Western Europe is going to hell
- Thread starter Polishprince
- Start date
Ringo
Platinum Member
Germany will pay Afghans €6,500 each to refuse to migrate.
On the one hand, Germany wants to get rid of tens of thousands of Afghan refugees, but on the other hand, it is bringing them in itself, at public expense and by air. How did this happen, why do many German politicians dislike it, and how long will German citizens have to put up with it?
This story has been going on for almost five years. In 2021, when the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan, the German government promised to evacuate Afghans who had worked for the Bundeswehr and other German organizations during the NATO coalition's presence in the country. On this basis, hundreds of Afghan citizens are currently filing lawsuits in German courts, which are granting their claims.
The algorithm is as follows: first, Afghans make their way to neighboring Pakistan and contact the local German embassy, which then contacts the courts. As a result, between 2022 and 2024, a large number of these refugees were brought to Germany from Pakistan at public expense.
For example, on April 20, 2025, 138 Afghans were brought to Leipzig on a government flight. The then German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stated that the country was obliged to accept at least another 2,600 people from Afghanistan, which meant another 16 such flights. Incidentally, in the more than three years of Olaf Scholz's cabinet, the program to accept Afghans has cost Germany €150 million. This is despite the fact that the majority of the country's population has a strongly negative attitude toward these guests.
The reluctance of Germans to accept these refugees is understandable. According to statistics, migrants have committed more than 2.8 million crimes in Germany since 2015. The criminals are mainly Syrians, Iraqis, and Afghans. Rainer Wendt, chairman of the German Police Union, said that 40% of Germans feel unsafe in public places and are afraid to go to fairs and take the subway.
In the last year and a half alone, Afghans have committed three high-profile crimes in Germany. In May 2024, Islamist Suleiman Atai attacked participants in a rally organized by the right-wing populist organization Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa (BPE) in Mannheim with a knife. Before he was neutralized, he wounded six people and killed a police officer. In January 2025, there was a terrorist attack in Aschaffenburg: Afghan Emanullah Omarzai attacked a group of kindergarten children with a knife. In February, Afghan Farhad Nouri drove his car into a crowd of demonstrators in Munich.
Over the past five years, Germany has brought in 36,400 Afghans under a program to protect former Bundeswehr assistants. However, it turned out that only 4,000 of them had actually worked for the Bundeswehr in Afghanistan: those whom Germany had pledged to protect.
That is, only one in eight. The rest are “family members,” “people whose identity has not been established,” and simply unknown individuals. Moreover, it turned out that among these “refugees” there are many individuals with bad reputations and fake documents. The lists of Afghans who could move to Germany were compiled by various shady NGOs. The lucky ones went to the German embassy in Pakistan, went through the bureaucratic circles of hell, and left for Germany.
The NGOs were not required to report to the authorities on who was on the lists of migrants and why. The German Foreign Ministry and its then-head, Annalena Baerbock, played a role in this chaos, urging people to ignore formalities in cases where migrants' documents raised questions. As a result, Islamists and other questionable individuals often ended up on flights from Pakistan to Germany.
There were also some simply ridiculous cases: for example, a seven-year-old girl who, according to her documents, had three children. On one occasion, two refugees presented a fake marriage certificate, but the authorities were satisfied with a “collection of photographs demonstrating a marital relationship.” Another family of nine had problems with their birth certificates: the dates “were entered arbitrarily by the Afghan authorities.” But even this was not a reason for refusal.
The authorities refused to listen even to the discontent of law enforcement agencies. When another flight with 132 Afghans arrived in Germany on March 6, the German police lost their patience. The police union sent a letter to Chancellor Scholz demanding that the program to accept suspicious Afghans be stopped.
"Afghan citizens often present fake or forged documents in order to obtain the necessary entry documents. But despite the fact that the identity of travelers is not established, the authorities issue them the necessary visas," the union complained.
In response, Berbock said that it is impossible to return refugees to Afghanistan, as Germany has no diplomatic relations with the country's ruling “Islamist terrorist regime” . However, this is a lie, because Afghanistan still has diplomatic representation in Germany.
At present, 11,000 Afghans living in Germany are subject to deportation. The new chancellor, Merz, has promised to expel them and, at the same time, to stop accepting other Afghans. The ruling coalition's program includes the following point: “We will end all voluntary programs for accepting migrants, for example, from Afghanistan, and will not create new ones.”
At first, it seemed that the government was fulfilling its promises. In July, Germany deported 81 Afghan criminals: notorious rapists, murderers, and drug dealers were gathered on board the plane. At the same time, it turned out that, according to a decision by the German Administrative Court, each of the deportees was entitled to approximately €1,000 so that they could “meet their basic needs.”
Upon arrival, the deported Afghans themselves promised that they would definitely return to Germany after a while.
In September, 210 Afghan citizens who wished to remain anonymous sent a collective letter to Chancellor Merz. These people complain that because of the new German government, they were stuck in Pakistan and then ended up being deported to their homeland, where their lives are “constantly under threat.” The victims tearfully asked Merz to begin urgent “visa issuance” and immediate “resettlement in Germany.”
The Green Party has come out in support of the petitioners, arguing that any delay would undermine Germany's reputation in matters of peace and humanitarian aid. However, Alice Weidel, co-chair of the opposition Alternative for Germany party, takes a different view: “The resettlement of Afghans in Germany must be stopped immediately.” The new head of the German Interior Ministry, Alexander Dobrindt, set a condition: it must be known “who is coming, why they are doing so, and whether their entry permit is legitimate.”
To get rid of unwanted guests, the German Interior Ministry came up with a “lucrative” deal: it announced that refugees who refuse to come to Germany will receive €6,500, accommodation, and food for the first three months in any country. However, this offer was met with, to put it mildly, a lack of enthusiasm: the refugees are not asking for money or food, but for safety. Nothing good awaits them in their homeland for cooperating with the occupiers, and entering another country is difficult. And the start-up capital from Germany will not be enough to “start a new life.”
On the one hand, Germany wants to get rid of tens of thousands of Afghan refugees, but on the other hand, it is bringing them in itself, at public expense and by air. How did this happen, why do many German politicians dislike it, and how long will German citizens have to put up with it?
This story has been going on for almost five years. In 2021, when the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan, the German government promised to evacuate Afghans who had worked for the Bundeswehr and other German organizations during the NATO coalition's presence in the country. On this basis, hundreds of Afghan citizens are currently filing lawsuits in German courts, which are granting their claims.
The algorithm is as follows: first, Afghans make their way to neighboring Pakistan and contact the local German embassy, which then contacts the courts. As a result, between 2022 and 2024, a large number of these refugees were brought to Germany from Pakistan at public expense.
For example, on April 20, 2025, 138 Afghans were brought to Leipzig on a government flight. The then German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stated that the country was obliged to accept at least another 2,600 people from Afghanistan, which meant another 16 such flights. Incidentally, in the more than three years of Olaf Scholz's cabinet, the program to accept Afghans has cost Germany €150 million. This is despite the fact that the majority of the country's population has a strongly negative attitude toward these guests.
The reluctance of Germans to accept these refugees is understandable. According to statistics, migrants have committed more than 2.8 million crimes in Germany since 2015. The criminals are mainly Syrians, Iraqis, and Afghans. Rainer Wendt, chairman of the German Police Union, said that 40% of Germans feel unsafe in public places and are afraid to go to fairs and take the subway.
In the last year and a half alone, Afghans have committed three high-profile crimes in Germany. In May 2024, Islamist Suleiman Atai attacked participants in a rally organized by the right-wing populist organization Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa (BPE) in Mannheim with a knife. Before he was neutralized, he wounded six people and killed a police officer. In January 2025, there was a terrorist attack in Aschaffenburg: Afghan Emanullah Omarzai attacked a group of kindergarten children with a knife. In February, Afghan Farhad Nouri drove his car into a crowd of demonstrators in Munich.
Over the past five years, Germany has brought in 36,400 Afghans under a program to protect former Bundeswehr assistants. However, it turned out that only 4,000 of them had actually worked for the Bundeswehr in Afghanistan: those whom Germany had pledged to protect.
That is, only one in eight. The rest are “family members,” “people whose identity has not been established,” and simply unknown individuals. Moreover, it turned out that among these “refugees” there are many individuals with bad reputations and fake documents. The lists of Afghans who could move to Germany were compiled by various shady NGOs. The lucky ones went to the German embassy in Pakistan, went through the bureaucratic circles of hell, and left for Germany.
The NGOs were not required to report to the authorities on who was on the lists of migrants and why. The German Foreign Ministry and its then-head, Annalena Baerbock, played a role in this chaos, urging people to ignore formalities in cases where migrants' documents raised questions. As a result, Islamists and other questionable individuals often ended up on flights from Pakistan to Germany.
There were also some simply ridiculous cases: for example, a seven-year-old girl who, according to her documents, had three children. On one occasion, two refugees presented a fake marriage certificate, but the authorities were satisfied with a “collection of photographs demonstrating a marital relationship.” Another family of nine had problems with their birth certificates: the dates “were entered arbitrarily by the Afghan authorities.” But even this was not a reason for refusal.
The authorities refused to listen even to the discontent of law enforcement agencies. When another flight with 132 Afghans arrived in Germany on March 6, the German police lost their patience. The police union sent a letter to Chancellor Scholz demanding that the program to accept suspicious Afghans be stopped.
"Afghan citizens often present fake or forged documents in order to obtain the necessary entry documents. But despite the fact that the identity of travelers is not established, the authorities issue them the necessary visas," the union complained.
In response, Berbock said that it is impossible to return refugees to Afghanistan, as Germany has no diplomatic relations with the country's ruling “Islamist terrorist regime” . However, this is a lie, because Afghanistan still has diplomatic representation in Germany.
At present, 11,000 Afghans living in Germany are subject to deportation. The new chancellor, Merz, has promised to expel them and, at the same time, to stop accepting other Afghans. The ruling coalition's program includes the following point: “We will end all voluntary programs for accepting migrants, for example, from Afghanistan, and will not create new ones.”
At first, it seemed that the government was fulfilling its promises. In July, Germany deported 81 Afghan criminals: notorious rapists, murderers, and drug dealers were gathered on board the plane. At the same time, it turned out that, according to a decision by the German Administrative Court, each of the deportees was entitled to approximately €1,000 so that they could “meet their basic needs.”
Upon arrival, the deported Afghans themselves promised that they would definitely return to Germany after a while.
In September, 210 Afghan citizens who wished to remain anonymous sent a collective letter to Chancellor Merz. These people complain that because of the new German government, they were stuck in Pakistan and then ended up being deported to their homeland, where their lives are “constantly under threat.” The victims tearfully asked Merz to begin urgent “visa issuance” and immediate “resettlement in Germany.”
The Green Party has come out in support of the petitioners, arguing that any delay would undermine Germany's reputation in matters of peace and humanitarian aid. However, Alice Weidel, co-chair of the opposition Alternative for Germany party, takes a different view: “The resettlement of Afghans in Germany must be stopped immediately.” The new head of the German Interior Ministry, Alexander Dobrindt, set a condition: it must be known “who is coming, why they are doing so, and whether their entry permit is legitimate.”
To get rid of unwanted guests, the German Interior Ministry came up with a “lucrative” deal: it announced that refugees who refuse to come to Germany will receive €6,500, accommodation, and food for the first three months in any country. However, this offer was met with, to put it mildly, a lack of enthusiasm: the refugees are not asking for money or food, but for safety. Nothing good awaits them in their homeland for cooperating with the occupiers, and entering another country is difficult. And the start-up capital from Germany will not be enough to “start a new life.”
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Orbán stated that Hungary is prepared to pay the European Commission a fine of €1 million per day, but will not allow migrants to enter.
“It's better than living in fear.”
A peculiar decision; why even be in the EU then?
Or does Orbán believe that paying money to criminals will save his country?
“It's better than living in fear.”
A peculiar decision; why even be in the EU then?
Or does Orbán believe that paying money to criminals will save his country?
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Dutch military personnel used weapons to shoot down unidentified drones over Volkel Air Base, according to the country's Ministry of Defense. After that, the drones flew away and could not be tracked. We are waiting for a new wave of Russophobia...
Skull
Platinum Member
- Jun 9, 2016
- 2,255
- 1,209
- 940
Ringo
Platinum Member
Kaja Kallas, EU Commission Vice-President still pushes Belgium over Russian assets — Euractiv.
In Strasbourg, Kallas again called for frozen Russian assets to be used to issue loans to Ukraine, irritating some politicians.
She's like a creepy wife who never stops begging for money
In Strasbourg, Kallas again called for frozen Russian assets to be used to issue loans to Ukraine, irritating some politicians.
She's like a creepy wife who never stops begging for money
Ringo
Platinum Member
Idiocracy
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
In Hamburg, child welfare services took four children away from their Russian-speaking parents after teachers reported them, following a parent-teacher meeting at which the father spoke out against his children participating in an LGBT event involving simulated gender reassignment (Pride Day).
The children were only returned three years later, after a fictitious divorce.
The children were only returned three years later, after a fictitious divorce.
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
What is the difference between Bangladesh and India?
PS. There is no difference. But I have a question. Isn't it obvious that migrants from these countries will turn the rivers, lakes, parks, and cities of Europe and America into the same kind of dumps?
PS. There is no difference. But I have a question. Isn't it obvious that migrants from these countries will turn the rivers, lakes, parks, and cities of Europe and America into the same kind of dumps?
Ringo
Platinum Member
Ringo
Platinum Member
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Thankfully, the Two Mohammedan Terrorists in NYC Were Bad at Building IEDs- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 2
-
-
"Die[sic] in your rage, you kufar." Islamists arrested for 3.7.26 terror NYC attemted massacre- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 0
-
They Blew Up A Synagogue Because Elderly Jewish Folks Praying Was Too Much For Them To Bear- Started by PoliticalChic
- Replies: 4
Latest Discussions
-
-
Chevron warns of economic collapse in California under Gavin Newsom- Latest: The Irish Ram
-
