saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,878
- 11,043
- 2,030
Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?
Still could have been a problem, if his first name was Tweet, Boxer or Dick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?
Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?
Dunno. It would depend on whether "Smith" handled the affair as badly as Weiner has handled it.
But it sure wouldn't have been as much fun.
![]()
Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?
Dunno. It would depend on whether "Smith" handled the affair as badly as Weiner has handled it.
![]()
But it sure wouldn't have been as much fun.
![]()

Or Johnson?Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?
Or Johnson?Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?![]()
Or Johnson?Would this thread have 500 posts if his name was Smith?![]()
Little Anthony was GOING to appear at a Dem Convention in Milwaukee, but
WEINER WITHDREW.
Updated: June 3, 2011
U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) has canceled his speaking appearance at the state Democratic Convention on Friday night in Milwaukee.
Graeme Zielinski, party spokesman, confirmed the cancellation and said the decision was Weiner's, and that the party's invitation to him was still good.
"It's understandable, considering what's going on," Zielinski added.
Weiner, an outspoken liberal voice in Congress, has been in the midst of a controversy over a photo of a male crotch in underpants sent to a female Twitter follower of his.
Weiner has denied sending the photo and says his Twitter account was hacked, but he has not denied the photo might be of him. The story has occupied much of the political world for the past few days.
Weiner was to be one of the main speakers at the convention, which starts today . . . .
Weiner won't address convention in Milwaukee - JSOnline
It's really hard not to feel sorry for the guy. He would probably give his right arm to be able to undo all those stupid remarks over the last several days - or unsend that photo if he in fact did send it and it is beginning to look more and more like he probably did but inadvertently did so publically instead of privately.
His account was RepWeiner, and he used it to communicate with his constituents.
Please refer to post #826 for what he should have done if he just wanted to meet Hawt Chicks.
His account was RepWeiner, and he used it to communicate with his constituents.
Please refer to post #826 for what he should have done if he just wanted to meet Hawt Chicks.
Just because he used the account to communicate with constituents does not make it an official "Congressional Account".
Just like if he uses a ball-point pen to communicate with constituents said pen does not become an official "Congressional Pen".
His account was RepWeiner, and he used it to communicate with his constituents.
Please refer to post #826 for what he should have done if he just wanted to meet Hawt Chicks.
Just because he used the account to communicate with constituents does not make it an official "Congressional Account".
Just like if he uses a ball-point pen to communicate with constituents said pen does not become an official "Congressional Pen".
His account was RepWeiner, and he used it to communicate with his constituents.
Please refer to post #826 for what he should have done if he just wanted to meet Hawt Chicks.
Just because he used the account to communicate with constituents does not make it an official "Congressional Account".
Just like if he uses a ball-point pen to communicate with constituents said pen does not become an official "Congressional Pen".
The account was not Anthony Weiner private citizen as most of us have Twitter accounts. His was [B] Rep[/B] Anthony Weiner and he clearly identified himself as a member of Congress and was being followed by thousands because he was a member of Congress.
You can spin this any way you want, but it was a Congressman's account that was hacked.
Just because he used the account to communicate with constituents does not make it an official "Congressional Account".
Just like if he uses a ball-point pen to communicate with constituents said pen does not become an official "Congressional Pen".
The account was not Anthony Weiner private citizen as most of us have Twitter accounts. His was [B] Rep[/B] Anthony Weiner and he clearly identified himself as a member of Congress and was being followed by thousands because he was a member of Congress.
You can spin this any way you want, but it was a Congressman's account that was hacked.
So what? As long as he was not using it to transmit any classified material what difference does it make? With all the people that communicate via facebook, twitter and what have you, you can't blame an official for using that manner of communication when it is available.
Immie