Well well look what we have hear

[colfax_m]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

 

[mudwhistle]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

 

[bendog]

No one is attacking their free speech.

Why did the head coach for Oklahoma State have to apologize for wearing a OANN T shirt while fishing?

Go ahead

No idea. Never heard of him.

Maybe because his players were pissed he was a racist stooge. Just sayin. LOL

Ahhhh, and your house negro who collects $50 million dollars from a company that has a well documented horrific history of labor practices with their factories in Vietnam and Pakistan wearing a ******* castro shirt proudly is what?

White liberals are liars, hypocrites and racists. Which means what about you?

Here is how castro treated blacks, but your ignorant multi millionaire victim slave is just so smart.

Did you make the racist comments that got zero hedge and google placed in time out?

 

[colfax_m]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.

 

[Billiejeens]

No one is attacking their free speech.

Not shockingly, you don't seem to (want to) understand the story.

 

[Theowl32]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.

Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.

Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?

On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.

Idiots.

 

[colfax_m]

No one is attacking their free speech.

Not shockingly, you don't seem to (want to) understand the story.

I understand it better than you geniuses.

The Federalist is perfectly free to spout their bullshit. Don’t blame Google for not wanting to help them.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.

He was warning us about both of you

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The Federalist is perfectly free to spout their bullshit. Don’t blame Google for not wanting to help them.

What bullshit were they spouting?

 

[Billiejeens]

No one is attacking their free speech.

Why did the head coach for Oklahoma State have to apologize for wearing a OANN T shirt while fishing?

Go ahead

No idea. Never heard of him.

"I'm a man. I'm 40!!!"

You've never head that? No?

.

No idea what you’re talking about. EVER!

EVER!

 

[mudwhistle]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.

Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.

 

[colfax_m]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.

Huh, that's what we said about commie Kaepernick but people think his RIGHTS were infringed. Even though he was never put into any gulag I am aware of.

Ahhhh, but a negro multi millionaire cultural marxist should be able to express his commie views. You know, just as anyone is allowed to the N WORRRRD at work, right?

On top of being ignorant about everything, you are hypocritical about everything, but hollywood agrees with you. So, that is all that matters.

Idiots.

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

NBC does not have the ability to attack free speech.

No....they just get their buds in Google to do it.

Google isn’t stopping any speech.

They're using alorythms to prevent searches....thus stifling free expression. Been doing this for years.

That doesn’t stifle expression. We have right to free speech. We don’t have a right to an audience.

Google lied to Congress and said that their search engine isn't conducting censorship....which helps the left mislead people that use their service.
Is this America or is it Cuba?
Apparently they want another Cuba.
To think they claimed Russia was influencing the election, but Google, Twitter, and Fakebook put Russia to shame.

what are you going to do? Arrest them for not being supportive enough of Teump?

Because that’s exactly the third world corruption I’d expect from this administration.

 

[bendog]

The Federalist is perfectly free to spout their bullshit. Don’t blame Google for not wanting to help them.

What bullshit were they spouting?

Well that's the question. The OP didn't say. And I didn't find precisely what it was when I googled. ZeroHedge apparently had something to do with racism. (color me shocked (- The Federalist complaint was also about racism, but it may have been unwarranted, as it possibly came from an user.

Google demonetized The Federalist after complaint of 'racism' from UK group, NBC News claims | Blaze Media

Google backtracked amid backlash, but forced The Federalist to remove its comments section

www.theblaze.com

but Federalist comments have been removed before at least on twitter, and for good reason. Public safety and false bs.

Twitter Deletes Post From The Federalist Proposing Deliberate Spread of Coronavirus

Twitter temporarily locked the account of The Federalist Wednesday after the conservative opinion site published a piece, written by a dermatologist based in Oregon, that proposed the deliberate spread of the coronavirus in order to boost immunity to the disease. The op-ed, penned by Dr. Douglas...

www.mediaite.com

 

[Asclepias]

The shadowy foreign group has a Twitter?

It seems certain people or groups have a problem with conservatives expressing opinions.

It seems you have a problem with spelling "here".

 

[Dragonlady]

Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.

He was warning us about both of you

"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

 

[bendog]

The shadowy foreign group has a Twitter?

It seems certain people or groups have a problem with conservatives expressing opinions.

It seems you have a problem with spelling "here".

Careful. A mod might move your thread if he doesn't like comments on Trump and Juneteenth. The horror

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

No one is attacking their free speech.

As people get fired for wearing t shirts

And thats just a t-shirt promoting safety

Wearing an oann t-shirt will soon get ya shipped of to gulag

 

[bendog]

Orwell was trying to warn us about Trump.

He was warning us about both of you

"1984" warning was against totalitarianism, and political repression. "Animal Farm" was Orwell's warning against communism - All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

Comparisons with George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four [edit]
In a letter to George Orwell about Nineteen Eighty-Four, Huxley wrote 'Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World'.[32] He went on to write 'Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience'.[32]

Social critic Neil Postman contrasted the worlds of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World in the foreword of his 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death. He writes:

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egotism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that our fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that our desire will ruin us.

Journalist Christopher Hitchens, who himself published several articles on Huxley and a book on Orwell, noted the difference between the two texts in the introduction to his 1999 article "Why Americans Are Not Taught History":

We dwell in a present-tense culture that somehow, significantly, decided to employ the telling expression "You're history" as a choice reprobation or insult, and thus elected to speak forgotten volumes about itself. By that standard, the forbidding dystopia of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four already belongs, both as a text and as a date, with Ur and Mycenae, while the hedonist nihilism of Huxley still beckons toward a painless, amusement-sodden, and stress-free consensus. Orwell's was a house of horrors. He seemed to strain credulity because he posited a regime that would go to any lengths to own and possess history, to rewrite and construct it, and to inculcate it by means of coercion. Whereas Huxley ... rightly foresaw that any such regime could break because it could not bend. In 1988, four years after 1984, the Soviet Union scrapped its official history curriculum and announced that a newly authorized version was somewhere in the works. This was the precise moment when the regime conceded its own extinction. For true blissed-out and vacant servitude, though, you need an otherwise sophisticated society where no serious history is taught.[33]

Brave New World - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

that said, I can't wait to retire when I can smoke weed anytime I want. LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

Nope. NBC is not stopping anyone from engaging in speech.

NBC does not like the Federalist on google, so they are trying to force the issue.

So what? The Federalist can still engage in free speech. No one is stopping them.

We need to treat Google and Twitter like they were Christian owned bakeries

It wouldn’t make any difference if you did. They’d still have every right to refuse to help the Federalist.

No, they don't have that right! They can't refuse service

There’s a million reasons that someone can refuse service that’s completely consistent with public accommodation laws and a handful of reasons why you can’t refuse service.

They are a signatory to Section 230 of the Communication Act, they claimed they were a platform, not a publisher. If they are now claiming to be a publisher, they forego their protection under 230.

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about.

Because you say so...sure

 

[colfax_m]

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

No one is attacking their free speech.

NBC seems to be.

Nope. NBC is not stopping anyone from engaging in speech.

NBC does not like the Federalist on google, so they are trying to force the issue.

So what? The Federalist can still engage in free speech. No one is stopping them.

We need to treat Google and Twitter like they were Christian owned bakeries

It wouldn’t make any difference if you did. They’d still have every right to refuse to help the Federalist.

No, they don't have that right! They can't refuse service

There’s a million reasons that someone can refuse service that’s completely consistent with public accommodation laws and a handful of reasons why you can’t refuse service.

They are a signatory to Section 230 of the Communication Act, they claimed they were a platform, not a publisher. If they are now claiming to be a publisher, they forego their protection under 230.

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about.

Because you say so...sure

Explain what a “signatory” of section 230 means. It’s a law, not a treaty you goof.