Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
I've read enough of your posts to know you believe every conspiracy that comes along.
You're just another RWNJ computer cowboy, living off the very gubt you say you hate.
Western Media Is Worth of Sh*t: They Are Only Good in Demonizing Russia
- Thread starter Stratford57
- Start date
I've read enough of your posts to know you believe every conspiracy that comes along.
You're just another RWNJ computer cowboy, living off the very gubt you say you hate.
Dale Smith
Platinum Member
Nope, but a lot shit has been done to us that has been contrived by this corporate structure that you call a "gubermint". You claim that I live off of this corporate entity....prove it or from this point forward be labeled a lying POS....... the onus is on you. I look forward to bashing you with this every chance I get unless you recant your lie.....ball is in your court Just bear in mind that I will rub this in your face every chance I get much to the cheers of your detractors that despise you.
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
Back in the 90s, I attracted the attention of a stalker. Back then, we still didn't have laws concerning cyber-stalking and I was pretty much on my own. I took it upon myself to learn everything I could and I continue to use the internet to protect myself.
People have no idea, absolutely NO CLUE about how much they share on a message board like this. You have given out a lot of info - a lot more than you are aware of.
Speaking of "detractors who despise you", the people you need to be more aware of are those who read but never register or post. Before your time, the old software would show the number of lurkers at the bottom of the front page. That number was always more than 1000. Some are bots but many are not and posters have no way of knowing who is reading what they write.
If you have more questions about what I"m talking about, I suggest you write cereal_killer because that's all you'll get from me.
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
Back to the topic of the thread -
Call me old fashioned but I'm of a time when Americans defended their country.
Now we're seeing RWNJs defending Russia.
That disgusts me. It really does.
Call me old fashioned but I'm of a time when Americans defended their country.
Now we're seeing RWNJs defending Russia.
That disgusts me. It really does.
Dale Smith
Platinum Member
I don't sweat a ******* thing...not the NSA or the malcontent poster that gets all butt hurt about the things that I post. I have a higher power that supercedes this corporate gubermint body. There will be water if God wills it....so far so good. Now, are you going to take back the things that you said about me sucking on "da gubermint" teat or do I have to rub your lies in your face every chance I get????
Bleipriester
Freedom!
That´s not the point.
What is patriotism to you? Ignoring the wrongdoing of the government and equating it with the nation?
Dale Smith
Platinum Member
Last edited:
Bleipriester
Freedom!
BIG N24 BULLSHIT REPORT FROM PALMYRA
Is it more honest to stay away in the consequence?
Geman News TV N24 broadcasted a big bullshit report from Palmyra. The pictures show Russian forces cordoning off endangered areas and searching for explosives but the commentator´s story is another: Neither the liberation from ISIS nor the returning civilians were thematized but the Palmyra prison that is allegedly notorious, particularly for "regime opponents". Talking of "regime opponents", a westerly dressed young woman was shown. The report suggested this woman belongs to the "moderate opposition", which is all "opposition" but Nusra and ISIS, according to the bullshit report. Maybe, she belongs to Jaish al-Islam or the FSA´s Osama bin Laden Brigade? The reporter´s question to the woman is unknown, the report did not show it. She said in perfect English, that she just wants her country to be save and that she does not want foreign intervention. The bullshit report went on, stating her wish cannot be realized as the Russian army is present in the country. People may ask, why she does not take up arms to fight Assad. The report has the answer: Assad distributes humanitarian aid. "The regime distributes humanitarian aid to make clear that the fight against the regime isn´t remunerating", the report stressed. The bullshit report continued stating that "Assad´s army" does what the Russians say and more bullshit.
Is it more honest to stay away in the consequence?
Geman News TV N24 broadcasted a big bullshit report from Palmyra. The pictures show Russian forces cordoning off endangered areas and searching for explosives but the commentator´s story is another: Neither the liberation from ISIS nor the returning civilians were thematized but the Palmyra prison that is allegedly notorious, particularly for "regime opponents". Talking of "regime opponents", a westerly dressed young woman was shown. The report suggested this woman belongs to the "moderate opposition", which is all "opposition" but Nusra and ISIS, according to the bullshit report. Maybe, she belongs to Jaish al-Islam or the FSA´s Osama bin Laden Brigade? The reporter´s question to the woman is unknown, the report did not show it. She said in perfect English, that she just wants her country to be save and that she does not want foreign intervention. The bullshit report went on, stating her wish cannot be realized as the Russian army is present in the country. People may ask, why she does not take up arms to fight Assad. The report has the answer: Assad distributes humanitarian aid. "The regime distributes humanitarian aid to make clear that the fight against the regime isn´t remunerating", the report stressed. The bullshit report continued stating that "Assad´s army" does what the Russians say and more bullshit.
Stratford57
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #30
Were you talking about this clown:
Since joining the fight against Islamic State, Russia’s efforts in Syria have been repeatedly attacked by the Western mainstream media, which have published many unconfirmed reports employing scaremongering tactics.
The source in all the stories the story was identified as the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is run by one man – Rami Abdulrahman. Just recently, Abdulrahman said that the last time he had been in Syria was 15 years ago and that all the information for his reports is taken from “some of the Observatory activists” who he knows“through common friends.”
War of Words: Russian Foreign Ministry calls out MSM reports on hospital strike in Syria
One of the most widely cited ‘organizations’ in the Western media pertaining to the Syrian conflict is the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). As Tony Cartalucci astutely noted back in 2012, in his article:West’s Syrian Narrative Based on “Guy in British Apartment”, the Western media portrays the SOHR as a group of impartial and highly skilled professionals who are based in Syria:
“One would believe this to be a giant sprawling organization with hundreds of members working hard on the ground, documenting evidence in Syria with photographs and video, while coordinating with foreign press to transparently and objectively “observe” the “human rights” conditions in Syria, as well as demonstrate their methodologies. Surely that is the impression the Western media attempts to relay to its readers.”
The SOHR was founded in 2006 by the enigmaticRamiAbdulrahman (also spelled Abdurrahman, but his real name is Ossama Suleiman), who is also the director of the one-man group. He is the only individual publicly listed as working for the SOHR, with even the New York Times admitting in a 2013 article that the SOHR is “virtually a one-man band”.
Secondly, Abdulrahman is not an impartial individual himself, and is starkly opposed to the Syrian government. He told Reutersin 2012 that he would only return to Syria “when Bashar al-Assad goes”. (It should also be noted that when he was still living in Syria, Abdulrahman supposedly served three brief spells in a Syrian jail for what Reuters called “pro-democracy activism” – you can make of that what you wish).
Furthermore, the SOHR casualty count for certain periods in the Syrian conflict often differs from the figures calculated by specialists from around the world.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is a Tool of Western Propaganda | New Eastern Outlook
Bleipriester
Freedom!
His name is Muhammed Faris - from a national hero to an Al-Qaeda anti-hero...
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,241
- 275
Call me old fashioned but I long for a time when great men challenged the country to be better.
Stratford57
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #33
Let's see how well the mainstream Media covers 2016 elections:
By Finian Cunningham, for over 20 years he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organizations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent:
"In the 'Land of the Free’, the Washington political establishment and its mainstream media echo chamber are moving by sleight of hand to select the Democrat and Republican presidential nominees. Emphasis here on selection, not election.
The Socialist firebrand Bernie Sanders and billionaire magnate Donald Trump have both got momentum among ordinary voters. But as the electoral dynamic gathers pace, the political and media establishment are becoming increasingly desperate to throw spanners in the wheels.
Sanders and Trump may be at different ends of the political spectrum, but they have one big thing in common. They are outside the Washington establishment and both have articulated radical policies that appeal to ordinary voters in ways that confound vested Washington interests.
The New York Times reported this week a“Barrage of Attack Ads Threaten to Undermine Trump”. The paper discloses that Republican rivals and political action committees are planning to spend millions of dollars on new attack ads to discredit the business tycoon. Already a whopping $70 million has been spent by Republican opponents on negative campaigning against Trump.
For Sanders, the establishment gatekeepers appear to be only recently moving to action stations against his possible nomination. Up to now, the Vermont Senator has been largely ignored by the mainstream media in the US. He has been given a fraction of media coverage compared with other presidential hopefuls. But as Sanders picks up momentum among ordinary voters,“far beyond what anyone anticipated,” as the Washington Post noted, it is revealing that the media attacks are now starting to come thick and fast."
Sanders & Trump: Gatekeepers slam door on outsiders
By Finian Cunningham, for over 20 years he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organizations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent:
"In the 'Land of the Free’, the Washington political establishment and its mainstream media echo chamber are moving by sleight of hand to select the Democrat and Republican presidential nominees. Emphasis here on selection, not election.
The Socialist firebrand Bernie Sanders and billionaire magnate Donald Trump have both got momentum among ordinary voters. But as the electoral dynamic gathers pace, the political and media establishment are becoming increasingly desperate to throw spanners in the wheels.
Sanders and Trump may be at different ends of the political spectrum, but they have one big thing in common. They are outside the Washington establishment and both have articulated radical policies that appeal to ordinary voters in ways that confound vested Washington interests.
The New York Times reported this week a“Barrage of Attack Ads Threaten to Undermine Trump”. The paper discloses that Republican rivals and political action committees are planning to spend millions of dollars on new attack ads to discredit the business tycoon. Already a whopping $70 million has been spent by Republican opponents on negative campaigning against Trump.
For Sanders, the establishment gatekeepers appear to be only recently moving to action stations against his possible nomination. Up to now, the Vermont Senator has been largely ignored by the mainstream media in the US. He has been given a fraction of media coverage compared with other presidential hopefuls. But as Sanders picks up momentum among ordinary voters,“far beyond what anyone anticipated,” as the Washington Post noted, it is revealing that the media attacks are now starting to come thick and fast."
Sanders & Trump: Gatekeepers slam door on outsiders
Stratford57
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #34
As accusations of bias fly during an election year, a new report shows that Americans have serious misgivings about the media, with only six percent saying they have “a great deal of confidence” in the press.
A survey of more than 2,000 adults released on Sunday showed that trust in the media has dipped to dramatically low levels. About 52 percent of respondents said they have“some confidence”in the press, while 41 percent said they have “hardly any confidence.”
“Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry,”the report from theAmerican Press Institute reads.“The study reaffirms that consumers do value broad concepts of trust like fairness, balance, accuracy, and completeness. At least two-thirds of Americans cite each of these four general principles as very important to them.”
While the report didn’t point out any specific recent instances that have led to the erosion in public trust, the AP pointed to a Rolling Stone article on a campus rape that received widespread coverage in the US, but ultimately had to be retracted. It also highlighted inaccurate reports on the Supreme Court’s first ruling upholding Obamacare.
There have also been accusations of biased coverage of the current presidential campaigns, especially with respect to outsider candidates such as Donald Trump and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
Only 6% of Americans trust the media – survey
A survey of more than 2,000 adults released on Sunday showed that trust in the media has dipped to dramatically low levels. About 52 percent of respondents said they have“some confidence”in the press, while 41 percent said they have “hardly any confidence.”
“Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry,”the report from theAmerican Press Institute reads.“The study reaffirms that consumers do value broad concepts of trust like fairness, balance, accuracy, and completeness. At least two-thirds of Americans cite each of these four general principles as very important to them.”
While the report didn’t point out any specific recent instances that have led to the erosion in public trust, the AP pointed to a Rolling Stone article on a campus rape that received widespread coverage in the US, but ultimately had to be retracted. It also highlighted inaccurate reports on the Supreme Court’s first ruling upholding Obamacare.
There have also been accusations of biased coverage of the current presidential campaigns, especially with respect to outsider candidates such as Donald Trump and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
Only 6% of Americans trust the media – survey
Bleipriester
Freedom!
I wonder what "some confidence" actually means. The weather report?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Yuval Abraham: Staged IDF Provocateur Turned Oscar-Winning Anti-Israel Propagandist – A Profile- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
