We Pay To Upgrade Iran Military Capability

Spare_change

Gold Member
Jun 27, 2011
8,690
1,293
280
Iranian officials announced late last month that Iran's defense budget had increased by 145 percent under President Hassan Rouhani and that the military is moving forward with a massive restructuring effort aimed at making it "a forward moving force," according to regional reports.

Iranian leaders have stated since the Iran deal was enacted that they are using the massive amounts of cash released under the agreement to fund the purchase of new military equipment and other armaments. Iran also has pursued multi-million dollar arms deals with Russia since economic sanctions were nixed as part of the deal.

Leading members of Congress and U.S. officials working on the Iran portfolio suspect that at least a portion of the Obama administration's $1.7 billion cash payment to Iran has been used to fund and support terrorists in the Middle East.

The latest disclosure about Iran's military buildup is further fueling concerns that U.S. cash assets returned to the country—which were released with no strings attached by the Obama administration—are helping Iran pursue a more aggressive military stance against U.S. forces in the region.

"President Obama flat-out caved in to Iran when he handed them the disastrous nuclear deal and $1.7 billion in cash payments that could assist Iran's military," GOP Rep. Sean Duffy the Washington Free Beacon. "So it's no surprise that the world's lead sponsor of terrorism would feel emboldened to become more aggressive in the region and flex its military muscle."

The move has been described by one Iran analyst as a “major policy announcement with far-reaching consequences for foreign policy.” But former Pentagon adviser Michael Rubin told the Free Beacon that it shouldn’t come as a surprise, and the Obama administration should’ve known how it would use the cash.

"Obama and Kerry might as well have wired the money directly into the accounts of those seeking to enhance Iran's military, kill Sunnis, or sponsor terrorism,” he said.
 
Iranian officials announced late last month that Iran's defense budget had increased by 145 percent under President Hassan Rouhani and that the military is moving forward with a massive restructuring effort aimed at making it "a forward moving force," according to regional reports.

Iranian leaders have stated since the Iran deal was enacted that they are using the massive amounts of cash released under the agreement to fund the purchase of new military equipment and other armaments. Iran also has pursued multi-million dollar arms deals with Russia since economic sanctions were nixed as part of the deal.

Leading members of Congress and U.S. officials working on the Iran portfolio suspect that at least a portion of the Obama administration's $1.7 billion cash payment to Iran has been used to fund and support terrorists in the Middle East.

The latest disclosure about Iran's military buildup is further fueling concerns that U.S. cash assets returned to the country—which were released with no strings attached by the Obama administration—are helping Iran pursue a more aggressive military stance against U.S. forces in the region.

"President Obama flat-out caved in to Iran when he handed them the disastrous nuclear deal and $1.7 billion in cash payments that could assist Iran's military," GOP Rep. Sean Duffy the Washington Free Beacon. "So it's no surprise that the world's lead sponsor of terrorism would feel emboldened to become more aggressive in the region and flex its military muscle."

The move has been described by one Iran analyst as a “major policy announcement with far-reaching consequences for foreign policy.” But former Pentagon adviser Michael Rubin told the Free Beacon that it shouldn’t come as a surprise, and the Obama administration should’ve known how it would use the cash.

"Obama and Kerry might as well have wired the money directly into the accounts of those seeking to enhance Iran's military, kill Sunnis, or sponsor terrorism,” he said.
Well let's not forget the PALETTES of BILLIONS in HARD CASH in UNMARKED BILLS that the kenyan had shipped to Iran in the middle of the NIGHT. I mean hey, muslims gotta take care of their muslim brothers...

Obama-Islam_zpsjnaeqbx3.jpg
 
The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency, as Republican critics of the transaction continued to denounce the payments.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Dawn Selak said in a statement late Tuesday that the cash payments were necessary because of the "effectiveness of U.S. and international sanctions," which isolated Iran from the international finance system.

The $1.7 billion was the settlement of a decades-old arbitration claim between the U.S. and Iran. An initial $400 million of euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners.

DECADES OLD ARBITRATION CLAIM.


THE END.
 
The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency, as Republican critics of the transaction continued to denounce the payments.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Dawn Selak said in a statement late Tuesday that the cash payments were necessary because of the "effectiveness of U.S. and international sanctions," which isolated Iran from the international finance system.

The $1.7 billion was the settlement of a decades-old arbitration claim between the U.S. and Iran. An initial $400 million of euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners.

DECADES OLD ARBITRATION CLAIM.


THE END.
... which, ever so coincidentally, just happened to occur at the same time as a prisoner release.

When is the last time you saw an international transfer of capital between two governments done in cash?

Even you can't buy this one .... or can you?
 
Germany, Russia, France and China wanted free trade with Iran. Iran was going to have more money no matter what we did. Iran's never nuked anyone, nor have they invaded anyone within recent history ... beyond Iraq. The question will be whether they will be a constructive proponent of peace and stability.
 
Germany, Russia, France and China wanted free trade with Iran. Iran was going to have more money no matter what we did. Iran's never nuked anyone, nor have they invaded anyone within recent history ... beyond Iraq. The question will be whether they will be a constructive proponent of peace and stability.

I think their rhetoric proves the point.
 
The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency, as Republican critics of the transaction continued to denounce the payments.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Dawn Selak said in a statement late Tuesday that the cash payments were necessary because of the "effectiveness of U.S. and international sanctions," which isolated Iran from the international finance system.

The $1.7 billion was the settlement of a decades-old arbitration claim between the U.S. and Iran. An initial $400 million of euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners.

DECADES OLD ARBITRATION CLAIM.


THE END.
... which, ever so coincidentally, just happened to occur at the same time as a prisoner release.

When is the last time you saw an international transfer of capital between two governments done in cash?

Even you can't buy this one .... or can you?

Obama got that prisoner ON TOP of the deal that would've happened anyway . That's a win.

And it was irans money . AND why do we give a shit about Iran?
 
Germany, Russia, France and China wanted free trade with Iran. Iran was going to have more money no matter what we did. Iran's never nuked anyone, nor have they invaded anyone within recent history ... beyond Iraq. The question will be whether they will be a constructive proponent of peace and stability.

I think their rhetoric proves the point.
Maybe. But sanctions were ending no matter what the US did, and Iran was getting the money we owed them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top