Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Ever tried bearing a nuke?Gun are a sub-category of arms.
Since the Second Amendment clearly says the right to bear ARMS, when can I get a nuke?
I would definitely like some grenades, too. RPG's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ever tried bearing a nuke?Gun are a sub-category of arms.
Since the Second Amendment clearly says the right to bear ARMS, when can I get a nuke?
I would definitely like some grenades, too. RPG's.
A federal mandate would just be as unconstitutional as Roe v. Wade.Exactly.
All of our rights and protected liberties are in jeopardy, under attack by Republicans.
Give the kid up for adoption.If you have 9 children already that you and the hubby can't afford to feed and dress, and are pregnant again, and you and the hubby decide that you can't afford another child without harming the well being of your 9 living children, is it really ok for big government to force the woman or married couple, to bear another child? Her risks of dying in delivery is much greater in her elder years as she is in, can not be discarded either...
Now we can go in to, well she should have used birth control or the hubby should have used a rubber every time they had sex to prevent it....blah blah blah......
But that still doesn't answer the question of whether Big Government should have any say on this personal and private marital decision? Or even know the two of you are discussing your options?
NATION WIDE? NEW YORK. CALIFORNIA BANS AFTER 16 WEEKS??????????
Me and you have been here before.......And you played a game. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.
What is marraige?and then birth control.
That is the platform you all need to run on in Nov....ending same sex marraige and outlawing birth control.
they have pensionsWhy would Florida want them? Oh, they could make a living in one of many freak shows!
Your knowledge of history is underwhelming. When was the Electoral College winner take all for the first time? You do know Nebraska and Maine split their EC votes by Congressional district, right?Easier said than done!
The system has been rigged, for a two party system, by the two parties!
The electoral college has also been rigged by the States with Winner takes all electors, instead of it being proportionately allocated electors to the candidates by the votes they receive. A third party candidate doesn't have a chance, before they even start!
Another Democrat lie, accusing someone else of lying!The three new justices said that....but they lied
Let see the quotes, dumbass!How they would vote on a challenge to Roe. Don't be obtuse.
It doesn't mean that precedent cannot be overturned.When you recognize precedent...you're implying that you also respect it...dumbass
That's odd. They could find no support for abortion anywhere in the Constitution and returned the decision to the states."Some politicized Court" just did exactly that
All bullshit.1 in 4 women has an abortion before age 40. Every woman knows someone who had an abortion that save their lives, either on account of rape, abuse, or other factors.
WOMEN ARE PISSED AS HELL, AND YOU'VE LOST ALL OF THEIR VOTES. This will be like 2018 all over again.
Bullshit. If that were the case, black kids would go to segregated schools and blacks would have their own train cars. Can you imagine a NYC subway train divided by race?When a judge says he recognizes precedent...he's saying he will FOLLOW that precedent
That is your baseless opinion.Your first sentence has nothing to do with the second.
This is a BLATANTLY politicized Court
Sure! Change our entire political and judicial system because you can't kill unborn babies anymore!The next thing these ultra right wingers are going after is fetal personhood
That ends abortion totally
We NEED MORE Dem Senators and we need to expand the court
No, he did NOT! He wrote a concurring opinion that several other issues be reviewed.UNCLE clarence TOMas is coming for that --- BIRTH CONTROL next. he put out a statement addressing exactly THAT.
Go ahead and invest in it if you think that is true!Abortion Tourism will be a new and booming business!
The shift to statewide winner-take-all was not done for idealistic reasons. Rather, it was the product of partisan pragmatism, as state leaders wanted to maximize support for their preferred candidate. Once some states made this calculation, others had to follow, to avoid hurting their side. James Madison's 1823 letter to George Hay, described in my earlier post, explains that few of the constitutional framers anticipated electors being chosen based on winner-take-all rules.Your knowledge of history is underwhelming. When was the Electoral College winner take all for the first time? You do know Nebraska and Maine split their EC votes by Congressional district, right?
They believe other rights will be taken away like gay marriage, contraception and other areas of this issue. Even though Alito has already said no in the decision.
Is there any support in the constitution for citizens making their own medical decisions or any support in the constitution that supports citizens planning their families thru contraception?That's odd. They could find no support for abortion anywhere in the Constitution and returned the decision to the states.