badly she BEAT Bernie Sanders ASS. You still believe the deck was stacked against Sanders...
But the deck WAS stacked against Bernie Sanders; that's how Shrillary won by the margins she did in many states; leaning on the Democratic Party Ruling Elites to push her to the fore and to push Bernie into the background; to do her dirty work for her; so that she would not have the appearance of having dirty hands; an idea that backfired.

Had the deck NOT been stacked, the vote would probably have been closer; although that, too, is groundless speculation, akin to your own, with a different focus; the differene between us being that I am willing to concede the speculative nature of that observation, whereas you (and yours) delude yourselves that Shrillary lost due to outside influence.

...& then you voted for Trump to prove your ignorance...
Incorrect. I voted for Shrillary rather than He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named; although I felt dirty doing it, and wanted a shower by the time I got home from the polling place.

...We had two candidates that were campaigning on a RIGGED election, (Sanders & Trump) and in truth it was RIGGED, only it was rigged against Hillary Clinton...
Oh, look, Mumsie, it's another Kornspiracy Theory Stab-In-the-Back nutjob... isn't it a cute little delusional twit?

That's right, LibTard... blame everybody else but yourselves and your staggeringly flawed candidate for your humiliation at the polls.

Ya'll really need to grow-the-phukk up and think really hard about why White Christian Middle America just *****-slapped you at the polls on November 8, 2016.

Get a grip, kid, and get some eyeglasses...

You're gonna need 'em when it comes time to take that long, hard look in the mirror, seeking the true cause for your defeat at the polls.

For those few of you who are honest enough and pragmatic enough to do it, anyway...
OP- DUMB. Only the dupes are going on about collusion. There is circumstantial evidence and need for an investigation

Bernie says there was no rigging DUH. But 8 months of media self promoting BS about STUPID staff bs OF COURSE cost Hillary. Not as much as COMEY the GOP a-hole....just like lying cheating greedy rich GOP and the silly dupes like you. Enjoy the giant tax cuts for the rich...
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.


Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?
those guys don't talk specifics, they can't. no offense but we're still looking for something concrete.
i think people underestimate the power the media used to have as a tool for obama.
those days are gone.
 
...You just proved my point...
No, son, you just proved mine... namely, that you cannot provide a defensible metric to gauge the impact of the leaks-disclosures on the Clinton-vs-Trump contest.

All you can serve up is a recital of protocol violations and circumstances; you have not told us how many people switched their votes from Clinton to Trump at that time.

...You're a Sanders supporter...
Correct. I was. I voted for Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the Illinois Primary last year.

...that Believes that someone can win by losing by
3,775,427 popular votes in a primary, which is exactly how badly she BEAT Bernie Sanders ASS. You still believe the deck was stacked against Sanders...
But the deck WAS stacked against Bernie Sanders; that's how Shrillary won by the margins she did in many states; leaning on the Democratic Party Ruling Elites to push her to the fore and to push Bernie into the background; to do her dirty work for her; so that she would not have the appearance of having dirty hands; an idea that backfired.

Had the deck NOT been stacked, the vote would probably have been closer; although that, too, is groundless speculation, akin to your own, with a different focus; the differene between us being that I am willing to concede the speculative nature of that observation, whereas you (and yours) delude yourselves that Shrillary lost due to outside influence.

...& then you voted for Trump to prove your ignorance...
Incorrect. I voted for Shrillary rather than He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named; although I felt dirty doing it, and wanted a shower by the time I got home from the polling place.

...We had two candidates that were campaigning on a RIGGED election, (Sanders & Trump) and in truth it was RIGGED, only it was rigged against Hillary Clinton...
Oh, look, Mumsie, it's another Kornspiracy Theory Stab-In-the-Back nutjob... isn't it a cute little delusional twit?

That's right, LibTard... blame everybody else but yourselves and your staggeringly flawed candidate for your humiliation at the polls.

Ya'll really need to grow-the-phukk up and think really hard about why White Christian Middle America just *****-slapped you at the polls on November 8, 2016.

Get a grip, kid, and get some eyeglasses...

You're gonna need 'em when it comes time to take that long, hard look in the mirror, seeking the true cause for your defeat at the polls.

For those few of you who are honest enough and pragmatic enough to do it, anyway...
OP- DUMB. Only the dupes are going on about collusion. There is circumstantial evidence and need for an investigation

Bernie says there was no rigging DUH. But 8 months of media self promoting BS about STUPID staff bs OF COURSE cost Hillary. Not as much as COMEY the GOP a-hole....just like lying cheating greedy rich GOP and the silly dupes like you. Enjoy the giant tax cuts for the rich...
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
those are exit polls.

Yes, after people voted. That's how demographic data is collected.
Now answer how the DNC rigged the way people voted nationwide. Sanders was always behind in demographics.
 
Fine.

Conceded as truth, for the sake of argument.

Now...

Give us a defensible metric, which shows us how many people switched votes, from Clinton to Trump, as a result of that intervention.
The vast majority of voters who decided not to vote for Hillary based on the Russian hack of the totally corrupt DNC stayed home and didn't vote for Clinton OR Trump.
Wise up!


The news of Russians hacking into the election really didn't break until AFTER the election was long over. Hillary Clinton mentioned it during one of the debates but no one paid any attention to that. She called Trump --Putin's puppet if I remember correctly. While Trump said it was some 400 lb. fat guy sitting on his bed doing it.

Trump continually denied it. He denied the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies. At one point even saying "he knows people that know more than they do, and he'll get back with us next week about it." Of course he never did.

Regardless if it changed one single vote, collusion with a Foreign Adversary to interfere into an American National election is TREASON. There is no getting around that.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction, Cover-Up and Lie after Lie when they take over in 2018. Then they'll move into Trumps many foreign conflicts of interest which are (in violation of the Emolution clause in the Constitution.) They will obtain his income tax returns via the Ways & Means committee, something Republicans refused to do a couple of weeks ago.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/...nvestigate-mr-trumps-ties-to-russia.html?_r=1


CroweJ20161216_low.jpg


Watergate pales in comparison to this.

Republican Senate & House members can choose to be the point of the spear and dump Trump asap, or they can write their own obtituaries for 2018-2020 and beyond.

You really couldn't have given Democrats a better gift than electing Donald Trump.

Your prediction that the DEMs will take over Congress in 2018 has the same weight as your prediction Trump would never be elected President.
Still hiding your Trayvon and 'Big Mike' hoodies under your bed asshole?
Once a loser always a loser.
Most of the Beltway already know the name/s of the leakers. They were all working in the FBI as Obama's moles. The AG is going to charge them with multiple federal crimes.



It's clear that Democcrats will be taking over both houses in 2018.

In the history of this nation, there has never been a President Elect that had to barricade himself inside the Trump tower on the announcement that he won the election. and his communications to the outside world was reduced to a Twitter account.

Since then we have had massive protests all over this country. These people are not just protesters now, they are activists against the Republican party.

170121211838-28-womens-march-dc-exlarge-169.jpg

This was the woman March the day after Trumps inauguration. This went on in every state. For what was going on in your state go to this link. It's clear they were in the millions.
Woman's march pictures

th


SNL_Trump_protest_ap_img.jpg

These people are also in the millions.

You have awoken a sleeping giant and it's pissed. They aren't going to forget to vote in 2018.

Republicans are slowly becoming aware of this. They admit they are looking at another 2010, only it will be blue all over this country.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty




Trump stops his motorcade to greet fans....





Remember when Obama did that?

Me neither.



Ha.ha--Deflection back to Barack Obama doesn't help your argument.

new-york-womens-march.jpg


March+aerials+2+1-21-17.JPG


90


You have elected someone that more than half this country can actually hate. It's not going to get any better for Trump with this Russian news all over every media outlet in this country.

The only ones that are still supporting Trump are the typical physco babble interpreters who have surrounded him through-out this campaign, and his fairy godfather Sean Hannity.

So Republicans have two choices. They can DUMP Trump now, by being the point of the spear, or go down with him in 2018--2020 and beyond. Again, if Republicans can do 8 investigations over Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction, Coverup, and lies in 2018. And they won't have any issues using the Ways and Means Committee to obtain his income tax returns. They will also go after him for being in violation of the Emolument clause in the U.S. Constitution.

You really could not have given Democrats a better GIFT than electing Donald Trump.
 
Last edited:
For the thousandth time, they used the criminal enterprise of hacking to invade the privacy rights of people in the DNC and released the stolen material to the public for the express purpose of undermining the Clinton campaign.
And despite that, they didn't get into the ballot box which is what the OP specified. The DNC hack only exposed the DNC for the corrupt entity that it was. For the 1000th time.

Do you believe the exposure of corruption hurt Clinton's chances of winning?
Not at all. The exposures of The Leaks....they were Leaks not Hacks....were all about The Democrat Party and not Hillary Clinton herself.

It was her history of corruption that sunk her.
  • White Water
  • Bimbo Gate
  • Mena Arkansas Drug Ring
  • Rose Law Firm
  • Travel Gate
  • FBI File Gate
  • $2 Billion Haitian Earthquake Relief Fund Theft
  • Benghazi and her lying to Congress under Oath
  • Uranium One
  • Her receiving $125 Million afterwards from Russia
  • Her accepting $100 Million from Saudi Arabia, and then later arranging for a special arms deal for them
  • The Clinton Foundation Influence Peddling Scandal & Money Laundering Investigation that mysteriously got buried after Lynch Unethically and illegally met with Bill Clinton.
  • Using the State Department as a conduit to solicit donations to The Clinton Foundation
  • $6 Billion Dollars Vanishing at The State Department with No Explanation
  • The Clinton Cash Documentary none of the facts have been able to be refuted
  • Her Private Server, built to be concealed and circumvent The State Department Security and policies, and avoid FOIA Laws
  • Bleach Bit.
  • The Destruction of 33,000 emails violating two federal court preservation orders.
  • Her lies about her 1 device when she had 17.
  • The Violation of Two Federal Court Ordered Preservation Orders.
  • Comey coming out and saying she was guilty of Title 18 violations but was too stupid to go to jail for it.
  • Comey granting her entire staff immunity and then sealing their testimonies.
  • Her Public and Private Positions
  • Her calling Sanders supporters Basement Dwellers
  • Her calling Blacks Super Predators
  • Her calling Latinos Lazy Taco Bowls
  • Her calling Trump Supporters "A Basket of Irredeemable Deplorables"
  • Her calling people in flyover states "Uneducated Rednecks."
  • Her telling Coal Miners to Pound Salt and that she was going to put then out of work
  • Her paying The Homeless, Drug Addicts, and Felons to go to Trump Rallies and instigate Violence and Bloody and Intimidate Trump Supporters.
  • Her and The DNC paying for Fake Protestors
  • Her and Donna Brazille stealing Debate Questions
  • Her and the MSM conspiring together to craft stories favorable to her, edited by her
  • Her Conspiring with the Media to have them give her questions to interviews prior to her being interviewed so she could rehearse the perfect sound bites, and responses.
  • The DNC rigging their own Primary, and Schultz getting fired for it
  • TITLE 18 US CODE Section 798

The only people that think unethical behavior and criminality is a virtue is the Godless Democrat Party of Soviet Era Socialists.
And they'd vote for Clinton if she was Hitler herself.
 
Last edited:
Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?



No intell agency has ever......ever....claimed that there was any such evidence.

It was done so with innuendo that allows morons to post as you have.

Testimony under oath is not innuendo, fool.


Now watch me smash a verbal custard pie in your kisser:
See if you can find any.....ANY.....such testimony about having evidence.



"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Now wipe that custard pie off your kisser....

....and the drool off your chin.

YEAH..!!! what she said !
 
No, son, you just proved mine... namely, that you cannot provide a defensible metric to gauge the impact of the leaks-disclosures on the Clinton-vs-Trump contest.

All you can serve up is a recital of protocol violations and circumstances; you have not told us how many people switched their votes from Clinton to Trump at that time.


Correct. I was. I voted for Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the Illinois Primary last year.

But the deck WAS stacked against Bernie Sanders; that's how Shrillary won by the margins she did in many states; leaning on the Democratic Party Ruling Elites to push her to the fore and to push Bernie into the background; to do her dirty work for her; so that she would not have the appearance of having dirty hands; an idea that backfired.

Had the deck NOT been stacked, the vote would probably have been closer; although that, too, is groundless speculation, akin to your own, with a different focus; the differene between us being that I am willing to concede the speculative nature of that observation, whereas you (and yours) delude yourselves that Shrillary lost due to outside influence.


Incorrect. I voted for Shrillary rather than He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named; although I felt dirty doing it, and wanted a shower by the time I got home from the polling place.

Oh, look, Mumsie, it's another Kornspiracy Theory Stab-In-the-Back nutjob... isn't it a cute little delusional twit?

That's right, LibTard... blame everybody else but yourselves and your staggeringly flawed candidate for your humiliation at the polls.

Ya'll really need to grow-the-phukk up and think really hard about why White Christian Middle America just *****-slapped you at the polls on November 8, 2016.

Get a grip, kid, and get some eyeglasses...

You're gonna need 'em when it comes time to take that long, hard look in the mirror, seeking the true cause for your defeat at the polls.

For those few of you who are honest enough and pragmatic enough to do it, anyway...
OP- DUMB. Only the dupes are going on about collusion. There is circumstantial evidence and need for an investigation

Bernie says there was no rigging DUH. But 8 months of media self promoting BS about STUPID staff bs OF COURSE cost Hillary. Not as much as COMEY the GOP a-hole....just like lying cheating greedy rich GOP and the silly dupes like you. Enjoy the giant tax cuts for the rich...
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
those are exit polls.

Yes, after people voted. That's how demographic data is collected.
Now answer how the DNC rigged the way people voted nationwide. Sanders was always behind in demographics.



Wow....you buy the DNC propaganda like it was on sale.


"The email release, only days away from the Democratic Primary, shed light into potential election fraud (the DNC hasn’t confirmed the accuracy of the email release) and questions regarding how Clinton won the presumptive Democratic nomination."
WikiLeaks Emails Show DNC Favored Hillary Clinton Over Bernie Sanders During The Democratic Primary | The Huffington Post


"Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”
Critics say the unelected superdelegate system is rigged. Debbie Wasserman Schultz basically admitted this is true."
Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”



OK...now say "duuhhhhh."
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.


Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?
those guys don't talk specifics, they can't. no offense but we're still looking for something concrete.

It's as concrete as it ever gets. You will never know the classified bits of the Benghazi story even after 8 investigations. The simple fact that Comey came out and confirmed an investigation while it's ongoing should tell you how significant it is.
 
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?



No intell agency has ever......ever....claimed that there was any such evidence.

It was done so with innuendo that allows morons to post as you have.

Testimony under oath is not innuendo, fool.


Now watch me smash a verbal custard pie in your kisser:
See if you can find any.....ANY.....such testimony about having evidence.



"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Now wipe that custard pie off your kisser....

....and the drool off your chin.

YEAH..!!! what she said !


She didn't say anything.
 
can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.


Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????
right, again the liberal interpretation of evidence turns out to be hearsay. the democrat party is a tortise on it's back, which is unpleasant for all of us.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?
those guys don't talk specifics, they can't. no offense but we're still looking for something concrete.

It's as concrete as it ever gets. You will never know the classified bits of the Benghazi story even after 8 investigations. The simple fact that Comey came out and confirmed an investigation while it's ongoing should tell you how significant it is.



"It's as concrete as it ever gets."

There's only one thing that's 'concrete'....and it's evident to any who read your posts.....
...the concrete is book-ended by your ears.
 
15th post
OP- DUMB. Only the dupes are going on about collusion. There is circumstantial evidence and need for an investigation

Bernie says there was no rigging DUH. But 8 months of media self promoting BS about STUPID staff bs OF COURSE cost Hillary. Not as much as COMEY the GOP a-hole....just like lying cheating greedy rich GOP and the silly dupes like you. Enjoy the giant tax cuts for the rich...
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
those are exit polls.

Yes, after people voted. That's how demographic data is collected.
Now answer how the DNC rigged the way people voted nationwide. Sanders was always behind in demographics.



Wow....you buy the DNC propaganda like it was on sale.


"The email release, only days away from the Democratic Primary, shed light into potential election fraud (the DNC hasn’t confirmed the accuracy of the email release) and questions regarding how Clinton won the presumptive Democratic nomination."
WikiLeaks Emails Show DNC Favored Hillary Clinton Over Bernie Sanders During The Democratic Primary | The Huffington Post


"Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”
Critics say the unelected superdelegate system is rigged. Debbie Wasserman Schultz basically admitted this is true."
Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”



OK...now say "duuhhhhh."
Super delegates don't cause someone to lose by nearly four million votes, dope.

Your game is weak.
 
Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?



No intell agency has ever......ever....claimed that there was any such evidence.

It was done so with innuendo that allows morons to post as you have.

Testimony under oath is not innuendo, fool.


Now watch me smash a verbal custard pie in your kisser:
See if you can find any.....ANY.....such testimony about having evidence.



"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Now wipe that custard pie off your kisser....

....and the drool off your chin.

YEAH..!!! what she said !


She didn't say anything.

Is it really "hearsay" when it comes from the directors of the FBI and NSA?



No intell agency has ever......ever....claimed that there was any such evidence.

It was done so with innuendo that allows morons to post as you have.

Testimony under oath is not innuendo, fool.


Now watch me smash a verbal custard pie in your kisser:
See if you can find any.....ANY.....such testimony about having evidence.



"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Now wipe that custard pie off your kisser....

....and the drool off your chin.

YEAH..!!! what she said !


She didn't say anything.



"She didn't say anything."



hqdefault.jpg




Sooooo....that first one is you?


Can I get an autograph?
 
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
those are exit polls.

Yes, after people voted. That's how demographic data is collected.
Now answer how the DNC rigged the way people voted nationwide. Sanders was always behind in demographics.



Wow....you buy the DNC propaganda like it was on sale.


"The email release, only days away from the Democratic Primary, shed light into potential election fraud (the DNC hasn’t confirmed the accuracy of the email release) and questions regarding how Clinton won the presumptive Democratic nomination."
WikiLeaks Emails Show DNC Favored Hillary Clinton Over Bernie Sanders During The Democratic Primary | The Huffington Post


"Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”
Critics say the unelected superdelegate system is rigged. Debbie Wasserman Schultz basically admitted this is true."
Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”



OK...now say "duuhhhhh."
Super delegates don't cause someone to lose by nearly four million votes, dope.

Your game is weak.



That's two Liberal house organs you're denying.....HuppPo and Salon.

Yeah, you must be right.....

OK...now say "duuhhhhh."
 
as a vermonter i can attest that bernie got rigged.

Too funny.
As if living in Vermont gives you "special" insight. :laugh:

Explain how the DNC was able to force these voter demographics to vote as they did nationwide.
View attachment 117723
everyone on this board has special insight. bernie's first elections he got like 5 %
he's a nice man, he really is, but the campaign impugned his dialog. i live in florida half the year, where there is gobs of special insight. those are exit polls.
those are exit polls.

Yes, after people voted. That's how demographic data is collected.
Now answer how the DNC rigged the way people voted nationwide. Sanders was always behind in demographics.



Wow....you buy the DNC propaganda like it was on sale.


"The email release, only days away from the Democratic Primary, shed light into potential election fraud (the DNC hasn’t confirmed the accuracy of the email release) and questions regarding how Clinton won the presumptive Democratic nomination."
WikiLeaks Emails Show DNC Favored Hillary Clinton Over Bernie Sanders During The Democratic Primary | The Huffington Post


"Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”
Critics say the unelected superdelegate system is rigged. Debbie Wasserman Schultz basically admitted this is true."
Un-Democratic Party: DNC chair says superdelegates ensure elites don’t have to run “against grassroots activists”



OK...now say "duuhhhhh."
Super delegates don't cause someone to lose by nearly four million votes, dope.

Your game is weak.



".... leaked emails which seemed to show a plot by DNC officials to damage Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primary.

The revelations created doubts from various sectors of the party about how Wasserman Schultz could oversee a convention meant to showcase party unity.

By late Saturday, opposition inside the party "spread like wildfire," according to a Democratic source close to the matter. It resulted in a tense confrontation Sunday when officials told Wasserman Schultz she had to go.

Wasserman Schultz had become toxic to supporters of Sanders, who accused her of rigging the Democratic presidential nominating process in favor of Clinton."
DNC Chief Stepping Down in Wake of Leaked Email Scandal



You've heard of NBC,....haven't you, Einstein?
 
Back
Top Bottom