Well, when there was government action to try to zone the mosque out of the area, you didn't see much protest of that from same sort of people who are now up in arms over this chicken joint.
And why was that?
btw, what actual government action was taken against Chick fil a?
The mayor of Boston vowed to keep them out of the city. It is a threat to a business, based on the beliefs of a government official. It is not the governments role to restrict or threaten to restrict based on beliefs. It is very simple and very black and white.
On a side note, I do not frequent any fast food chicken outfits due to the treatment of the animals. So I already boycott the resturant.
So, your answer, despite your careful effort not to state it explicitly,
is that there was NO actual government action taken against this chicken place.
The threat is there, it was stated publicly, it would be prudent of anyone who for or against a threat, to stand up and be heard.
The same is true of any government action that would endanger our rights and take away liberty and freedom.
If you are against a political candidate, do you not stand up and let yourself be heard? If you believe there is a perceived wrong, do you not stand up and let yourself be heard?
On this issue, did you not stand up and let yourself be heard?
If Congress has a bill or a Congressmen is wanting to pass a bill, do you not comment?
Bachmann made comments last week, did you not stand up and let yourself be heard? She didn't even talk of passing a law did she?