Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The 115-year-old Supreme Court opinion that could determine rights during a pandemic
When a US appeals court ruled this week that Texas could prevent physicians from performing abortions because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the judges leaned heavily on a 1905 Supreme Court decision against a Massachusetts man who had refused vaccination during a smallpox outbreak.www.cnn.com
Clever memes regurgitated by nitwits in no way changes the constitutional authority of governments to regulate behavior during national emergencies.My liberty does NOT end where your fear begins.
The Bill Of Rights takes precedence over the legal code.The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
Driving a car on State-Owned roads is not a right. Terrible analogy.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
You do NOT have the right to "impose rules for behavior" that directly infringe on individual liberty just because you're scared, jackass.
My liberty does NOT end where your fear begins.
.
The Bill Of Rights takes precedence over the legal code.The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
Believe me, there will be loads of lawsuits by people who have lost their businesses. And these would-be dictators will receive a judicial smackdown.
The 115-year-old Supreme Court opinion that could determine rights during a pandemic
When a US appeals court ruled this week that Texas could prevent physicians from performing abortions because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the judges leaned heavily on a 1905 Supreme Court decision against a Massachusetts man who had refused vaccination during a smallpox outbreak.
I'm still waiting for someone to show us where judicial review exists in Article III.
Then those “rules” need to be codified into law, not just decrees by governors.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
The Bill Of Rights takes precedence over the legal code.The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
Believe me, there will be loads of lawsuits by people who have lost their businesses. And these would-be dictators will receive a judicial smackdown.
You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
Obviously you either never read or don't understand the Bill Of Rights. No where in there does it say that .gov can shut down your business, close the churches, and force you to stay home.You shouldn't speak on subjects you know nothing about.And you are exactly what the framers of the Constitution warned us about.
health-safety-and-morals
www.law.cornell.edu
The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
Obviously you either never read or don't understand the Bill Of Rights. No where in there does it say that .gov can shut down your business, close the churches, and force you to stay home.You shouldn't speak on subjects you know nothing about.And you are exactly what the framers of the Constitution warned us about.
health-safety-and-morals
The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
I just....can't
If not available; urine is sterile.If no Purell is available, then frequent soap and water hand washes.What hand sanitizer?I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
All of these years pushing PC, quotas and diversity. When you are needed....no answers. All supposedly for the better of our culture. You go the tried and true formula of authoritarianism. All the protests and riots that ended up being bullshit! You are even to stupid to realize when the herd is thinned, you will be going to the pastures with others. In fact you can almost guarantee who it will be. And then the gulags, labor camps, concentration camps and other beauties will become part and parcel of our national identity. Yeah....all these years waiting for the greatness. And all we got were people who replace the power that was and are worse. Because they can not be criticized, ostricized and destroyed by the 95% media/entertainment complex who backs them. You still are destroying people. For stupid words and remarks. They won't forget either when the time comes.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
You are right to a certain extent. People are not at this minute starving but if we continue with the lockdown that will change in very short order. Banks can not continue to forgive, rental owners can not continue to forgive, the government can not continue to place Trillions on its credit card. There has to be a point when no matter what we have to open.You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
As every governor and Sheriff releases actual criminal offenders from jail a dumbass like you wants to fill them back up with folks not wearing a mask.People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
And the authoritarian leftists show their true colors. You better bring some friends, you'll want company where your goin'.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
How would you know...did one of us tell you?The refusal by some to understand how viruses like this spread is hard for thinking people to understand.
What hand sanitizer?I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
