Nah, nobody of any importance ever predicted such a thing would happen by now. You're making up dumb stories again.
Ah yes, you're a fucking liar - as well as stupid.
But you may be a Heavens Gate level cult moron, still I agree that the IPCC is no one of importance.
{
"In 1999
New Scientist reported a comment by the leading Indian glaciologist Syed Hasnain, who said in an email interview with this author that all the glaciers in the central and eastern Himalayas
could disappear by 2035.
Hasnain, of Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi, who was then chairman of the International Commission on Snow and Ice's working group on Himalayan glaciology, has never repeated the prediction in a peer-reviewed journal. He now says the comment was "speculative".
Despite the 10-year-old
New Scientist report being the only source, the claim found its way into the
IPCC fourth assessment report published in 2007. Moreover the claim was extrapolated to include all glaciers in the Himalayas." (
Fred Pearce)}
<p>The IPCC error on the 2035 prediction was unfortunate and it's important that such mistakes are avoided in future publications through more rigorous review. But the central message of the IPCC AR4, is confirmed by the peer reviewed literature. The Himalayan glaciers are of vital importance...
skepticalscience.com
Yeah, they don't make em' much dumber than you.
Cult's depend on stupid fucks - and you fill the bill.
The actual predictions have been excellent.
Remember, we're intelligent and well-informed, so your gaslighting has no effect on us. We know the science and the history, so we know you're peddling some nonsense that your cult fed you. I understand you don't know that, being how the less intelligent tend to be absolutely certain of their dumb beliefs, but that's irrelevant. Flat-earthers are very certain the earth is flat, but it's that doesn't change reality. Same with your beliefs.
You have an IQ in the low two digits and eat the contents from your depends.
Seriously, you must on some level grasp that you're seriously retarded?
{
Remembering that the “science is settled,” this is the year that ABC predicted that New York City would be under several feet of water due to rising seas caused by global warming.
That wasn’t all ABC News thought would be going on by 2015 as predicted in its 2008 news special entitled
Earth 2100. As
Newsbusters’ Scott Witlock reports, the news department also claimed that by 2015 we’d be paying $9 per gallon for gasoline, that milk would cost $13 a gallon, and that many other parts of the US would be under water thanks to that “settled science.”}
Remembering that the "science is settled," this is the year that ABC predicted that New York City would be under several feet of water due to rising seas caused by global warming.
www.breitbart.com
And by all means, do a cut and paste now. We've torn it all apart a hundred times before, so we can do it again.
What's the difference between AGW cultists and Tarot Card Readers? Tarot Cards occasionally make accurate predictions.
50 years of absolute failure for your fuck nut retard cult.
