- Banned
- #1
2 Corinthians 5:20-21 "Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God. 21For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."
We are ambassadors for Christ Messiah since He has left with us the gifts to do so properly. With that same Oneness Spirit which is of the giving of testimony and giving of record to that which is foundationally Truth. There are 3 which agree; both in Heaven and in Earth. One bearing record; the other bearing witness.
Bearing witness like 'bearing'; maybe even as in longsuffering. There are 3; in Heaven and in Earth which suffers long to and with The Truth over and with the ambassadors and others who live; not only humans but also all of creation; which awaits with hopeful and expectant expectation for that joyful 'hope'.
So we are become as ambassadors for Christ because we have chosen to receive of the Church; His Body; of which He is Head and of which God is Head of Him. Christ Messiah being Head of man and God Being Head of Christ Messiah.
So be ye reconciled to The Head of Christ Messiah. For He hath made Him to be 'sin' for the sake of our free cleansing by and through His Son; His High Priest; by Whom Is The ONLY 'Begotten' Way of pardon after the sacrificing for 'sin' through the shedding of blood of animals was 'done away' with. 1 Old law was 'done away' with and this has cost The Christ Messiah His 'death' to and by which He became the offering by which 'sin' is cleansed. The Only 'begotten' Way.
So be ye reconciled and reconcile others to God through Christ Messiah:
because:
2 Corinthians 5:21
"... he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."
He hath made Him to be 'sin' for us; who knew no sin; that we might be made free as the animal sacrificing for sin was made free; which is the righteousness of God in Him; which is the NOT shedding of innocent blood.
The animal sacrificing accepted by Their prescribed 'terms' was considered a 'kill' because it followed Their 'guidelines'. The shedding of innocent blood outside of Their Law Guide-lines was/is considered 'murder'; not 'kill'.
Exodus 20:13
Thou shalt not:
And Cain 'slew' Abel.
But Cain did not murder Abel.
Cain slew Abel that when The LORD asked Cain why Abel's puddle of blood was there on the ground but Abel was not there; 'Where is Abel, thy brother', The Holy Bible is often misinterpreted as Cain 'murdered' Abel. But The LORD asked, 'where is Abel'? Why is his blood here but he is not? Cain's response, 'he is not dead. Am I my brother's 'keeper' needing to be like his 'shepherd' to 'follow' him around'? But nonetheless; Cain 'slew' Abel.
The LORD did not ask Cain, 'why did you beat Abel, your brother'. The LORD asked, 'where is your brother, Abel'?
So first be ye reconciled to God through that righteousness because of which Christ Messiah became 'sin' for us. That the 'shedding of innocent' blood may be understood and so that it may be known; that 'the shedding' of innocent blood is 'sin'/murder.
So the next question to justify. What is to be understood and/or considered to be deemed 'innocent'?
But wait. This might include 'foods' eaten. True.. So maybe the next thought and choice can be; which will you choose to be your God? Your belly or another?
Another? Another; maybe as in 'self'.
In Jainism, although vegans, devout adherents will 'starve' because they do not want to 'murder' even the grass and vegetables and fruits because to them it is 'murder'.
And the prophet of The Most High; (J)ohn the Baptist, ate locusts and honey.
Luke 1:76 "And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways;"
Matthew 3:4 "And the same John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey."
And when he came forth from out of the 'wild', he must have NOT have had 'short' hair, right? But it says that for a man to have long hair was a shame unto himself. So how would/could the prophet of The Most High have been a 'shame' unto himself by not having his hair 'not long'?
And when he came forth from out of the wild, he remained on the banks of the (J)ordan River which is on the border wilderness separating East and West.
So yes... Nature itself teaches that if a man have long hair it is a shame unto himself. And this is why 'they' went out to see him. Otherwise he would not have been listened to if he went into their civilities with his 'possible' long hair.
www./iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.mFiVFZj_kvB3jZajCW2slwHaFj%26pid%3DApi%26h%3D160&f=1
We are ambassadors for Christ Messiah since He has left with us the gifts to do so properly. With that same Oneness Spirit which is of the giving of testimony and giving of record to that which is foundationally Truth. There are 3 which agree; both in Heaven and in Earth. One bearing record; the other bearing witness.
Bearing witness like 'bearing'; maybe even as in longsuffering. There are 3; in Heaven and in Earth which suffers long to and with The Truth over and with the ambassadors and others who live; not only humans but also all of creation; which awaits with hopeful and expectant expectation for that joyful 'hope'.
So we are become as ambassadors for Christ because we have chosen to receive of the Church; His Body; of which He is Head and of which God is Head of Him. Christ Messiah being Head of man and God Being Head of Christ Messiah.
So be ye reconciled to The Head of Christ Messiah. For He hath made Him to be 'sin' for the sake of our free cleansing by and through His Son; His High Priest; by Whom Is The ONLY 'Begotten' Way of pardon after the sacrificing for 'sin' through the shedding of blood of animals was 'done away' with. 1 Old law was 'done away' with and this has cost The Christ Messiah His 'death' to and by which He became the offering by which 'sin' is cleansed. The Only 'begotten' Way.
So be ye reconciled and reconcile others to God through Christ Messiah:
because:
2 Corinthians 5:21
"... he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."
He hath made Him to be 'sin' for us; who knew no sin; that we might be made free as the animal sacrificing for sin was made free; which is the righteousness of God in Him; which is the NOT shedding of innocent blood.
The animal sacrificing accepted by Their prescribed 'terms' was considered a 'kill' because it followed Their 'guidelines'. The shedding of innocent blood outside of Their Law Guide-lines was/is considered 'murder'; not 'kill'.
Exodus 20:13
Thou shalt not:
| 7523. ratsach |
| Strong's Concordance ratsach: to murder, slay Original Word: רָצַחPart of Speech: Verb Transliteration: ratsach Phonetic Spelling: (raw-tsakh') |
And Cain 'slew' Abel.
But Cain did not murder Abel.
Cain slew Abel that when The LORD asked Cain why Abel's puddle of blood was there on the ground but Abel was not there; 'Where is Abel, thy brother', The Holy Bible is often misinterpreted as Cain 'murdered' Abel. But The LORD asked, 'where is Abel'? Why is his blood here but he is not? Cain's response, 'he is not dead. Am I my brother's 'keeper' needing to be like his 'shepherd' to 'follow' him around'? But nonetheless; Cain 'slew' Abel.
The LORD did not ask Cain, 'why did you beat Abel, your brother'. The LORD asked, 'where is your brother, Abel'?
So first be ye reconciled to God through that righteousness because of which Christ Messiah became 'sin' for us. That the 'shedding of innocent' blood may be understood and so that it may be known; that 'the shedding' of innocent blood is 'sin'/murder.
So the next question to justify. What is to be understood and/or considered to be deemed 'innocent'?
| 5355. naqiy ► |
| Strong's Concordance naqiy: blameless Original Word: נָקִיPart of Speech: Adjective Transliteration: naqiy Phonetic Spelling: (naw-kee') Definition: clean, free from, exempt |
But wait. This might include 'foods' eaten. True.. So maybe the next thought and choice can be; which will you choose to be your God? Your belly or another?
Another? Another; maybe as in 'self'.
In Jainism, although vegans, devout adherents will 'starve' because they do not want to 'murder' even the grass and vegetables and fruits because to them it is 'murder'.
And the prophet of The Most High; (J)ohn the Baptist, ate locusts and honey.
Luke 1:76 "And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways;"
| 5310. hupsistos |
| Strong's Concordance hupsistos: highest, most high Original Word: ὕψιστος, η, ονPart of Speech: Adjective Transliteration: hupsistos Phonetic Spelling: (hoop'-sis-tos) Definition: highest, most high Usage: highest, most high, the heights. |
Matthew 3:4 "And the same John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey."
And when he came forth from out of the 'wild', he must have NOT have had 'short' hair, right? But it says that for a man to have long hair was a shame unto himself. So how would/could the prophet of The Most High have been a 'shame' unto himself by not having his hair 'not long'?
And when he came forth from out of the wild, he remained on the banks of the (J)ordan River which is on the border wilderness separating East and West.
So yes... Nature itself teaches that if a man have long hair it is a shame unto himself. And this is why 'they' went out to see him. Otherwise he would not have been listened to if he went into their civilities with his 'possible' long hair.
www./iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.mFiVFZj_kvB3jZajCW2slwHaFj%26pid%3DApi%26h%3D160&f=1
Last edited:
